Anti-bullying speaker Dan Savage blasts Christian teens who walked out of lecture

[IconOfEvi]

And when the US becomes a christian theocracy that might matter.

So with all that hate flowing through your veins, can you give us an exact date or at least a rough estimate of when this theocratic revolution occurs?

Surely you must have this all thought out?

[[WDW]Megaraptor]

And when the US becomes a christian theocracy that might matter.

Are you confusing The Handmaid's Tale with actual reality?

And human rights shouldn't be put up to a vote. How would that have worked out for blacks and women?

Well, considering that the 19th Amendment (giving women the right to vote) and the Civil Rights Act were both voted on, are you saying these bills should never have been passed?

[La8pv]

So with all that hate flowing through your veins, can you give us an exact date or at least a rough estimate of when this theocratic revolution occurs?

Surely you must have this all thought out?

I think its sad that people here are defending people who hate and discriminate other people for their ****** preferance. At the same time they attack those who oppose such bigotry.
Is there anything else we can call those who cherry pick scripture so that they can justify the hate? Because they are certainly not stoning brides who are not virgin, so apparently they are picking and choosing whatever fits their "reality".

This is a perfect example for those who think that our morality has its basis in the bible. Clearly our morals derive from other sources than the bible.

[LineDoggie]

I think its sad that people here are defending people who hate and discriminate other people for their ****** preferance. At the same time they attack those who oppose such bigotry.
Is there anything else we can call those who cherry pick scripture so that they can justify the hate? Because they are certainly not stoning brides who are not virgin, so apparently they are picking and choosing whatever fits their "reality".

This is a perfect example for those who think that our morality has its basis in the bible. Clearly our morals derive from other sources than the bible.

I think its sad that people here are defending someone who espouses hate and bigotry to schoolchildren who did nothing to him. No catcalls, no bulying, merely deciding not to sit there while they were castigated for a Belief system by someone. I think its amazing you seem to have found someone using scripture here to do whatt you allege. Maybe you should re-read the thread again. The person quoting the Bible passages is someone pro bullying the children involved. Herp Mcderp is Pro Dan Savage in his posting. You dont see anyone who stands up for these children using Bible passages.
So again reread before making claims that are unsupported.

[LineDoggie]

Frankly, it's the best I could do for you, as you're impervious to reason.

Your brand of whats called reason maybe, for us on this planet your ramblings arent reason, just feculant stupididty

[That One Guy]

Your brand of whats called reason maybe, for us on this planet your ramblings arent reason, just feculant stupididty

I can only guess that this "us" you presume to speak for is the backward, torch-and-pitchfork waiving set. Thanks, I guess, for counting me out on that. Anyhow, how long do you intend to keep this up for, Torquemada? Aren't you late for a witch burning someplace?

[LineDoggie]

I can only guess that this "us" you presume to speak for is the backward, torch-and-pitchfork waiving set. Thanks, I guess, for counting me out on that. Anyhow, how long do you intend to keep this up for, Torquemada? Aren't you late for a witch burning someplace?

Not even close but as expected from you. I'm not a Bible thumper or Pitchfork set as you mustv'e thought. I also dont believe that if someone is religious they are neccessarily backwards. but of course you decided to lump anyone who wasnt like you ready to fellate Savage and his POV into one category. You have proven yourself to be "That Guy" frankly only surprised you havent acccused me of being a KKK member as well in your insipid mind.

[AfterEight]

LD is actually not a bible thumper, he may be many things, but not that.

[That One Guy]

Not even close but as expected from you. I'm not a Bible thumper or Pitchfork set as you mustv'e thought. I also dont believe that if someone is religious they are neccessarily backwards. but of course you decided to lump anyone who wasnt like you ready to fellate Savage and his POV into one category. You have proven yourself to be "That Guy" frankly only surprised you havent acccused me of being a KKK member as well in your insipid mind.

Wow, man, you should either close your trap or somehow improve your low reading comprehension skills. In the future, please do not reply to my posts unless you have read and managed to comprehend them. It is clear you have failed to do one of those things. Does that have familiar ring? I bet it does.

Good day to you, sir.

[liberal cl]

Why do you care why he registered? What business is that of yours? And does it make his post any less valid?

Once again you're being a colossal hypocrite.

If the avatar were a biblical passage then you'd be all over it but since it isn't, and it also happens to be your pet issue, you go to lengths to defend it and the poster.

I think its sad that people here are defending people who hate and discriminate other people for their ****** preferance. At the same time they attack those who oppose such bigotry.

Switch asterisks preference for religious beliefs and you'd have a point.

Is there anything else we can call those who cherry pick scripture so that they can justify the hate? Because they are certainly not stoning brides who are not virgin, so apparently they are picking and choosing whatever fits their "reality".

Though you'd love to, you don't get to micromanage other people's beliefs and convictions. At best you can try to manipulate through ridicule and hyperbole like you're doing now.

[AfterEight]

Once again you're being a colossal hypocrite.

If the avatar were a biblical passage then you'd be all over it but since it isn't, and it also happens to be your pet issue, you go to lengths to defend it and the poster.

Yes great lenghts clearly, I made one post. Don't bother answering the question though, I know you can't give a sensible one.

[LineDoggie]

Wow, man, you should either close your trap or somehow improve your low reading comprehension skills. In the future, please do not reply to my posts unless you have read and managed to comprehend them. It is clear you have failed to do one of those things. Does that have familiar ring? I bet it does.

Good day to you, sir.

Ahh the run away post, always excellent when you realize you had nothing and still try to bluff it out.