At the risk of replying to an Ordie post.
I principally agree with you, but there's one problem:
Liberal laws are the offspring of enlightenment.
The thinking of enlightenment philosophers (Voltaire, Rousseau, Kant and the US founding fathers) forms the framework of modern, western liberal societies.
Problem is, if you apply them to people who disregard the basic fundamentals of Enlightenment, you get a sort of "divide by zero" situation.
A radical muslim can't abide by Kant's cathegorical imperative because for him there is no entirety of humanity, only believers and non believers.
He won't judge wether his actions could be made law for all people, he simply disregards a large part of the group "all people"


Reply With Quote
