Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: Last F-22 unpainted

  1. #1

    Default Last F-22 unpainted

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubeJnqIH_VI

    "5/2/2012 This F-22 Raptor to be delivered to the U.S. Air Force is number 195. The aircraft is the last of the F-22's to be produced and put into service by the U.S. Air Force. Production started in 1997 and ended in 2012."

    That's it no mo' Raptors!

  2. #2
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Age
    33
    Posts
    399

    Default

    So if that's the last raptor, what will replace it?

  3. #3
    Proby? Wud dat? LongShot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    No longer a Proby....
    Age
    31
    Posts
    4,490

    Default

    I bet he can see my house....

  4. #4
    How's that Hopey Changey thing workin'? C.Puffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Goddamnit avatar GROWWWW!
    Posts
    16,083

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SgtCool View Post
    So if that's the last raptor, what will replace it?
    Some other aircraft 30 years down the road.

  5. #5
    Member Gus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Injun Country
    Age
    47
    Posts
    249

    Default

    P-51 Mustang:
    built 15,000+, cost $50,985
    F-86 Saber:
    built 9,860, cost $219,000
    F-4 Phantom:
    built 5,195, cost $2.4m
    F-15 Eagle:
    built 1,798, cost $30m
    F-22 Raptor:
    built 195, cost $150m

    A growing (exploding) defense budget does not mean a growing defense. In the real world 195 units would not justify the expense of R&D or the final price tag. But we are not talking about the real world, we are talking about DoD procurement. And what about the next generation fighter, and the next? $300m each for 50 planes? A billion each for five!?!

    But my real concern is, can a 195 really do the job? I don't think so.

    Okay, vent over.

  6. #6
    How's that Hopey Changey thing workin'? C.Puffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Goddamnit avatar GROWWWW!
    Posts
    16,083

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gus View Post
    P-51 Mustang:
    built 15,000+, cost $50,985
    F-86 Saber:
    built 9,860, cost $219,000
    F-4 Phantom:
    built 5,195, cost $2.4m
    F-15 Eagle:
    built 1,798, cost $30m
    F-22 Raptor:
    built 195, cost $150m

    A growing (exploding) defense budget does not mean a growing defense. In the real world 195 units would not justify the expense of R&D or the final price tag. But we are not talking about the real world, we are talking about DoD procurement. And what about the next generation fighter, and the next? $300m each for 50 planes? A billion each for five!?!

    But my real concern is, can a 195 really do the job? I don't think so.

    Okay, vent over.
    Problem is you can't beat a Su-35 with a P-51. So your choice is to either lose or pay "Life Insurance", i.e. produce a better fighter.

  7. #7
    L O L A JCR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    disinformation central
    Age
    33
    Posts
    10,542

    Default

    Those sums are not corrected for inflation.
    50.000 in 1940s US $ was a huge sum of money.

  8. #8
    How's that Hopey Changey thing workin'? C.Puffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Goddamnit avatar GROWWWW!
    Posts
    16,083

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JCR View Post
    Those sums are not corrected for inflation.
    50.000 in 1940s US $ was a huge sum of money.
    The A-5 Vigilante was supposedly the first fighter literally worth it's weight in gold.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Seiyuuki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Water Curtain Cave on Flower Fruit Mountain
    Posts
    3,608

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by C.Puffs View Post
    Problem is you can't beat a Su-35 with a P-51. So your choice is to either lose or pay "Life Insurance", i.e. produce a better fighter.
    Just wonder how much the individual price would be lower if we also purchase the bulk quantity of 15,000+ Raptor.

  10. #10
    Member BigWillyG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Binghamton
    Posts
    78

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by C.Puffs View Post
    Some other aircraft 30 years down the road.
    Probably one without a pilot in the cockpit.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Sundets pärla
    Posts
    90

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JCR View Post
    Those sums are not corrected for inflation.
    50.000 in 1940s US $ was a huge sum of money.
    In 2012 dollars:


    P51 - 661,257.87



    F-86 -1,976,886.72



    F-4 - 17,359,384.62


    F-15 - 39,841,210.59


    with http://www.dollartimes.com/calculators/inflation.htm
    and I checked wikipedia prices and year.

  12. #12
    Member Randy M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    SP, Colorado
    Posts
    698

    Default

    I posted this on the wrong thread....
    Last edited by Randy M; 05-05-2012 at 03:36 PM.

  13. #13
    L O L A JCR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    disinformation central
    Age
    33
    Posts
    10,542

    Default

    Very cool but this is not a F-22...

  14. #14
    Senior Member metberkut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Age
    22
    Posts
    1,701

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by C.Puffs View Post
    Problem is you can't beat a Su-35 with a P-51. So your choice is to either lose or pay "Life Insurance", i.e. produce a better fighter.
    There is any Su-35's to beat?

  15. #15
    How's that Hopey Changey thing workin'? C.Puffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Goddamnit avatar GROWWWW!
    Posts
    16,083

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BigWillyG View Post
    Probably one without a pilot in the cockpit.
    Not likely.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •