This is MilPhotos, everything is within everyone's scope, even the stuff they don't know about. I didn't make the point about being a point of law, I made the point of "should be." It's not a legal point at all.
The defense attorney who wore a traditional Islamic outfit during the rowdy arraignment of the accused Sept. 11 terrorists is defending her courtroom appeal that other women in the room wear more "appropriate" clothing to the proceedings -- out of respect for her client's Muslim beliefs.
Cheryl Bormann, counsel for defendant Walid bin Attash, attended the arraignment Saturday dressed in a hijab, apparently because her client insisted on it. She further requested that the court order other women to follow that example so that the defendants do not have to avert their eyes "for fear of committing a sin under their faith."
Reassigned to Fort Chaffee (BRAC), cleaning up brass!
To the liberal's: So, what does this joke of a tribunal show terrorist's now? It shows weakness on our (USA) part, that is what they see. This only emboldens the enemy to plan and attempt future attacks on American interests and our soil. We, USA are not winning any new "friends" or "influencing" others by allowing this circus act at all. Let me give credit where due, thank you liberals for your hair-brained approach to reality and to Cheryl Borman who has now become the poster-dhimmi of the muslims terrorist's. Your kow towing only proves their point (in their mind) that the USA is weak and can be overthrown by their continued attacks on us. Bravo miss!
P.S-Following the US rule of law is one thing, that I am not opposed. What I am opposed to, is this liberal, do-gooder (with NO common sense!) approach to its application.
I give up. It's like talking to a brick wall with you guys.
Pot, kettle, etc.
KSM was captured as an unlawful combatant in a warzone. He is being charged for acts of terror against military and civilian targets. Evidence in the trial may include sensitive military data that cannot be revealed to the public
QED it falls under a military tribunal. Do you also have a problem with the Nuremberg Trials?