Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Panama Canal Expansion: A Boon for East Coast Ports?

  1. #1
    Banned user
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Age
    46
    Posts
    24,868

    Default Panama Canal Expansion: A Boon for East Coast Ports?

    A wider, deeper Panama Canal will open in 2014, meaning that bigger cargo ships filled with more containers of consumer goods can move directly to the population centers of the East Coast instead of stopping on the West Coast and sending the goods across the country.
    More:http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/05/0...or-deeper.html

  2. #2
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    363

    Default

    By 2014 the northern path might become available to compete with panama channel

  3. #3
    How's that Hopey Changey thing workin'? C.Puffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Goddamnit avatar GROWWWW!
    Posts
    16,091

    Default

    How deep would it have to be to make a river from the Atlantic to the Pacific with no locks?

  4. #4
    bogan Violet Fashion by Mindy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Weimar
    Age
    34
    Posts
    22,307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joethesixpack View Post
    By 2014 the northern path might become available to compete with panama channel
    Canada has made it pretty clear that the North West Passage will not be allowed to be used as an alternative route.

  5. #5
    How's that Hopey Changey thing workin'? C.Puffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Goddamnit avatar GROWWWW!
    Posts
    16,091

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Violet Fashion by Mindy View Post
    Canada has made it pretty clear that the North West Passage will not be allowed to be used as an alternative route.
    What can Canada do to prevent it?

  6. #6

    Default

    48+ feet of depth minimum. The problem you have is the beam/width of the river. To go to that depth without bulkheads installed, it will have to be wide to counter situations similar to a continental geosyncline. Minimum, it will need two transit lanes, clearance for 2 panamax+ size carriers to pass one another, and pilots who will have to "learn" the areas of transits. It will be very expensive. Many US Ports on the east coast are taking on very expensive projects to accommodate these larger vessels. For example, PANYNJ is looking to raise the Bayonne bridge so that these vessels can access Port Elizabeth and Newark. Savannah is having to raise the CSS Georgia so that the river can be dredged.

  7. #7
    Doing Stupid Nyusu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2,763

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by C.Puffs View Post
    What can Canada do to prevent it?
    However, the contested sovereignty claims over the waters may complicate future shipping through the region: The Canadian government considers the Northwestern Passages part of Canadian Internal Waters,[8] but the United States and various European countries maintain they are an international strait or transit passage, allowing free and unencumbered passage.

    From wiki.

  8. #8
    Senior Member tercio67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Playing with PzH2000 again
    Age
    46
    Posts
    12,912

    Default

    Meanwhile, China plans a transcontinental railway, in Colombia....

  9. #9
    Senior Member Marsch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Germanistan
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,007

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by C.Puffs View Post
    How deep would it have to be to make a river from the Atlantic to the Pacific with no locks?
    The problem with the channel aren't the diffrent surface levels of the both oceans it connects. They just vary by about 25cm. The problem is the hard rock in that region that makes it nearly impossible to dig a channel with a depth of lets say 20m in the right height.

  10. #10
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Violet Fashion by Mindy View Post
    Canada has made it pretty clear that the North West Passage will not be allowed to be used as an alternative route.
    There is the Russian north way, besides Canadian north passage

  11. #11
    bogan Violet Fashion by Mindy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Weimar
    Age
    34
    Posts
    22,307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by C.Puffs View Post
    What can Canada do to prevent it?
    Impound any vessel that attempts to use the passage. Impose fees that make it commercially unattractive.

    Have a look at the map of the passage(s). Do you really want a giant tanker/bulk carrier/container ship transiting through the passage? Even without ice the passage is extremely narrow and would pose serious safety and environmental issues. This risk alone is worth leaving the area the largely unexplored wilderness it currently is alone.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •