Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Is the Air Force's F-22 fighter jet making pilots sick?

  1. #1
    Member ACDC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Evil Empire 2.0
    Posts
    630

    Default Is the Air Force's F-22 fighter jet making pilots sick?

    The shiniest jewel in the Air Force is its F-22 Raptor, a sleek, stealth fighter jet that the Pentagon says can outgun and outmaneuver any combat plane anywhere in the world. But for all its prowess, the Raptor has yet to be used in combat. It was designed to go up against an enemy with a sophisticated air force, which means it sat on the sidelines during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, leaving its 200 pilots to fly mainly training missions.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?...=re1.galleries

  2. #2
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    What's your excuse for not voting?
    Posts
    9,240

    Default

    Interesting, thanks for posting.

  3. #3
    Senior Member HK in AK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
    Age
    46
    Posts
    4,876

    Default

    Ever since the crash in Alaska, this has become a big issue. Bypass air through the engine to pressurize an oxygen generating system doesn't sound very healthy. It can only be three things, the bypass air itself, the oxygen generator, or the lines (both the one leading into the o2 generator and the lines running to the pilots mask). I guess you could question whether it is the hose and mask as well. They ought to run the pilot on a separate air tank to see if isn't something else that is environmental inside the cockpit.

  4. #4
    Senior Member sergey31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Californiastan.
    Posts
    3,101

  5. #5
    Last of the Mohicans boone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    East Van, man.
    Age
    43
    Posts
    17,060

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HK in AK View Post
    Bypass air through the engine to pressurize an oxygen generating system doesn't sound very healthy. It can only be three things, the bypass air itself, the oxygen generator, or the lines (both the one leading into the o2 generator and the lines running to the pilots mask). I guess you could question whether it is the hose and mask as well.
    Couldn't they use an air inlet separate of the engine intakes and compress atmospheric air to a breathable mixture at whatever altitude the cockpit is pressurized for?
    O2 generators are notoriously finicky in my experience. Even if you have to scrub the nitrogen and junk gases to get pure O2, a mechanical system seems a better solution.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by boone View Post
    Couldn't they use an air inlet separate of the engine intakes and compress atmospheric air to a breathable mixture at whatever altitude the cockpit is pressurized for?
    O2 generators are notoriously finicky in my experience. Even if you have to scrub the nitrogen and junk gases to get pure O2, a mechanical system seems a better solution.
    A separate inlet would compromise/decrease stealth a little more, which probably was the reason to put it in the engine intakes in the design.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Eindhoven
    Age
    25
    Posts
    87

    Default

    We had OBOGS in our C130....but it operated a bit different....not using the engines as inlet but a separated system. But it could not give 100% oxygen, online 96 +/- 2%
    Maybe they just dont get enough of oxygen to fly at specific altitudes?

  8. #8
    Senior Member BogT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,298

    Default

    The 60 minutes piece is a good video and puts things in perspective (the plane is great, but they should fix the oxygen problem). The other video in this thread (from abc) smells of political agenda camouflaged as reporting ("the 400 million dollar jet never flew combat missions" bit among others...).

    I hope to hear soon they found what the problem was.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HK in AK View Post
    Ever since the crash in Alaska, this has become a big issue. Bypass air through the engine to pressurize an oxygen generating system doesn't sound very healthy. It can only be three things, the bypass air itself, the oxygen generator, or the lines (both the one leading into the o2 generator and the lines running to the pilots mask). I guess you could question whether it is the hose and mask as well. They ought to run the pilot on a separate air tank to see if isn't something else that is environmental inside the cockpit.
    I don't know the schematics of the F22 ECS but on many passenger aircraft bleed air is won through the engines compressor stage. The only way exhaust fumes can get sucked into the cabin is on the ground.


    This may have something to do with the oxygen gen. producing ozone or a general environmental poisoning from new materials being used in the cockpit. I can't believe they haven't tested the ECS in a standalone manner so this a pretty mysterious thing.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Steak-Sauce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Saupreiß, Obacht!
    Posts
    9,227

    Default

    Things are getting interesting:

    F-22 Ground Crew Suffered Hypoxia-Like Symptoms


    Fresh on the heels of yesterday’s announcement by the Air Force that it thinks the hypoxia-like symptoms suffered by F-22 Raptor pilots may be caused by the jets high-altitude performance, reports are emerging that ground crew are also suffering from similar ailments when they stand near the jet while it’s engines are running. Interesting.


  11. #11
    I'll be in the corner. Rattfink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    In a knife fight with a gypsy...
    Posts
    8,437

    Default

    Apparently the problem is not only with the breathing system, as maintainers on the ground are also reporting hypoxia like symptons after working in the c0ck pit.

    http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/0...lnesses-grows/

  12. #12

    Default

    Yes, Raptor is an exceptional aircraft , but that exceptionality often seems to backlash:
    -it-can efficently operate (and manouver)at much higher altitude than other fighters-great advantage in air combat expecially in BVC- hipoxia problems- and as soon stealth can be overcome (and some radar actually can) you are in full wiew

    -it is designed to be super stealth- a nightmare to mqntain- every modification affecting stealth feature is problematic and extremely costly- No Strike Raptor, No FB-22 and neither F22B with tandem seats

    -it can communicate trought AESA radar-No link11 or 16 because they can be spotted by ESM- No interoperability with other airplanes- no mission in Lybia
    Last edited by fiorellabel; 05-10-2012 at 02:41 PM.

  13. #13
    Is That A Dick? Fade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,786

    Default

    F-22 Fighter Pilots Told to Ditch Pressure Vests; Mystery Problem Unsolved

    Pilots for the U.S. Air Force's F-22 Raptor fighter jets have been ordered to take off a portion of their flying suits, specifically the G-suit vest, during routine training missions as the service continues to investigate a rare but mysterious breathing problem some pilots have experienced in the $420 million-a-pop jets.
    http://news.yahoo.com/f-22-fighter-p...opstories.html

  14. #14
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    31
    Posts
    12,557

    Default


  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fade View Post
    F-22 Fighter Pilots Told to Ditch Pressure Vests; Mystery Problem Unsolved



    http://news.yahoo.com/f-22-fighter-p...opstories.html
    So in best case supermanovrability of F-22 would turn to be a thing of the past?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •