Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567891011 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 154

Thread: Russian Sukhoi Superjet 100 missing during testflight

  1. #61
    Senior Member Steak-Sauce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Saupreiß, Obacht!
    Posts
    9,213

    Default

    Rest in Peace. Tragic outcome, horrible photo.

  2. #62
    Senior Member tea drinker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Last place in the Eurovision
    Age
    43
    Posts
    6,801

    Default

    If the causes aren't conclusive the catastrophic results certainly are

  3. #63
    Senior Member Sootan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,273

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xaito View Post
    how was the weather when it crashed? foggy maybe?In that kind of terrain my bet is on poor visibility or pilot trying to impress the passengers with a nice view.
    The pilot did request permision to descend to 6,000 ft. FWIW, the mountain peak is at 7,200 ft.

  4. #64
    Senior Member Halidon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    1,333

    Default

    Very sad, RIP to the crew and passengers. Hope the investigation helps prevent this happening in the future.

  5. #65
    Senior Member Steak-Sauce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Saupreiß, Obacht!
    Posts
    9,213

    Default

    This is possibly the last picture of the plane, showing the SSJ #97004 just after take off: http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/lookm...6/original.jpg

  6. #66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AustinJ View Post
    + RIP + Crew


    these pics are very sad...all smiling not knowing that they will be dead soon...


    Seeing the crash site it seems like an almost 100% CFIT. My guess is that he wanted to make some low level scenery flight through the valleys to offer the potential customers an outstanding experience. Not a good idea in such a fast jet and over unfamiliar terrain with fast changing visual conditions.

  7. #67

    Default

    Good post of pilot used to fly there:
    There are questions, one of them:
    "Mount Salak is over 7000 feet high, and they were given permission to descend to 6000 feet?"

    There are no information that the ATC granted the request.
    I've flown around that area a lot in the past. It's nice and scenic in VMC. But between Mt. Salak and Mt. Pangrango, one has to have their wits around and not have a lapse of situational awareness. Some very strange winds are up there, and conditions are unpredictable even in VMC, and in IMC, it's damn awful. I must thank my fortunes to not have to go through the pass between those two mountains anymore these days!.

    If they had reached FL150 as reported, they would have had to descend prior to reaching the 30NM mark. Sounds easy enough. BUT, late afternoon in that area is normally not good for flying. I've seen clouds "collapsing down the side of Mt. Salak and spread across and cover the whole pass towards Pangrango before (I turned back... being in an unpressurized prop twin w/ no WXR). Quite often in the mid afternoon, clouds would cover both mountains, and only reveal Pangrango, and Salak is totally covered... looking like a big cumulus over small area undercast...
    http://gerryairways.blogspot.com/201...akarta-my.html

  8. #68

    Default

    update
    pardon for misleading, previous pics are correct.
    Last edited by M0P03; 05-10-2012 at 08:04 AM.

  9. #69

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by M0P03 View Post
    Good post of pilot used to fly there:
    RIP. So, 90% on 'pilot error' there...

  10. #70
    Senior Member Climber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Buenos Aires in body, the beautiful and green Sharon in my heart
    Age
    44
    Posts
    8,040

    Default

    RIP and please don not take conclusions before its known what happened.

  11. #71
    Senior Member The Dane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    I'm so Danish, even my blood cells are Red and White
    Posts
    12,287

    Default

    Bad year for Russian passengerjets..

    RIP people.

  12. #72

    Default

    RIP. Seems to be pilot error

  13. #73
    Senior Member Climber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Buenos Aires in body, the beautiful and green Sharon in my heart
    Age
    44
    Posts
    8,040

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by icefrog View Post
    RIP. Seems to be pilot error
    how do you know? based on what?

  14. #74

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Climber View Post
    how do you know? based on what?
    Based on what I've read so far. What's next? I'm trolling again?

  15. #75
    Senior Member Xaito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Age
    27
    Posts
    10,612

    Default

    we shall see, but I've read about flying in mountain areas before in it was mentioned that visibility can get extremely low at times because of clouds and fogs - that coupled with pilots who like a challange and sometimes risk too much can easily lead to catastrophe.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •