
Originally Posted by
Hollis
There could be more to this story. He made his billions on the violence (3+ billion). His wife lived very well in France.
The conflict was not limited to Palestine and Israel. It was part of the greater battles of the cold war, it has been used by dictators to maintain the oppression of their own people, etc. Arafat was a terrorist for hire. Often with people like him, it was not just himself in control.
The rejection of having a Palestinian state, probably shows that the real goal was never a two state solution. If he was for the Palestinian people, he would have accepted the deal and built from there. The other aspect, the billions in support that the PA/PLO received on a global level would probably diminish to some lesser degree. Arafat wealth and global fame was based on violence.
It has been one of the most successful run propaganda campaigns in out life time.
The other part, he may not have had the control of the PA necessary to become a state. The other terrorist's organization that operated with immunity, validity was based on terrorism. A state solution would have force them to cease their attacks. That could have created a bigger problem, a kind of civil war in Palestine.
To be a states, the state needs to operate by rule of law. The Palestinian people would be given basic human rights, like free speech. So far under Arafat, a Palestinian free speech often ended with being dragged out into the street, shot and hung from a lamp post.
The other consideration is that promoting over 50 years of hate is difficult to reverse.
Probably the other noticeable contribution to maintain the violence, is to watch how it has been used by neighboring countries, including Iran.
If the struggle was for the Liberation of the Palestinian people and their own state, the conflict would have ended long ago. There are and were just to many other parties and states that have a interest in maintaining the conflict. If it was only a cold war issue, it probably should have ended by now.
I think it is important that there is a two State solution. While it may not completely end the violence it would alter how other countries play their part in the continuation of the violence in Israel and Palestine.