What RNC Rule 40(b) says is:What you said is:Each candidate for nomination for President of the United States and Vice President of the United States shall demonstrate the support of a plurality of the delegates from each of five (5) or more states, severally, prior to the presentation of the name of that candidate for nomination.Your statement remains incorrect, and does not in any way say the same thing as Rule 40(b). What this does mean is that Paul cannot get on the ballot at the convention, something no one has contested.Delegates are only allowed to change their vote if the convention is brokered....
----------This is utterly false. I post articles about Paul delegates because I find the situation interesting and newsworthy. The Repub leadership are acting a bit like thugs when it comes to nominees that they do not support. This in no way makes me 'a Ron Paul supporter', nor does it make Ron Paul 'my boy'. That is like saying if you post a bunch of articles about Russia you must be a Putin supporter. That is not logic. It is pure BS.You are the only one supporting what amounts to Ron Paul supporters attempting to bitch and moan their way into usurping the nomination because they are part of a cult of personality you'd expect to find in Communist dictatorships instead of a democratic republic. And this is while Obama-mania still isn't dead yet. Pardon LD for calling a spade a spade in this case.



Reply With Quote