Reply With QuoteThe more the merrier.
Unconfirmed : U.S. lawmakers push for tactical nukes in S. Korea
WASHINGTON (Yonhap News) ― A U.S. congressional committee is pressuring the Obama administration to redeploy tactical nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula.
The House Armed Services Committee, dominated by Republicans, approved an amendment to the fiscal 2013 national defense authorization bill Thursday that calls for the re-introduction of the sensitive weapons to South Korea, according to Foreign Policy magazine.
It also would require Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to submit a report on the feasibility and logistics of redeploying nuclear weapons to South Korea, added the magazine.
Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ), who reportedly sponsored the amendment, and his staff were not available to confirm the report.
“We in the last many years have appealed to China to help us negotiate with North Korea to bring them in line in the quest for peace in the world... China has now embarked on selling nuclear components to North Korea,” Franks was quoted as saying in the committee’s markup.
The North has carried out two underground nuclear tests, in
2006 and 2009, and is suspected to be preparing for a third.
Some South Korean conservatives have also raised the issue of redeploying U.S. nuclear weapons to South Korea to counter the North’s missile and nuclear threats.
“(South Korea and the U.S.) should consider the re-introduction of tactical nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula,” Rep. Chung Mong-joon told reporters in Seoul earlier this week. Chung of the ruling Saenuri Party declared a presidential bid in December.
He pointed out that the North is a de-facto nuclear power, adding that bolstering nuclear capability is the only way to change Pyongyang’s approach toward Seoul.
It remains doubtful, however, that the Obama government, campaigning for a nuclear-free world and negotiations to dismantle North Korea’s nuclear weapons, will send nuclear weapons to Korea.
“Our policy remains in support of a non-nuclear Korean Peninsula,” a senior White House official told Yonhap News Agency earlier. “Tactical nuclear weapons are unnecessary for the defense of South Korea and we have no plan or intention to return them.”
The White House National Security Council did not respond to Yonhap’s fresh inquiry on whether the position has shifted.
The U.S. pulled all of its forward-based nuclear weapons out of Korea in 1991 after the two Koreas signed a deal on the denuclearization of the peninsula. Since then, the U.S. has provided a so-called nuclear umbrella for the South. (Yonhap News)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I failed to find other source to confirm this news. If it is proven to be true and the congress approves to deploy nuclear weapon in S.Korea, it is truly concerning.
The more the merrier.
This is a sh!tstorm waiting to happen.
......................
I wonder what S.Korean public think about it.
Why? Illogical and does not make sense.
I wonder on what scale it would be
Enough to take out Nork launch sites? or would they be targeting the larger military infrastructure
The redeployment itself is meaningless in terms of military as U.S can conduct nuclear strike at N.K from home any time. There is simply no needs to put nukes in S.K. In fact, U.S General used to complain how stupid it was to keep nukes in S.K. during the cold war. Therefore, it is more like a statement towards N.K for its nuclear project. However, statement it is, it still deepen the already tense situation in the peninsula.Originally Posted by Trenchcoat
Air-launched cruise missiles, sea-launched cruise missiles, ICBMs...WTF?
TLAM-Ns had their nukes removed and IIRC were all converted to conventional Tomahawks. All AGM-129s have been destroyed and many, if not most, B-52 carried AGM-86s have been converted to the conventional role. ICBMs will stay in their silos in the US. Undoubtedly they're referring to bombs as I think all nuclear artillery shells have been destroyed as well.
If the reports are true, I have a feeling they'll be aimed more at China than North Korea...
What is this 1962 again? The US can reach North Korea from anywhere, they don't need missiles on the ground.
There aren't any nuclear missiles they could put in SK if we wanted to. They're all gone. It'd be bombs.
People are freaking out over speculation and rumors. Shocking.
IF they aproved an amendment to the 2013 defence bill it can be read and confirmed.
The Bill does many interesting things. For instance those killed and wounded by Maj Nidal get the Purple Heart medal along with the pvt. killed in Arkansas recruiting center by the self proclaimed Jihadi
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...mp/~c112nzRVPP::
But I dont see any sending nukes tactical or otherwise to ROK
Posting Permissions
