Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Revealed: Goldman Sachs Sold Fake Stocks To Short Company

  1. #1
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Age
    11
    Posts
    322

    Default Revealed: Goldman Sachs Sold Fake Stocks To Short Company

    This is interesting. An attorney for the giant, bailed-out investment bank Goldman Sachs accidentally filed unredacted documents into court record last week regarding a suit brought against them by the internet retailer overstock.com.

    The documents reveal, basically, that GS "sold" stock it didn't actually own, nor was able to otherwise legitimately acquire, to investors interested in short-selling overstock.com. They did this to deliberately drive down the value of that company's stock so they could profit from their own short position on it.

    This, apparently, is a long-alleged, but hitherto unproven, practice known as "naked short selling."

    So, here we have Goldman committing fraud in order to profit from a detrimental attack against a company that is a contributor to the real economy.

    Some highlights: In one email, a Goldman exec frets that 107% of all overstock.com shares available for trade are short; an obvious impossibility unless someone was pulling shares out of their a**. Another exec, referring to regulation, exclaims "f*ck the compliance area!" Still another advises a junior to stick to the lies they've already been telling regulators for the sake of consistency.

    This is where our tax dollars are going, to prop up parasitic sociopaths working tirelessly to destroy our economy while profiting from it.

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...lling-20120515

  2. #2
    Mr. Liberal LineDoggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    38S MB 3661/8351
    Posts
    26,160

    Default

    I blame Obama.....

  3. #3
    Senior Member remo williams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    somewhere on the map
    Age
    39
    Posts
    1,679

    Default

    This is not really a revelation, at least not to those in the financial field. The financials have been doing this for quite some time now. In some events, aside from the actions of the "Plunge Protection Team," aka The Working Group of Financial Markets, it's kept the market from hitting the skids early. However it does as much down the road damage as it mitigates.

  4. #4
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Age
    11
    Posts
    322

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by remo williams View Post
    This is not really a revelation, at least not to those in the financial field. The financials have been doing this for quite some time now. In some events, aside from the actions of the "Plunge Protection Team," aka The Working Group of Financial Markets, it's kept the market from hitting the skids early. However it does as much down the road damage as it mitigates.
    It's the first I've heard of this specific type of fraud. And, apparently, there's never been documented proof of it until now.

  5. #5
    Senior Member remo williams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    somewhere on the map
    Age
    39
    Posts
    1,679

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by That One Guy View Post
    It's the first I've heard of this specific type of fraud. And, apparently, there's never been documented proof of it until now.
    It's been done in stocks as well as in metals such as Gold and Silver markets. This is just the first time it's been reported in anything "main stream." I've been hearing about short selling for at least 3-4 yrs now. Yeah it's fraud to you and I, but to the financials etc, it's part of the "free market" process of doing business.

  6. #6
    Senior Member tea drinker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Last place in the Eurovision
    Age
    43
    Posts
    6,817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by That One Guy View Post
    It's the first I've heard of this specific type of fraud. And, apparently, there's never been documented proof of it until now.
    There's no point trying to regulate them or look for proof, the Gov is backing them all the way, and if they are fined or end up bankrupt because of a legal case who do you think will bail them out? Too corrupt and connected to fail

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •