Something that troubled me about Reid, is he believes that the Mormon Faith falls in line with the Democrat Party and their way of thinking. Problem is, the majority of Mormons don't think as he does. So he is somewhat of a loose cannon. I'm surprised to be honest that he has not be excommunicated for his views on Abortion and other LEft Wing talking points. Maybe I am going to the extreme, but I know that he does not resemble any Mormon either past or present that I have had dealings with.
I was thinking the same thing. He's about as far away from what the church teaches as you can get and not be in jail.
SO IF it wasnt answered its faux rage? first of all it isnt faux rage, its wanting an answer to whether the president has paid off associates. If he did that, its justified rage then. If it isnt it dies with Wrights credibility.And Yeah I'm from NYC originally and Can Smell a lying rat bastard when I find it. One of them is Lying, Wright or Obama and you dont want to know which?
Or maybe both are liars, but it is still a non-issue as this stage. People are paid to talk, they can be paid not to talk. If Rev. Wright is withholding information on some kinds of criminal act, then that is one thing. If he says offensive things for most voters, that is not a crime, that is a non-issue. Especially in comparison to the real issues. Economy, Unemployment, Immigration, the War, etc. Rev. Wright is only known because of Obama. I could care what Rev. Wright has to say. Even if it is offensive as long as Obama did not say it too.
Part of faux rage is as it was once said, "Making a mountain our of a mole hill." If any of your "ifs" pan out, then you may have something.
BTW guilt by association does not hold up in court. Whether the association leads to something else or not, is another issue.