Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: This propeller-powered monorail would have linked London to Paris

  1. #1
    I like all kinds of haze FrankBooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Queens, New York
    Age
    24
    Posts
    9,845

    Default This propeller-powered monorail would have linked London to Paris






    Scottish inventor George Bennie had a dream. Where trains couldn't link destinations separated by water, grand railways would stretch through the skies, guiding propeller-powered planes from city to city.


    Technically, the Bennie Railplane isn't actually a monorail; to the contrary, it requires both a top and bottom rail to guide its propeller-powered planes. But like a monorail, the Railplane was meant to be a transit system deliberately separated from the ground-based one. Feeling that carrying freight and passengers along the same rails was inefficient, Bennie proposed these suspended rails that would carry passenger-only planes. He also thought it would be a brilliant way to carry passengers across the English Channel, making commutes from London to Paris fast and easy.


    http://io9.com/5915280/this-propelle...ondon-to-paris


  2. #2
    Member Kilimunati's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Age
    28
    Posts
    483

    Default

    looks like a rube goldberg accident waiting to happen.

  3. #3
    Senior Member pocoloco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    NORC
    Age
    37
    Posts
    8,070

    Default

    Swift. Safe. Sure. Yip, would have been far better than the Chunnel.

  4. #4

    Default

    They built and ran it over a test track and few could fault it but money was tight at point in time.

    Some good photos: http://dewi.ca/trains/bennie/index.html

  5. #5
    Senior Member Xaito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Age
    27
    Posts
    10,596

    Default

    those rails look like an eyesore and probably cost 400 times more to build than regular train tracks on the ground.
    Here's my proposal to separate freight transport from person transport: build them side by side, not over and under.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xaito View Post
    those rails look like an eyesore and probably cost 400 times more to build than regular train tracks on the ground.
    Here's my proposal to separate freight transport from person transport: build them side by side, not over and under.
    The cost of expanding the rail bed in the UK was much higher than in Europe and the US at the time and double decking was seen as cost effective on certain stretches so light overhead passenger rail seemed like a winner.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Seek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,070

    Default

    Mighty fine idea if you want to stop all maritime traffic in the channel...

  8. #8
    Senior Member custodes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Save the world, off a shrink.
    Posts
    11,004

    Default

    The last of the Raygun Gothic. The future that never came to be. All gone except on some pencil sharpeners and some diners and a certain kind of RV. Hugo Gernsback must have been all over this baby!

  9. #9
    Senior Member IraGlacialis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Gittin' mah edumakashuns... in the land of temples and bad traffic.
    Age
    25
    Posts
    7,586

    Default

    On the subject of "railplanes", the Schienenzeppelin bears mentioning as well:
    The Schienenzeppelin or rail zeppelin was an experimental railcar which resembled a zeppelin airship in appearance. It was designed and developed by the German aircraft engineer Franz Kruckenberg in 1929. Propulsion was by means of a propeller located at the rear, it accelerated the railcar to 230.2 km/h (143.0 mph) setting the land speed record for a petrol powered rail vehicle. Only a single example was ever built, which due to safety concerns remained out of service and was finally dismantled in 1939.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schienenzeppelin

  10. #10
    Senior Member pocoloco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    NORC
    Age
    37
    Posts
    8,070

    Default

    ^Never knew about the existence of Schienenzeppelins. Wicked things.

  11. #11
    Suspended for infractions
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Curules Equi. I'm Happy.
    Posts
    12,992

    Default

    First target of the Luftwaffe.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Piirka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    3,443

    Default

    They should have built a roller (coast to) coaster across the channel.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Bleifuss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Na terra de cartafoles de leituga
    Age
    41
    Posts
    2,525

    Default

    Doesn't have a prop , but it actually works to this day...



    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wuppertal_Schwebebahn

  14. #14
    Senior Member themacedonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Down Under and South East Europe
    Age
    39
    Posts
    5,880

    Default

    There is a similar train in Wuppertal Germany

  15. #15
    Senior Member themacedonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Down Under and South East Europe
    Age
    39
    Posts
    5,880

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bleifuss View Post
    Doesn't have a prop , but it actually works to this day...



    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wuppertal_Schwebebahn
    You beat me to it! I have been on this one.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •