We completely suck at PR, we should fukken hire a good PR group, those guys who made a "good guy" out of mini Hitler - Saakashvili.
Not comparing taking over a restricted building and committing acts of Violence upon those who work inside, to protest in the street as equal? Unforgivable on your part, you cro magnon
The definition is THAT broad.‘(1) the term ‘restricted buildings or grounds’ means any posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area—
‘‘(A) of the White House or its grounds, or the Vice
President’s official residence or its grounds;
‘‘(B) of a building or grounds where the President or
other person protected by the Secret Service is or will
be temporarily visiting; or
‘‘(C) of a building or grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national
Unless this bill has some hidden provisions, most of what they´re trying to do sounds quite reasonable IMO.
Over here they tried to jump to the other side: doing nothing, banning nothing, allowing everything. The consequences of that are terrible, and goes from total lost of control over public areas to LEO forced to get there unarmed.
It is not about riots...it is about unlawful protests...which in most cases results in public unrest.
I guess you forgot (1), (2) and (3).‘‘§ 1752. Restricted building or grounds
‘‘(1) knowingly enters or remains in any restricted building
or grounds without lawful authority to do so;
‘‘(2) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the
orderly conduct of Government business or official functions,
engages in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such
proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so
that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly
conduct of Government business or official functions;
‘‘(3) knowingly, and with the intent to impede or disrupt
the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions,
obstructs or impedes ingress or egress to or from any restricted
building or grounds; or
‘‘(4) knowingly engages in any act of physical violence
against any person or property in any restricted building or
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be punished as provided
in subsection (b).
Still too weak. I demand capital punishment. Yep
here's one, peaceful protest, look at the bloodied faces at the end of it
You really believe this crap? That your average John Q has any say in decision making processes conducted by the powerful elites?
All we get to choose is whether crook A or crook B gets the power. Western countries have better checks and balances in place due to not having to go through 3 completely radical political and social system changes in the span of just 100 years. Those checks and balances took centuries of relative stability to take hold and entrench and still there is tons of well camoflaged corruption at all levels.
since when is sabotaging railroad tracks peaceful?