Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: Study: Amazon women breast milk superior compared to USA women

  1. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Age
    32
    Posts
    3,205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vinny_121_ND View Post
    pesticides, gmo's, lack of veggies, we all know what the problem is, which is poor diet. It's not surprising. There isn't a pharmaceutical drug that can make us healthy.
    No, we dont know that. gmo' for example are surely unrelated to it. Also, I have not seen any indication that these Amazon women are healthier. In fact, they almost certainly live MUCH shorter lives.
    Their milk contains more omega-3 acids (especially DHA) because they eat fish. Fish that contains tons of DHA. Big fvcking surprise.

    Btw we dont even know if consuming DHA improves health, as DHA is also sysnthesized by the human body and studies into this have been inconclusive. Normally this is a hint that if there are effects they are at least not big.
    To be on the safe side I eat fish oil capsules from time to time though.

    Regarding diet, our main problem is just that we eat way too much. Everything else pales in comparison to that.

  2. #17
    The member that no one remembers. IconOfEvi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The United American Empire
    Posts
    12,837

    Default

    This is a travesty and a shame upon never trodden scales before. Our republic and democracy is in danger itself! Therefore, I have deduced that we must henceforth strive as patriotic and honorable Americans to make our women's breasts the best in every category

    We have the technology, we can (re)build them!



    Tranche 1 targets include more and better breastmilk

    Tranche 2 is bigger knockers, FOR EVERYONE!!

    Tranche 3 is to permanently stop time-drooping. Yes, the goal seems vast, but we have risen to the challenge before


    More information to follow. The provisional American Boob Regeneracy Board, signing off

  3. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah/Toronto, CAnada
    Posts
    6,270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Redox View Post
    No, we dont know that. gmo' for example are surely unrelated to it.

    Regarding diet, our main problem is just that we eat way too much. Everything else pales in comparison to that.
    GMO's are ok to eat? Are you sure about that? I'm getting warnings from a lot of anti-GMO websites saying all our foods should be labeled to let the consumer know and be educated of the dangers involved with them.
    http://responsibletechnology.org/health-risks

    Our diet is not that we eat way too much, but rather, we eat too much of the wrong nutrients.

  4. #19
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    why is me not banned?
    Posts
    2,263

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vinny_121_ND View Post
    GMO's are ok to eat? Are you sure about that? I'm getting warnings from a lot of anti-GMO websites saying all our foods should be labeled to let the consumer know and be educated of the dangers involved with them.
    http://responsibletechnology.org/health-risks

    Our diet is not that we eat way too much, but rather, we eat too much of the wrong nutrients.
    Bullsh*t new age "science".

    People today live longer, and a f*ckload more healthier then people did just 100 years ago. GMO began with the mixing of seeds, laboratories are just the next step.

  5. #20
    Senior Member Seek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,310

    Default

    i wouldn't say healthier.

    Our food is worse, even though we have more of it.

  6. #21
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    why is me not banned?
    Posts
    2,263

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Seek View Post
    i wouldn't say healthier.

    Our food is worse, even though we have more of it.
    If you buy your food in a fast food joint or low quality produced brands in store, then maybe, yes. I'll concede to that.

  7. #22
    Senior Member Mackie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Stuttgart
    Posts
    5,942

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirtydiaper View Post
    If you buy your food in a fast food joint or low quality produced brands in store, then maybe, yes. I'll concede to that.
    The 99% ...

  8. #23
    Senior Member Seek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirtydiaper View Post
    If you buy your food in a fast food joint or low quality produced brands in store, then maybe, yes. I'll concede to that.
    define low quality? Even higher quality branded meat will be produced in an industrial environment.

    best quality would be if you raised your own cattle and made sure it wasn't fed industrial grade feed spiked with hormones, medication, and what else not...

  9. #24
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    why is me not banned?
    Posts
    2,263

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Seek View Post
    define low quality? Even higher quality branded meat will be produced in an industrial environment.
    So what if it's produced in an industrial environment? Is there any proof of this making the food we eat less healthy?

    Quote Originally Posted by Seek View Post
    best quality would be if you raised your own cattle and made sure it wasn't fed industrial grade feed spiked with hormones, medication, and what else not...
    Same question as above. Is there any scientific research proving GMO, industrial fertilized, mass-produced food is worse then food produced in the middle ages? Or is it just that we all like to think our food was harvested 'like the good old days'?

    Sure, I'¨d like to have my meat without hormones and antibiotics, but do I have any evidence the meat I eat today (Swedish) is less healthy because of it?
    Nope.

  10. #25
    Senior Member BogT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,379

    Default

    In the west, people also feed their infants baby formula in addition to breast milk. Also, fertility related technology and treatments are improving and becoming more available. So all the downsides of "development" can be mitigated.

    Generalizing, we end up increasing the rates of some cancers, but we are also becoming better at treating all forms of cancer. And we drink our espressos, enjoy our X-Pads and iBoxes, while not dying at the age of two due to all sort of infectious diseases.

    Interesting study on human adaptation, but there is no reason to burn down our cities.

  11. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,221

    Default

    maybe something in theyr diet generate the more nutritive milk? maybe the tarantulas or monkey meat?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •