Would it be safe to assume there is a high likelyhood that the PRC is responsible for these sort of attacks?
Malicious e-mail tries to siphon data related to US critical infrastructure.
by Dan Goodin
June 11 2012, 2:50pm CDT
To get a sense of just how advanced some malware-based espionage campaigns have become, consider one recently perpetrated against Digital Bond, a security consultancy that specializes in safeguarding computer systems used to control dams, gasoline refineries, and other critical infrastructure against attack.
More: http://arstechnica.com/security/2012...stems-experts/"It's a bit concerning that a company whose sole focus is securing industrial control systems should be spear phished," wrote Reid Wightman, another Digital Bond researcher.
"The attacker clearly went to enough trouble to try to understand ICS security lingo to get the employee to open the link, and had to compromise a DNS server."
Would it be safe to assume there is a high likelyhood that the PRC is responsible for these sort of attacks?