
Originally Posted by
commanding
Very interesting. Of course the writer of the article makes it sound like "poor archaeologists" sweating outdoors digging up this site.....I believe the archaeologists know they will be outdoors digging in both hot summer and cold winters, when they sign up for archaeology in college. Although I am truly interested in military archaeology, and in forts in particular....much of the results of arch. digs such as this never get published in ways that allow the public to benefit from the knowledge in any way. Generally at best, there is a small-run publication without photos, that lists a lot of gobble-de-gook, charts and archaeology double-talk (archaeologists are famous for never using common names for anything...they call a coyote a Canis latrans and a freshwater mussel a Fusconaia askewi.
40 to 50 years ago, archaeologists in the USA were doing more, publishing more and earning respect and admiration. Now they mostly are a bunch of intellectual snobs, who constantly complain about low pay, and work at what they call "CRM" or cultural resource management.....which is mostly locating prehistoric sites, GPSing and recording the locations but not digging.