Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 38

Thread: Another green energy firm bites the dust

  1. #1
    Garand Member Ought Six's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    15,260

    Arrow Another green energy firm bites the dust

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_16...ites-the-dust/

    .... leaving American taxpayers out $400 million$. And as to how Abound got that big loan, all one need to is examine the political contributions of one of Abound's biggest investors, Pat Stryker.

  2. #2
    Member American Caesar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Notorous AC in the Hiz Haus!!!!!!!
    Posts
    469

    Default

    Obama- Hey Rocky! Want to see me pull another failed green firm out of my a$$?!

    Rocky-Again!

  3. #3
    Member Indianatheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    AZLA-HQ
    Posts
    418

    Default

    70 million of the 400 million paid to the firm - down the drain

    Abound Solar was strongly supported by politicians in both parties. Its Indiana plant was supposed to create a thousand full time jobs and generate "several hundred million dollars in revenue." Backers included Senators Richard Lugar (R-IN), Evan Bayh (D-IN) and Representatives Dan Burton (R-IN), Pete Visclosky (D-IN), Mark Souder (R-IN), Mike Pence (R-IN), Baron Hill (D-IN), Joe Donnelly (D-IN), Brad Ellsworth (D-IN) and Andre Carson (D-IN). Abound laid off 280 workers last February and reportedly will lay off 125 more next week.

  4. #4
    Senior Member G-AWZT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,710

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ought Six View Post
    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_16...ites-the-dust/

    .... leaving American taxpayers out $400 million$. And as to how Abound got that big loan, all one need to is examine the political contributions of one of Abound's biggest investors, Pat Stryker.


    The green crap is too expensive, is unsustainable, and only survives on subsidies. Those who support the green crap prey on ones guilt to sustain the garbage.

  5. #5
    How's that Hopey Changey thing workin'? C.Puffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    "Putin Fluffer Squad" *giggle*
    Posts
    16,339

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by G-AWZT View Post
    The green crap is too expensive, is unsustainable, and only survives on subsidies. Those who support the green crap prey on ones guilt to sustain the garbage.
    And the Kool-Aid drinkers fall for it again, and again, and again. They never learn.

  6. #6
    Senior Member G-AWZT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,710

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by C.Puffs View Post
    And the Kool-Aid drinkers fall for it again, and again, and again. They never learn.


    Of course because the greatest single fault of a 21st century liberal is that they want to believe so badly on how everything should be as opposed to how things really are.

  7. #7
    Milo Drinker of Death Flagg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    The (South)Island of Misfit Toys
    Posts
    13,134

    Default

    Wait until you see the Natural Gas and fracking outfits shut their doors and lay off en masse.

    Corn Ethanol, alt-energy, green jobs, NG fracking....it's all a wall street special interest shell game.

    Coal......invest in coal.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flagg View Post
    Wait until you see the Natural Gas and fracking outfits shut their doors and lay off en masse.

    Corn Ethanol, alt-energy, green jobs, NG fracking....it's all a wall street special interest shell game.

    Coal......invest in coal.
    When you look at the (quantifiable) debt levels many of these fracking companies are carrying against known resources and present $MMBtu you know it's going to end in tears.
    Coal extractors are being subjected to propaganda war funded by donations from firms in the natural gas sector, The Beyond Coal project received $25 million from the natural gas producers alone.

  9. #9
    Milo Drinker of Death Flagg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    The (South)Island of Misfit Toys
    Posts
    13,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Gently Benevolent View Post
    When you look at the (quantifiable) debt levels many of these fracking companies are carrying against known resources and present $MMBtu you know it's going to end in tears.
    Coal extractors are being subjected to propaganda war funded by donations from firms in the natural gas sector, The Beyond Coal project received $25 million from the natural gas producers alone.
    Coal would appear to be an investment option that will benefit from a Natural Gas industry collapse and inevitable price spike.

    Hmmm...which coal company to buy.

  10. #10
    bogan Violet Fashion by Mindy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Weimar
    Age
    34
    Posts
    22,445

    Default

    A few points to those who say renewable energy is something the government shouldn't be investing in.

    1. Oil and Coal will eventually run out. Oil probably in our own lifetime.

    2. I agree nuclear energy at first appears to be a solution. However this process has a number of issues that would need to be involved. For example we still need oil/gas to power most of the equipment to mine Uranium. Uranium mines are also quite nasty to the environment and are only profitable if the other precious metals are also being mined at the same location.

    3. Economies of scale will start lowering the price of renewable energy sources. Whole new industries will be created in manufacturing in building new renewable energy sources that would exceed any mining endeavors.

  11. #11
    Senior Member pocoloco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    NORC
    Age
    37
    Posts
    8,135

    Default

    With current consumption levels there's oil for next 48 years or so. Coal for next 133 years. Natural gas (LNG equiv.) for 60 years.*

    As world population rises and also living conditions improve it means more consumption on the above mentioned resources so prolly they will run out faster than that.

    Then again there are other resources that will run out faster, eg. nickel in 21 years, silver in 14 years and indium in 8 years.*

    There are deposits that surely wait for to be found but then again extracting them might be costlier and more demanding.

    * source 'The New North' p.55, author has used BP 2008 and British Geological Survey 2005 as his sources.

  12. #12
    Senior Member welshmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Coalmine
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,975

    Default

    Mining coal is also very nasty to the environment,only now after 20 years are the rivers by me starting to get bk to normal.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Mu-Meson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    May 2001
    Age
    27
    Posts
    5,139

    Default

    These loans are starting to look like the touch of death. Who knew that suckling at the teat of big govt was so poisonous?

    Quote Originally Posted by pocoloco View Post
    With current consumption levels there's oil for next 48 years or so. Coal for next 133 years. Natural gas (LNG equiv.) for 60 years.*

    As world population rises and also living conditions improve it means more consumption on the above mentioned resources so prolly they will run out faster than that.

    Then again there are other resources that will run out faster, eg. nickel in 21 years, silver in 14 years and indium in 8 years.*

    There are deposits that surely wait for to be found but then again extracting them might be costlier and more demanding.

    * source 'The New North' p.55, author has used BP 2008 and British Geological Survey 2005 as his sources.
    You do realize that people were saying this stuff 40 years ago, right? They were wrong then, and they are wrong now.

  14. #14
    Goat Roper shermbodius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Deep in the wastelands of the North
    Posts
    12,368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mu-Meson View Post
    You do realize that people were saying this stuff 40 years ago, right? They were wrong then, and they are wrong now.
    I remember and it seems it always the same sell.

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Indianatheart View Post
    70 million of the 400 million paid to the firm - down the drain

    Abound Solar was strongly supported by politicians in both parties. Its Indiana plant was supposed to create a thousand full time jobs and generate "several hundred million dollars in revenue." Backers included Senators Richard Lugar (R-IN), Evan Bayh (D-IN) and Representatives Dan Burton (R-IN), Pete Visclosky (D-IN), Mark Souder (R-IN), Mike Pence (R-IN), Baron Hill (D-IN), Joe Donnelly (D-IN), Brad Ellsworth (D-IN) and Andre Carson (D-IN). Abound laid off 280 workers last February and reportedly will lay off 125 more next week.
    Since this was bi-partisan (which isnt surprising since jobs were supposed to be created in R-districts), does that mean we can still blame the liberals and specifically obama?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •