Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 1234567891012 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 182

Thread: Rome: Total War II

  1. #16
    Banned user
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Selfhating ****
    Posts
    624

    Default

    one of my fav games. I hope they gonna fix sieges and other annoying stuff. I hated Shogun 2, because the battles were too short

  2. #17
    Senior Member DaveDash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    5,325

    Default

    I stopped playing the Total War series after about MTW2. If they did it right (option for less arcade gameplay, bigger campaign map like the old days) I'd come back to the series for this game.

  3. #18
    Peacemaker Zorro C9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    7,345

    Default

    I'm still playing Rome I! Great game. Kinda wished they'd done somewhere a bit different though, maybe Ancient China or even perhaps the 15-1600s.

  4. #19
    Member Stasi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Posts
    929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DaveDash View Post
    I stopped playing the Total War series after about MTW2. If they did it right (option for less arcade gameplay, bigger campaign map like the old days) I'd come back to the series for this game.
    Have you tried playing Stainless Steel mod?
    map there is formidably larger and AI is smarter.

  5. #20
    Member Messiah UKF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Copenhagen
    Age
    28
    Posts
    774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zorro C9 View Post
    I'm still playing Rome I! Great game. Kinda wished they'd done somewhere a bit different though, maybe Ancient China or even perhaps the 15-1600s.
    Indeed. Khan Total War would be one of my little wishes (if you include the entire depth/length of that dynasty, that's some serious scale and variety straigh off the bat). I guess the problem is finding an era with enough scale, variety and interest to base a game around, you are sort of limited to a few set periods, to an extent (in so much that empire is about as modern as you can go, because I don't think the series was ever at its best with firearms)

  6. #21
    bogan Violet Fashion by Mindy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Weimar
    Age
    34
    Posts
    22,290

    Default

    My gripe with Empire/Napoleon is that the star forts were pretty dam lame combat wise and had no semblance of reality.

  7. #22
    Member Messiah UKF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Copenhagen
    Age
    28
    Posts
    774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Violet Fashion by Mindy View Post
    My gripe with Empire/Napoleon is that the star forts were pretty dam lame combat wise and had no semblance of reality.
    I think I ended up ignoring/auto resolving all sieges in Empire, or waiting till they broke out to attack my force, at which point I just hunkered up on high ground and let rip with mortars and canister rounds - they had nothing on Rome siges (as much as I hated the sapper 'siege weapon'...). Seems they threw most of the effort into the naval battles (which is understanable as they were the 'gimic' for that encarnation) - which again I ignored once the fleets reached a certain size (just couldn't for the life of me get my head around/have enough patience to micro manage the inevitable cluster**** surrounding ships of the line)

  8. #23
    Member Stasi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Posts
    929

    Default

    I wish they made Ancient China against The Nomads: hunnu, tabgach, sianbi, tibet etc.. That would be epic.

  9. #24
    Peacemaker Zorro C9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    7,345

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Messiah UKF View Post
    Indeed. Khan Total War would be one of my little wishes (if you include the entire depth/length of that dynasty, that's some serious scale and variety straigh off the bat). I guess the problem is finding an era with enough scale, variety and interest to base a game around, you are sort of limited to a few set periods, to an extent (in so much that empire is about as modern as you can go, because I don't think the series was ever at its best with firearms)
    China around the warring states period offers all the depth, trade, politics, families, beheadings, oh yeah.

  10. #25

  11. #26
    Senior Member Soldat_Américain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Protecting the Gold Vault
    Age
    24
    Posts
    12,800

    Default

    Citadelle Lille is a pretty intense network.

  12. #27
    Senior Member Spartan10k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Georgia
    Age
    25
    Posts
    3,982

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zorro C9 View Post
    China around the warring states period offers all the depth, trade, politics, families, beheadings, oh yeah.
    ^ this is what I was hoping for.

    Still think it'll turn out to be a good game though.

  13. #28
    Peacemaker Zorro C9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    7,345

    Default

    I agree. The later games have never been "bad," not quite living up to hype/expectations but they're still not what you'd call bad games.

  14. #29
    Hammer Time T3ngu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oztralia
    Age
    88
    Posts
    16,269

    Default

    Do want!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  15. #30
    Member AcoRS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Teegeeack
    Posts
    174

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T3ngu View Post
    Do want!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Definitely , have been waiting for this since Medieval TW II, which was the last good game they put out!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •