Here we go again...next in line - Trump, Tait....
Arpaio: Obama birth record 'definitely fraudulent'
Well, one can only think of all the issues this raises...
link: http://news.yahoo.com/arpaio-obama-b...50.html?_esi=1Investigators for an Arizona sheriff's volunteer posse have declared that President Barack Obama's birth certificate is definitely fraudulent.
Members of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's posse said in March that there was probable cause that Obama's long-form birth certificate released by the White House in April 2011 was a computer-generated forgery.
Now, Arpaio says investigators are positive it's fraudulent.
Mike Zullo, the posse's chief investigator, said numeric codes on certain parts of the birth certificate indicate that those parts weren't filled out, yet those sections asking for the race of Obama's father and his field of work or study were completed.
Zullo said investigators previously didn't know the meaning of codes but they were explained by a 95-year-old former state worker who signed the president's birth certificate. Zullo said a writer who published a book about Obama's birth certificate and was aiding investigators let them listen in on an interview he conducted of the former state worker.
Here we go again...next in line - Trump, Tait....
I love you guys and your Obama flame bait threads. Reminds me of the SUV I saw the other day with Obamamao bumper sticker and Dont Tread On Me, but then I always say the birther bumper sticker about Obama showing his papers. ROFL.
Investigators for an Arizona sheriff's volunteer posse have declared that President Barack Obama's birth certificate is definitely fraudulent.
Don't you think it could have something to do with Arpaio being pissed off about Obama's opposition to SB1070 and their exchange of attacks against each other?
I don't get Arpaio does he want to be remembered for his outstanding record on corrections or chasing phantoms. What's he going to do next re-open the JFK case!
ive also been wondering about his motives lately, is he posturing for higher office in the future or is he just on his own crusade? i'm not criticizing, disparaging, or supporting him, ive just noticed him in the media a lot recently.
I just don't get "birthers" full stop - do they realise that what they are actually telling people is "Obama is bad, vote for the Republican candidate, .... who is so stupid and ineffective that with all his millions upon millions of dollars he was unable to demonstrate that Obama was'nt born here , yet I was able to do it with nothing but my tin foil hat and my momma's basement computer"
... and also they concluded that the earth is flat, pigs can fly and Elvis is alive ...Originally Posted by HK in AK
First of all Arpaio has no Jurisdiction in this matter, so his proclamation is as valid as me saying im an astronaut porn star.
Secondly it never made sense that he wasnt a Natural Born Citizen, birthed in the USA.
Fixed for ya
* Phillip Berg, esq. Democratic asst attorney General state of PA. Hillary Clinton Campaign staffer, aka Birther Zero filed the Original Obama aint American suit
Natural born citizen equals a person born in the USA of parents who are both citizens. Obama fails this test if Obama senior is his real father.
Bull, Obama is a Natural Born US Citizen.
I am not American , but I have to adress this.
Female tourist (US citizen) gets knocked up on European holiday on a one night stand. What now?
Will the kid get deported at birth as an illegal alien? Seriously dude...
And sperm donors and and and.....
US citizenship requirements and US Presidential eligiblity requirements are different.
...."Let me put it to you in appropriately simple language:
Clause A = “Only a natural born Citizen may be President.”
Clause B = “Anyone born in the United States is a Citizen.”
(While these two clauses reflect Article 2, Section 1, and the 14th Amendment, I shall refer to them as “Clause A” and “Clause B” for now.)
The code of statutory construction is learned by every student in law school, and every practicing attorney has confronted it. Every judge is required to apply the rule equally to all statutes, and the Constitution. There is no wiggle room at all. The rule states that when a court examines two clauses, unless Congress has made it clear that one clause repeals the other, the court must observe a separate legal effect for each. More specifically, regardless of the chronology of enactment, the general clause can never govern the specific.
Clause B is a general rule of citizenship, which states that all persons born in the country are members of the nation.
Clause A is a specific clause that says only those members of the nation who are “natural born” may be President.
According to the rule of statutory construction, the court must determine that Clause A requires something more than Clause B.
It’s truly that simple. This is not some crazy conspiracy theory. It’s not controversial. This is not rocket science. " .... Full text found here: http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
Birthers are hurting the legitimacy of the Tea Party Movement and those who dare criticize Obama, they really need to shut it. Obama and his pals just use them and the corresponding "you're racist" card to stifle legitimate criticism.
Posting Permissions
