Chick-fil-A president says company opposes gay marriage

[Troubadour]

My food doesn't have a political agenda. You could tell me tomorrow that all of the farms that produce bacon hold skinhead meetings on Tuesdays and I wouldn't stop eating bacon. I am buying a product I want, I am not buying a book about their personal beliefs on the world.

[Spacepope]

I'm partial to the male soldier and prisoner of war definition of biblical marriage.

[Yeti2424]

Not sure about that. I don't see supporting traditional marriage as being anti-gay. Personally, the state should offer civil unions, let the biblical organizations offer marriages. IMHO this whole affair is moronic at best. We have much bigger problems that needs to be dealt with, than who marries who.

It's not enough... In Cali they have offered a registered domestic partnership for same *** couples for years (same rights as a married couple on the state level) and were still taken to court because they wanted the word marriage. IMO it's not even about the rights, but about the word, because for some reason they think it will lead to a greater acceptace or just simply dig at those supporting traditional marriage. Who knows.

[Aerosoul]

Yeah, I agree with you on this. It always puzzled me why gays want to get married, under God, when he doesn't condone it. I 100% believe gays can have civil unions and receive the perks that come with it, tax perks. More things to worry about then ****** orientation.

I don't know many gay people that want to get married in churches. Sure, they exist. And gay Christians. So what.
They want to get married because they love their partner like hetero******s do, and want the same treatment and respect. Marriage under the law, not God.

Don't know why companies bother with these stances.
How many of you ok with this this are the same ones that rip actors for political comments?

[Chulo]

I'm partial to the male soldier and prisoner of war definition of biblical marriage.

Only proves that you are ignorant about the issue

[LineDoggie]

How many of you ok with this this are the same ones that rip actors for political comments?

REALLY? your'e going to compare a company which 90% or more of their customers arent even aware of the beliefs they have to some Lady GaGa demanding DADT be repealed or Garofalo, O'Donnell, Baldwin, Maher screeching about their stance de jure?

[LineDoggie]

I was boycotting them before it was cool.

You can be a fundie all you want, I'll work hard to keep my money out of your hands. Same goes for you, Hobby Lobby.

In the end, the boycott, as is the way the business is run, are all just choices.

More good food for the rest of us, and holy **** we aint wearing pillowcases or shemaghs while burning stuff.

So Much for being Fundies, eh?

[Laworkerbee]

Chick-fil-A is a client of ours. We provide live feeds to their menu boards.

I should upload pictures of dicks into their system.

[Mr Gently Benevolent]

Chick-fil-A is a client of ours. We provide live feeds to their menu boards.

I should upload pictures of dicks into their system.

Such an act is not beyond the wit of man This is one of the reasons CEO's should not make comments on race, religion or s£xuality as some f¥cker is going give you digital beef and ultimately add to your costs.

[Spacepope]

Only proves that you are ignorant about the issue

Nah, I'm just hoping they continue with Leviticus and get rid of employees with tattoos too. At least they don't serve shellfish.

[Chulo]

Nah, I'm just hoping they continue with Leviticus and get rid of employees with tattoos too. At least they don't serve shellfish.

Again, ignorance

[Beowulf]

Nothing but a bunch of slack jawed faggots in here.

[Trigger]

Nothing but a bunch of slack jawed faggots in here.

Amen brother.
Chick-fil-A will make you a sexual Tyrannosaurus...just like me.

[Orocairion]

Not sure about that. I don't see supporting traditional marriage as being anti-gay. Personally, the state should offer civil unions, let the biblical organizations offer marriages. IMHO this whole affair is moronic at best. We have much bigger problems that needs to be dealt with, than who marries who.

Isn't the whole argument about that, anyway?. At least when they talk about Marriage, I read it as they mean a civil union but it seems people are somehow mixing it up thinking they want to get married in a church...

Sometimes it seems the whole problem is a misunderstanding based on semantics and definitions.

[Chairborne Ranger]

It's not enough... In Cali they have offered a registered domestic partnership for same *** couples for years (same rights as a married couple on the state level) and were still taken to court because they wanted the word marriage. IMO it's not even about the rights, but about the word, because for some reason they think it will lead to a greater acceptace or just simply dig at those supporting traditional marriage. Who knows.

Why did Rosa Parks not want to give up her seat on the bus? If she moved to the back, she would still have been on the same bus, right?