You should just admit that you'd like to go dig for gold in them there Alaskan mountains...
Or at least motorboat...
Are you trying to make me mental?
You should just admit that you'd like to go dig for gold in them there Alaskan mountains...
Or at least motorboat...
Banging a broad that's had like 8 kids with names like Rope and Maple and Flax isn't that goddamned exciting anymore.
Not sure I can write anything after Joe's Freakanomic's verified statement. Except to go to Flagg's persistent question. I don't think she did, and not because I don't think she couldn't, but rather it's not near the style she's written in the past. I think she may have contributed, been consulted, etc., but the WSJ wanted her name because none of us are going to plunk down cash money or Paypal to read what Obama, Romney or Mayor Rahm would write - and who'd believe them?
I just think the smart ones don't become politicians any more.
They'll end up running companies, paying both candidates fortunes to their campaigns, so if their gamble (got to maximize profit) fail - they'll get bailed out. It's the circle of life, like the lion king.
For anyone at 25 years - it ****ing would.
So does Snooki, and she makes way more money than any of us. Palin will fade away, she was a gamble to pick that may have given a slight boost initially but as she became exposed to more media she was picked apart and opinions went from positive to negative to a ****ing joke. The reality is McCain would not have won no matter who he picked as his running mate, not even a zombie Ronnie Reagan would have worked.
What's the title of the article "How Congress Occupied Wall Street"" Politicians who arrive in Washington as men and women of modest mean leave as millionaires." Gee Mujo that pretty much sounds like the article is about folks going into Congress and using their position in office to get rich. You're the only one on here who doesn't see that so that means you get the Capt Clueless award.
What political status? When she was governor of Alaska nobody ever heard of her in the lower 48 until McCain picked her. Nobody's courting her for the "massive influence and political power that she wields like a mighty scepter." Was she different than the other suits that had been flung on the people before? Yes and that's why people took interest in her. Political status?She has none. It was popularity status. Now some can say that both are the same but when it comes to politics she's a light weight.
I just can't see her telling Putin or Iran to go pound sand like Reagan told Gorbachev about Star Wars.
....and now for the other shoe to drop...I was at the Orlando Barnes & Noble during her book signing tour. I thought she was a very pleasant person and seeing the very large orderly crowd that was there is can see why the dems were scared shipless of her.
I'm with Joe - it would be like chucking a sausage down Oxford Street/a frank down Broadway...
The bottom line is that nothing that gets published front and centre by one of the major media organisations is "written by x". x writes a draft, it's critoqued and edited and sent back to x (or someone else) for a polish/rewrite before its edited again. Then if it really is front and centre the big boss (and even the big, big boss) sticks their 2 cents in too...
All that said, from the little I've bothered to watch of her interviews I don't think she had much more to do with it than allow WSJ to put her name at the bottom.
...at least until I overthrow a country grumble grumble...
That may be, but a hole's a hole, right? What if she does kegels...just for you?Banging a broad that's had like 8 kids with names like Rope and Maple and Flax isn't that goddamned exciting anymore.
And either way, the bad hole is still good to go
Always attempt to salvage the situation![]()
Notice how any mention of Palin turns into locker room banter and dich jokes?
Grow up you cvnts.