Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 54

Thread: WP use against German Tanks, ETO, 1944-1945

  1. #1
    Moderator James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Washington
    Age
    39
    Posts
    14,161

    Default WP use against German Tanks, ETO, 1944-1945

    I've read that U.S. Sherman tank crews, when faced with superior German tanks, would often fire white phosphorous (WP) shells at the German tanks because the Americans knew their AP shells were useless, but the smoke and fumes from WP would get sucked into German tanks and force them to die or abandon the tank.

    I'm writing a novel that might or might not involve such a situation. I'll give credit where it's due.

  2. #2
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    What's your excuse for not voting?
    Posts
    9,240

    Default

    James, take a look at the paragraph The 75mm Main Gun for an alternate explanation of that scenario. http://www.militaryfactory.com/armor...sp?armor_id=40 I don't know how good the source is, but if what they're saying there is true you might be able to find it if you can get ahold of some of those AAR's they spoke of.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Astaran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Eurogeddon
    Age
    28
    Posts
    3,676

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James View Post
    I've read that U.S. Sherman tank crews, when faced with superior German tanks, would often fire white phosphorous (WP) shells at the German tanks because the Americans knew their AP shells were useless, but the smoke and fumes from WP would get sucked into German tanks and force them to die or abandon the tank.

    I'm writing a novel that might or might not involve such a situation. I'll give credit where it's due.
    Are you asking if someone can verify this information or point to someone who could?

  4. #4
    Moderator James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Washington
    Age
    39
    Posts
    14,161

    Default

    Edit -

    I'd like to know if anyone else has knowledge of such. I can't even remember what source I read, but it was only one. Even though I'm writing fiction, I like present reality.
    Last edited by James; 07-29-2012 at 10:28 PM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Astaran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Eurogeddon
    Age
    28
    Posts
    3,676

    Default

    PM send because of E-Mail address

  6. #6
    Senior Member DPM_Sheep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    閱讀這個該死的手冊
    Posts
    1,224

    Default

    Might be worth signing up to the Missing Lynx discussion boards. It may've begun life as a modeller's research site but these days it's also got a lot of historians, archivists and veterans who'll be able to offer the definitive answer or show you the original source material.

    Here's a good place to start.

    http://www.network54.com/Forum/47208...+105mm+Sherman

  7. #7
    Senior Member Mordoror's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Backstabbing allies in a foxhole
    Age
    40
    Posts
    7,707

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mein Teil View Post
    James, take a look at the paragraph The 75mm Main Gun for an alternate explanation of that scenario. http://www.militaryfactory.com/armor...sp?armor_id=40 I don't know how good the source is, but if what they're saying there is true you might be able to find it if you can get ahold of some of those AAR's they spoke of.
    I read it. Interesting, i wasn't aware of that tactic. Thanks for the link (and thanks to James for opening the thread).
    While the tactic sounds a bit "last hope one", it could have been effective indeed on Zimmerit layers

  8. #8
    Mr. Liberal LineDoggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    38S MB 3661/8351
    Posts
    26,677

    Default

    WP can be very effective as an obscurant to vehicle crews, and WP M64 probably among the best choices in that it stays in place and continues to burn as long at it has fuel. a Closed down tank already is blind to within 25M usually and now you made it that much worse. Add to that fumes and any particulates that work past the Mantlet and yeah you can see why a crew would want to unass quickly. the M3 75mm Gun was quite effective on the Bulk of the Panzerwaffe which was PzKpFw IV and Stug III/IV. Where it fell was in pentrating the Panther and Tiger Series.


    M46 HE could not penetrate the Panther/Tiger at any range. With exceeding luck it might set off a sympathetic detonation of stored rounds but so rare as to be not worth the effort.

    M61 APC shot will not penetrate the glacis of the Panther @200m. It will penetrate side/rear @ up to 1500M (as would the 57mm M86 APC round)

  9. #9
    Moderator James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Washington
    Age
    39
    Posts
    14,161

    Default

    WP can be very effective as an obscurant to vehicle crews, and WP M64 probably among the best choices in that it stays in place and continues to burn as long at it has fuel. a Closed down tank already is blind to within 25M usually and now you made it that much worse. Add to that fumes and any particulates that work past the Mantlet and yeah you can see why a crew would want to unass quickly. the M3 75mm Gun was quite effective on the Bulk of the Panzerwaffe which was PzKpFw IV and Stug III/IV. Where it fell was in pentrating the Panther and Tiger Series.
    Good info, thanks. Do you know if WP was available in 57mm or 37mm? I'll check it out too. As it's written in my novel so far, the heaviest vehicle my Americans are using is an M-8 Greyhound.

  10. #10
    Mr. Liberal LineDoggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    38S MB 3661/8351
    Posts
    26,677

    Default

    NO WP ammo for either the 37 or 57. Mostly AP, and Canister types. Nor for the 76mm, 3" either. The 90mm did have one as obviously did the 105mm
    37mm ammo used

    M2 Canister-122 steel balls
    M63 HE 39g TNT filler
    M74 AP-T shot
    M51 APCBC-T

  11. #11
    Μολὼν λαβέ Hollis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Stuck in the rain and mud again.
    Posts
    19,562

    Default

    WP is some bad azz stuff.

  12. #12
    Mr. Liberal LineDoggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    38S MB 3661/8351
    Posts
    26,677

    Default

    Oh Hey just a thought, the US would have had the M15 WP Hand Grenade and the 2.36" Bazooka had a M10 WP rocket
    http://www.designation-systems.info/.../m6rocket.html

    http://www.lexpev.nl/grenades/americ...15smokewp.html

  13. #13
    Moderator James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Washington
    Age
    39
    Posts
    14,161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LineDoggie View Post
    Oh Hey just a thought, the US would have had the M15 WP Hand Grenade and the 2.36" Bazooka had a M10 WP rocket
    http://www.designation-systems.info/.../m6rocket.html

    http://www.lexpev.nl/grenades/americ...15smokewp.html
    Thanks man. I wrote a scene in which a captured Panzerfaust + WP grenade = kaboom for a Jagdpanther. Blew it down to the tracks.

  14. #14
    Moderator James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Washington
    Age
    39
    Posts
    14,161

    Default

    Does anyone have knowledge of the ventilation systems of WWII German armored vehicles? This is related to my initial post - was it common for WP smoke to cause German crews to abandon otherwise functioning AFVs?

  15. #15
    Bro Impartial Bias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    A societal paradox is that both liberals and conservatives feel they have it all figured out.
    Age
    18
    Posts
    2,177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James View Post
    Does anyone have knowledge of the ventilation systems of WWII German armored vehicles? This is related to my initial post - was it common for WP smoke to cause German crews to abandon otherwise functioning AFVs?
    I'm sure you've heard of it, but Soviet partisans made use of Molotov cocktails against German AFV's. The smoke, and even sometimes the burning liquid fuel would seep into the seems of the vehicles, especially the engine compartment vents for the radiators etc. if the vehicles were sealed up. I assume that WP would work the same way, if not better because of its high pyrotechnic temperature. I have a book from an ex Soviet partisan, I don't remember the name of it at the moment, but if I can find it I'll post it here.

    Hope this helped.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •