Page 8 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567891011 LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 152

Thread: F-22 Fighter Loses $79 Billion Advantage in Dogfights:

  1. #106
    Senior Member Alpheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Observe Overreact Destroy Apologize
    Posts
    4,544

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marsch View Post
    "lol, kill silhouettes from exercises?" doesn't exactly sound like you were aware of it
    Yes, the question mark indicates it was news to me. So?

    and "Whats next, silhouettes on their PC's for simulator kills" was directed at the German Typhoon pilots. A sarcasm smiley doesn't changes the fact.
    I know who it was directed at. I wrote it. Again, so what?

    I just told you that you were wrong. Anyways, nice backpaddling.
    Wrong? How was I wrong, I wasn't claiming anything!

  2. #107
    Senior Member Breakfast in Vegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Reflecting on life at Narcism Pond.
    Posts
    12,786

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackZodiac View Post
    I was under the impression the F-22 was on a whole other level compared to other Russian & Nato 4.5-5 gen fighters (guess not). With price to performance ratio the Typhoons are the best bang for your buck hands down.
    LOL. Your reading comprehension and situational awareness fail you.
    Quote Originally Posted by DasVivo View Post
    Do Pilots put up kill marks for other simulated kills? If not that People are putting up kill knotches for the F-22 is probably indicative of the reputation it has, so while 'questionable' I guess it is regarded as something to be particulary proud of
    Yeah, I assume they take their claim with a grain of salt. It's lame nonetheless.

  3. #108
    How's that Hopey Changey thing workin'? C.Puffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Goddamnit avatar GROWWWW!
    Posts
    16,084

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marsch View Post
    Yep, totally uncommon.



    Stop throwing rocks while sitting in a glass house!
    The only ones who've done it are those who got Raptors. That alone says something.

  4. #109
    How's that Hopey Changey thing workin'? C.Puffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Goddamnit avatar GROWWWW!
    Posts
    16,084

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by timetraveller View Post
    The F22 was simply designed to be a fighter for American's to get a hardon about ...
    Mission accomplished.

  5. #110
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    60

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Breakfast in Vegas View Post
    LOL. Your reading comprehension and situational awareness fail you.Yeah, I assume they take their claim with a grain of salt. It's lame nonetheless.
    I fail to see how reading comprehension and situational awareness comes into this, looks like someones emotions are getting in the way. The F-22 is still the most advanced & complex fighter aircraft out there, just not for the price.

  6. #111
    Senior Member Breakfast in Vegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Reflecting on life at Narcism Pond.
    Posts
    12,786

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackZodiac View Post
    I fail to see how reading comprehension and situational awareness comes into this, looks like someones emotions are getting in the way. The F-22 is still the most advanced & complex fighter aircraft out there, just not for the price.
    If your weapon is inefficient/inferior and you lose, it doesnt matter what you paid for it... it isnt money well spent. That's all I'm saying. 1 F22 is worth 4+ Eurofighter, that kind of analogy. A Eurofighter won't get the chance for a WVR fight and even if it did, the F22 is still very capable.

    Of course if you are choosing between Eurofighter and some other aircraft other than F22 because you couldnt buy F22 if you wanted to, your purchase criteria are different.

    I still contend however, and this supports your point, that the F22 will never shoot down an enemy aircraft in its service duration... I just don't think the US will go to war with an opponent that can challenge even F15s/F16s not to mention F22s/F35s. Their role is "reduced" to intimidation and deterrence.

  7. #112
    Senior Member Xaito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Age
    27
    Posts
    10,595

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Breakfast in Vegas View Post
    If your weapon is inefficient/inferior and you lose, it doesnt matter what you paid for it... it isnt money well spent. That's all I'm saying. 1 F22 is worth 4+ Eurofighter, that kind of analogy. A Eurofighter won't get the chance for a WVR fight and even if it did, the F22 is still very capable.

    Of course if you are choosing between Eurofighter and some other aircraft other than F22 because you couldnt buy F22 if you wanted to, your purchase criteria are different.

    I still contend however, and this supports your point, that the F22 will never shoot down an enemy aircraft in its service duration... I just don't think the US will go to war with an opponent that can challenge even F15s/F16s not to mention F22s/F35s. Their role is "reduced" to intimidation and deterrence.
    if it cots 4x more is it 4x better?

  8. #113
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    60

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Breakfast in Vegas View Post
    If your weapon is inefficient/inferior and you lose, it doesnt matter what you paid for it... it isnt money well spent. That's all I'm saying. 1 F22 is worth 4+ Eurofighter, that kind of analogy. A Eurofighter won't get the chance for a WVR fight and even if it did, the F22 is still very capable.

    Of course if you are choosing between Eurofighter and some other aircraft other than F22 because you couldnt buy F22 if you wanted to, your purchase criteria are different.

    I still contend however, and this supports your point, that the F22 will never shoot down an enemy aircraft in its service duration... I just don't think the US will go to war with an opponent that can challenge even F15s/F16s not to mention F22s/F35s. Their role is "reduced" to intimidation and deterrence.
    "If your weapon is inefficient/inferior and you lose, it doesnt matter what you paid for it."

    Easy said as:

    Paid more & loose
    Paid less & loose

    There are effective ways of paying less and gaining more, a modern "tested" example with results today would be I.E.D's.

    "1 F22 is worth 4+ Eurofighter, that kind of analogy. A Eurofighter won't get the chance for a WVR fight and even if it did, the F22 is still very capable."

    Running at 80% and you're at par with your mock up competitor which costs 1/4 of the price speaks vast margins when it comes to money - performance ratios.

    Besides the unit cost alone the upkeep would be crippling and really what purpose does the F-22 serve when most of your enemies either don't have an air force or lack a competition against the regular F-16s in the current arsenal.

    "Of course if you are choosing between Eurofighter and some other aircraft other than F22 because you couldnt buy F22 if you wanted to, your purchase criteria are different."

    There were only three countries who were seriously interested in the F-22 (Japan, Israel and Australia) could have only afforded a very few. They were simply turned down in the end to enter bids on the F-35...

  9. #114
    Loadmaster General Laworkerbee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    California Über Alles
    Age
    43
    Posts
    39,889

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackZodiac View Post
    "If your weapon is inefficient/inferior and you lose, it doesnt matter what you paid for it." .
    Bullshit, piloting is everything, the aircraft is second.

    I'd take a US trained aviator in an obsolete F4 over some fluffed up Saudi in a superjet any day of the week.

  10. #115
    Senior Member Mordoror's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Backstabbing allies in a foxhole
    Age
    40
    Posts
    7,426

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Laworkerbee View Post
    Bullshit, piloting is everything, the aircraft is second.

    I'd take a US trained aviator in an obsolete F4 over some fluffed up Saudi in a superjet any day of the week.
    This
    If you have both (good plane, good pilot) it is better of course
    But a EF2000 in Saoudi hands or in RAF hands won't do the same
    A rookie F22 pilot or a seasoned F22 pilot won't do the same

  11. #116
    Garand Member Ought Six's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    14,316

    Arrow

    Quote Originally Posted by Laworkerbee View Post
    Bullshit, piloting is everything, the aircraft is second.

    I'd take a US trained aviator in an obsolete F4 over some fluffed up Saudi in a superjet any day of the week.
    I would say the pilot and the tactics used are everything. But that does not change the fact that given equally well-trained pilots, the F-22 would still have a clear advantage.

  12. #117
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    60

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Laworkerbee View Post
    Bullshit, piloting is everything, the aircraft is second.

    I'd take a US trained aviator in an obsolete F4 over some fluffed up Saudi in a superjet any day of the week.
    Laworkerbee's words not mine, hence the quotations.

  13. #118
    The member that no one remembers. IconOfEvi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The United American Empire
    Posts
    12,552

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ought Six View Post
    Things may change with a new administration. As Flagg pointed out, the more F-22s we build, the cheaper they get. We should be selling F-22s to Japan, Korea, Australia, Israel, and whichever other of our most trusted allies want them. That would mean more jobs for us and cheaper F-22s for the USAF. With a Repub Prez and Congress, that could well happen.
    Yeah I don't think we need to be seeing PRC F-22 lookalikes anytime soon. Well more lookalike than the J-20 is anyways. p)

  14. #119
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Age
    36
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Not hearing much from US pilots about this, its been almost all from the german side. But today I did see this.

    A pilot from the 3rd Wing involved w/ the engagment was contacted for comment. He stated: "I did review the HUD footage, a lot of gun shots from the F-22's to the Eurofighters and not a whole lot coming back."

    The Commander of the 525th also admitted that the F-22's were under heavy "manoeuvring limitations".

    So even under heavy manoeuvring restrictions the F-22's were, at worst, even w/ one of the best dogfighters on the planet? Whats the controversy here??

  15. #120
    Senior Member Breakfast in Vegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Reflecting on life at Narcism Pond.
    Posts
    12,786

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trpilot6 View Post
    Not hearing much from US pilots about this, its been almost all from the german side. But today I did see this.

    A pilot from the 3rd Wing involved w/ the engagment was contacted for comment. He stated: "I did review the HUD footage, a lot of gun shots from the F-22's to the Eurofighters and not a whole lot coming back."

    The Commander of the 525th also admitted that the F-22's were under heavy "manoeuvring limitations".

    So even under heavy manoeuvring restrictions the F-22's were, at worst, even w/ one of the best dogfighters on the planet? Whats the controversy here??
    Hence these comparisons are, as always, to be taken with a grain of salt.
    Quote Originally Posted by BlackZodiac View Post
    Running at 80% and you're at par with your mock up competitor which costs 1/4 of the price speaks vast margins when it comes to money - performance ratios.
    Dead is still dead. If you can afford the F22 (with all the upkeep and training) you take it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •