Put. MORE. Smileys.
The Davis quote was just sarcasm...maybe I should have put some smileys.
Put. MORE. Smileys.
The Davis quote was just sarcasm...maybe I should have put some smileys.
The real problem is British tax-laws. Price-money won in Britain is taxed, in Britian, and depending on your own countries tax-laws you might end up being taxed twice. However during the Olympics the athletes get a tax-break, but don't expect to see Usain Bolt competing in Britain ever again(unless they arrange Olympics or World Champhionship)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19101429
I don't see the problem. If you're earning in Britain you should be taxed in Britain. However for events like the Olympics, you're tax exempt.With the Olympics taking place in London, the UK would, in theory, be entitled to claim tax on prize money paid to visiting athletes. But, as is standard practice for many international sporting events, it put in place a number of tax exemptions for competitors in the Olympics - including on any prize money.
That means that only athletes from countries with a worldwide tax system on individual income are liable for tax on their medals.
I didn't know IRS was competing in the Olympics. lulz
Did you actually read the last part of my post?
In theory it's a good idea, you earn money in Britain, you pay taxes there. But in reality it hurts Britain's chances of having international tournaments of any kind. How this is a problem is rather obvious when they have to give tax-breaks to the athletes in order to get the Olympics to Britain.
Gold in best Korea brings you refrigerator. Gold in best America brings you IRS.
Read my entire post.
Here, I'll help you, since it's apperantly very difficult seeing as you've done this twice in a row now;
"How this[British tax-laws] is a problem is rather obvious when they have to give tax-breaks to the athletes in order to get the Olympics to Britain."
If you earn money in Britain, you're liable for tax in Britain, for obvious reasons. That applies whether you're Usain Bolt, Michael Jackson, or Small Business Inc. Certain earnings (eg those during the Olympics) are tax exempt. It's not a "problem" in any way, shape, or form.
If British tax-laws wasn't a problem the athletes during the Olympics wouldn't need tax-breaks, right? It's rather obvious that this is a problem, since the British are giving tax-breaks to athletes. We're talking about price-money, not earnings from a concert or a proper business, so Micheal Jackson and Small Business Inc. is not relevant.