Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Obama wants to redistribute local tax money from the 'burbs to cities

  1. #1
    Garand Member Ought Six's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    14,453

    Arrow Obama wants to redistribute local tax money from the 'burbs to cities

    Burn Down the Suburbs?

    Not exactly, but Obama is already working to get rid of them.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...-stanley-kurtz

  2. #2
    How's that Hopey Changey thing workin'? C.Puffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Goddamnit avatar GROWWWW!
    Posts
    16,172

    Default

    Gotta buy them poor votes and they're in the cities.

  3. #3
    Senior Member G-AWZT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Age
    45
    Posts
    5,613

    Default

    Section 8 is already an attempt to drive down a homeowner's hard earned investment by moving the inner city poor to live in nice neighborhoods. None of the poor have any concept of taking care of property, they will bring in crime, and drive people's property values into the ground.

  4. #4
    Goat Roper shermbodius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Deep in the wastelands of the North
    Posts
    12,088

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by G-AWZT View Post
    Section 8 is already an attempt to drive down a homeowner's hard earned investment by moving the inner city poor to live in nice neighborhoods. None of the poor have any concept of taking care of property, they will bring in crime, and drive people's property values into the ground.
    An example would be almost any suburb in California.

  5. #5
    Unpopular Nonentertaining Member Abolith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Next to death valley... it's damn hot out here :(
    Posts
    5,093

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by G-AWZT View Post
    Section 8 is already an attempt to drive down a homeowner's hard earned investment by moving the inner city poor to live in nice neighborhoods. None of the poor have any concept of taking care of property, they will bring in crime, and drive people's property values into the ground.
    don't get me started with this shlt... My old town got flooded with section 8 housing thanks to banks signing up for it with repo'd homes. the police dept saw a more than doubling of the crime in less than 6 months and my station with from an average of 4 med calls a day to 9-12 calls a day... ALL of them total BS. mostly junkies looking for a morphione fix or people too lazy to drive to the hospital so they call us thinking that they'll get a priority to be seen in the damn ER pushing back people that acctually need it... grrr. i hate section 8 with a freakin passion.

  6. #6
    Senior Member vryhpyammoadded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The Guild of Calamitous Intent
    Posts
    2,805

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by C.Puffs View Post
    Gotta buy them poor votes and they're in the cities.
    Not for long, the poor will be everywhere, the way they’re putting the world into a crisis one cannot let go to waste.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Kit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,783

    Default

    As much as I despise suburbs and think they're a waste of resources, space, and counterintuitive to building communities, I feel that Obama's beef against suburbia is more about wealth distribution than efficient urban planning.

  8. #8
    Milo Drinker of Death Flagg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    The (South)Island of Misfit Toys
    Posts
    12,955

    Default

    How exactly can the President, ANY President, force a commingling of state/local taxation or a reallocation of state/local taxation?

    The President/Congress don't have the authority to earmark state/local taxation do they?

    I could imagine policy as a disincentive.....like federal highway funds held back if states didn't increase drinking age from 18 to 21 as I heard they did a few decades a go.

    But I'm a bit confused by this one in how President Obama could force a single penny of local McMansion property taxes being reallocated away from the Star Trek suburban high school to the crack house inner city high school.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Chulo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    17,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flagg View Post
    How exactly can the President, ANY President, force a commingling of state/local taxation or a reallocation of state/local taxation?

    The President/Congress don't have the authority to earmark state/local taxation do they?

    I could imagine policy as a disincentive.....like federal highway funds held back if states didn't increase drinking age from 18 to 21 as I heard they did a few decades a go.

    But I'm a bit confused by this one in how President Obama could force a single penny of local McMansion property taxes being reallocated away from the Star Trek suburban high school to the crack house inner city high school.
    Its Obama, look what he has done with the "Not DREAM" ACT and other presidential mandates that subvert congress and federalism

  10. #10
    Gun Nut Geezah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Hey everyone, look at me, I'm the only important one here...
    Age
    43
    Posts
    13,384

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flagg View Post
    How exactly can the President, ANY President, force a commingling of state/local taxation or a reallocation of state/local taxation?

    The President/Congress don't have the authority to earmark state/local taxation do they?

    I could imagine policy as a disincentive.....like federal highway funds held back if states didn't increase drinking age from 18 to 21 as I heard they did a few decades a go.

    But I'm a bit confused by this one in how President Obama could force a single penny of local McMansion property taxes being reallocated away from the Star Trek suburban high school to the crack house inner city high school.
    It would be worked through the groups he had/has close ties to........

  11. #11
    Senior Member Mujo2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Very close to the geographical center
    Age
    32
    Posts
    2,351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flagg View Post
    How exactly can the President, ANY President, force a commingling of state/local taxation or a reallocation of state/local taxation?

    The President/Congress don't have the authority to earmark state/local taxation do they?

    I could imagine policy as a disincentive.....like federal highway funds held back if states didn't increase drinking age from 18 to 21 as I heard they did a few decades a go.

    But I'm a bit confused by this one in how President Obama could force a single penny of local McMansion property taxes being reallocated away from the Star Trek suburban high school to the crack house inner city high school.
    Pfft...Maybe one of these days you'll open your eyes to the omni _____ that is Obama.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chulo View Post
    Its Obama, look what he has done with the "Not DREAM" ACT and other presidential mandates that subvert congress and federalism
    Like, immigration is a federal thing, like. El Presidente can like direct the pertinent secretary to, like, do things the way he likes it. You know. Like, "Hey, don't check on these people anymore!! They are my voters!!"
    On the local level, where cities and counties are concerned, I am sure he can send some of his ACORN ninjars to run for city councils and re-distribute the wealth. You know. Recruit a dozen candidates for every city and county council in America. He can do that...theoretically...maybe...you know.

  12. #12
    Garand Member Ought Six's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    14,453

    Arrow

    Quote Originally Posted by Geezah View Post
    It would be worked through the groups he had/has close ties to........
    Exactly. I am sure his former Chief of Staff and now Mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emmanuel is already working on plans for the city of Chicago to move to incorporate unincorporated suburbs. Also, as surrounding cities suffer bankruptcy, look for Chicago to move in to 'save' them, which features hidden in the plans and agreements that enable Chicago to eventually incorporate them as well. I think this is exactly the template they will use.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •