Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Where is the engine of this drone?

  1. #1

    Default Where is the engine of this drone?

    Seriously, I have no idea how this drone (LUNA NG by EMT, Germany) will be powered and where the engine is supposed to go.

    obviously there are no plans for a propeller or engine in the nose, the space between the twin tailbooms is too narrow for a propeller, there is no engine pylon on top of the fuselage like the one on the original LUNA drone, a jet engine between the tailbooms would burn up the elevator ...

    No relevant info on google either, just general info about the aircraft.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	emt-luna-ng.jpg 
Views:	1372 
Size:	66.5 KB 
ID:	185195

  2. #2
    Bro Impartial Bias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    A societal paradox is that both liberals and conservatives feel they have it all figured out.
    Age
    18
    Posts
    2,177

    Default

    It utilizes Repulsor Lift technology.

    Maybe it's just a handheld short range glider?

    EDIT: No, that's stupid^^. This thing is way too big.

    Room for a pusher type propeller on the top?

  3. #3
    Senior Member Seek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,314

    Default

    it's pulled on a cable by a EF Typhoon when deployed...

  4. #4
    Senior Member tercio67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Playing with PzH2000 again
    Age
    46
    Posts
    13,055

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mhpr262 View Post
    Seriously, I have no idea how this drone (LUNA NG by EMT, Germany) will be powered and where the engine is supposed to go.
    ....
    Ask them;

    http://www.emt-penzberg.de/index.php?id=3&L=1

  5. #5
    Senior Member Sniffit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Socialist Scandinavia
    Posts
    2,191

    Default

    It is likely that it has the same engine placement as the LUNA which is on top.
    I base this assumption on the fact that it is supposed to be compatible with all the old equipment.

  6. #6

    Default

    My guess is that the engine is another drone flying higher up (you can see the wires coming down in the picture).
    No doubt a genius move made by the germans to reduce detection by sound.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Luna-AmySvitak.jpg 
Views:	473 
Size:	115.9 KB 
ID:	185198

  7. #7
    Senior Member Piirka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    3,639

    Default

    As already guessed, it is on the top.


  8. #8

    Default

    You have to give EMT a credit for not allowing minor details ( like engine ) to ruin uber-cool air-frame design

    At last they figured out to replace a strange looking "cross-tail" with a twin boom tail
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	luna_1.jpg 
Views:	472 
Size:	44.8 KB 
ID:	185200

  9. #9

    Default

    Probably on top like the last luna... just not on the mockup.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Impartial Bias View Post
    .

    Room for a pusher type propeller on the top?
    Quote Originally Posted by Sniffit View Post
    It is likely that it has the same engine placement as the LUNA which is on top.
    Quote Originally Posted by MeiJoa View Post
    Probably on top like the last luna... just not on the mockup.
    I think you are all right ... if one looks really closely, something can be seen in the "corner" (of the 2D Pic) between the left wing and the sloping backend from which the twin boom juts out that I think is a black propeller blade with a white tip, just like the old LUNA had. At first glance it looks like a part of the neon lighting on the ceiling but it isnt.

    Still, an elegant, good looking design I must say ... very unlike the old one

  11. #11
    Member Marauder Shields's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    gulf coast
    Posts
    84

    Default

    Runs on swag

  12. #12
    Member PMI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Hither & Yon
    Posts
    813

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mhpr262 View Post
    Still, an elegant, good looking design I must say ... very unlike the old one
    It really looks like something Ernst Heinkel would build.

  13. #13
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    What's your excuse for not voting?
    Posts
    9,240

    Default


    Es fliegt auf den Atem Gottes! Ahhahahahahaha!!!!! ...cough cough.

  14. #14
    Senior Member wiking's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Norway.
    Age
    26
    Posts
    3,870

    Default

    perchance they put the hot, messy bits on top, to keep it away from sensitive electronics and FLIR?

  15. #15

    Default

    My guess (as a long time RC plane pilot) would be that this position is just the most practical for serveral reasons - this way the propeller does not obscure the camera view like a nose mounted engine would, the plane can be handled relatively safely with the propeller spinning, like you said there is no hot and vibrating engine packed inside the fuselage together with the super sensitive electronics and sensors and the propeller and engine are out of harmīs way when the plane lands (presumably dangling from a parachute with an airbag under its belly) ...

    maybe even a little protection from IR optics on the ground.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •