Palestinian radicalization predates the IAF and the IDF in general.
Look up the 1929 Hebron Massacre as a point of reference.
Both Jews and Arabs lived in the geographic area that is now Israel for over a millennium.And please stop this "proving" that Palestians are from the area or not, the fact is after WW2 the British allowed Jewish refugees to reclaim Israel with little regard for those who had lived there for over a millennia.
No one is going to claim that all Jews who lived in this land on the night of Israeli independence are decedents of those who held a continues residence in this land, claiming the same for the Palestinians that were here in 1948 is just as much of lie though.
Arab immigration to Palestine during the British Mandate is a well documented historical fact, just the same as Jewish immigration.
There are plenty of reasons as to why they don't have a state of their own.Now these people hardly have a state to call their own from a people that have barely been there for 60 years.
Any person with a basic knowledge of history will know that the majority of these reasons are the Palestinian's own fault (or the fault of their so called Arab brethren).
Have you no basic knowledge of history and logic you pinko leftist terror apologist?Have you no humanity or compassion you nationalist israelis?
The Security Council has pointed out that Israel does not have to withdraw all the way to the green line. Israel and Palestine are suppose to negotiate on an everlasting settlement, which the US has been trying to enforce ( With Obama thats debatable). So US has no reason to allow a resolution about "illegal settlements" pass, since its a contradiction to their current policy. Hamas is still the political identity in Gaza and is still obligated under the Quartet to halt all violent actions against Israel. But with a future Palestinian state, I would love to see how fast Hamas will give up its power in Gaza for "statehood".
The truth is that every time there is a motion to condemn Israel in the Security Council, for whatever reason, always is vetoed by US, I dont know how many of the settlements are illegal, but periodically, are built some new, and this incurs the wrath of the Palestinians, and sincerely I can understand his anger.
About to Hamas, I basically agree with you, Hamas is a trouble for the peace. The Palestinian National Authority is very weak, they can not control Hamas, so I think that if Israel really wants peace, and the disappearance of Hamas, should help to can be a strong PNA
Again, how are the settlements illegal when the territory has no official occupier? I think you skipped the point where the UNSC has stated that the territory is disputed until both parties reach an agreement. So you support rockets arbitrarily being lobbied into Israel because of some houses being built in the West Bank; which the status of the WB could of been solved decades ago?
The conversation with you are very pleasant, but for me, discuss such a thrilling and complex topic, with my poor English is a very difficult task, I can not express myself as I wish, or display all my knowledge on the subject , therefore I will end the conversation sorry
![]()
I know, and the 446, 478, 3236, 1322 too
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...cerning_Israel
There is an important difference between UNSC resolutions and UNGA resolutions; the latter - fueled by anti-Israel bias in the General Assembly - are worthless.
UNSC 242 serves as the basis for peace-making efforts - land for peace - which is why it is central to understanding Israel's presence in the WB.
BTW
IDFNADESK published its own verison of this incident..