Thread: Ukraine discussion thread. Or the original Butthurt thread

  1. #1981
    Senior Member Jippo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    6,000

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hogan View Post
    She spoke very well.

  2. #1982
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ruthenius View Post
    These asumptions are absolutely irrelevant unless legal court finds them proved. Shall we talk about legitimacy's level of the putchist government again?
    Well how could they try him if he run away?

    My understanding of the impeachment process (and I am no laywer so I may be way off here) is that when impeached the person is removed from his/her position and then tried.

    Or are you claiming that the person being impeached should remain in position until a lenghty trial is over? That sounds rather strange to me.

  3. #1983
    Member Hogan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Roaming around the world.
    Posts
    768

    Default

    Is it just me or did Russia pretty much just essentially state that that they will not accept any UN or OSCE monitors in Ukraine?

  4. #1984
    Member Dforce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Edinburgh of the seven seas
    Posts
    606

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Universals View Post
    While true, you have to keep in mind that power has already improperly changed hands in Kiev and folks in power in Kiev isn't very sympathetic with Crimea.
    That is very true, just as in the case of Argentina and the Falklands, or India and Pakistan, or any such mutual dislikes. However, that do not give another country the right to meddle, and especially so if there is no real threat to the locals. Russia have real reasons to care about the area in question, and those should be concidered, but it acted premature and stupid here.
    Last edited by Dforce; 03-03-2014 at 05:30 PM. Reason: My English

  5. #1985
    Senior Member Henry's Fork's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Land of the Left and Rinos. Moonbeams Mess.
    Posts
    3,868

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jippo View Post
    She spoke very well.
    Started off with a ROFL.

    one might think that Moscow had just become the rapid response arm of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

  6. #1986
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Age
    43
    Posts
    82

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hisroyalhighness View Post
    x2.

    If Crimeans had chosen to break free and the New Regime attacked Crimea and killed Ethnic Russians, then by all means deploy forces.
    You finally allow Russians to deploy forses after dosens of Russians will be killed? Thank you! Will sit and wait until then...

  7. #1987
    Senior Member Universals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    peace to this young warrior without the sound of guns
    Posts
    8,079

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hogan View Post
    Sounds like the 16,000 is in addition to what was already there.
    Can that number (of additional troops) be confirmed (or plausibly estimated) in any way? cos it would be quite normal for Ukraine to exaggerate troop levels and for Russia to understate it.
    That last confirmation coming from the US side of things was for the 1500 troops flown into Crimea earlier.

  8. #1988
    Senior Member Holmes85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Wisconsin: The Land of Beer, Cheese, and Football.
    Age
    29
    Posts
    2,024

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Universals View Post
    While true, you have to keep in mind that power has already improperly changed hands in Kiev and folks in power in Kiev isn't very sympathetic with Crimea.
    Russia only escalated that situation with their invasion.

  9. #1989
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Loke2 View Post
    Well how could they try him if he run away?

    My understanding of the impeachment process (and I am no laywer so I may be way off here) is that when impeached the person is removed from his/her position and then tried.

    Or are you claiming that the person being impeached should remain in position until a lenghty trial is over? That sounds rather strange to me.
    Well, the legitimacy of the impeaching institution is not impeccable either. They pretty much had the Rada under street thug guard. No police, only loyalist Right Sector et al street fighters to provide "protection". Can we speak of a regular and valid parliamentary procedure when PoR deputies are in fear for their safety and their offices are ransacked? Let us be honest here.

    And Yanukovich is simply a crook but the Maidan crowd is hardly legitimate themselves.

  10. #1990
    Senior Member Asheren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Somewhere
    Age
    31
    Posts
    5,111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ruthenius View Post
    These asumptions are absolutely irrelevant unless legal court finds them proved. Shall we talk about legitimacy's level of the putchist government again?
    A very simple. He was removed from power due to his absence. Legit.
    It does not matter at this point if he was aftraid for his life since he litteraly vanished and authorites were unable to find wherever he was. By the time he showed up there was massive incriminating evidenca aginst him.
    This can be considered that he fleed to avoid prosecution and would make a damn solid case in court consdering that he was trying to destroy evidence. Soo when he unvanished he was already a wanted fugitive making him by definition incapable of leading the country.

  11. #1991
    Senior Member Hisroyalhighness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Finishing my time in Tartarus.
    Posts
    10,096

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Olegi1 View Post
    You finally allow Russians to deploy forses after dosens of Russians will be killed? Thank you! Will sit and wait until then...
    At least it will be justified, plus no one will cry "Russian Aggression" and we won't have this diplomatic and economic row.

  12. #1992
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    787

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Olegi1 View Post
    You finally allow Russians to deploy forses after dosens of Russians will be killed? Thank you! Will sit and wait until then...
    /SARCASM
    Quick! Poles and German minorities in Kaliningrad are oppressed and might be harmed in the future - lets take over that place with Polish and German army and after that lets hold referendum......

    /SARCASM

  13. #1993
    Senior Member Holmes85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Wisconsin: The Land of Beer, Cheese, and Football.
    Age
    29
    Posts
    2,024

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Universals View Post
    Can that number (of additional troops) be confirmed (or plausibly estimated) in any way? cos it would be quite normal for Ukraine to exaggerate troop levels and for Russia to understate it.
    That last confirmation coming from the US side of things was for the 1500 troops flown into Crimea earlier.
    You forget that a number of those troops are wearing uniforms with no identifications marks.

  14. #1994
    Senior Member Xaito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Age
    28
    Posts
    13,655

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hisroyalhighness View Post
    x2.

    If Crimeans had chosen to break free and the New Regime attacked Crimea and killed Ethnic Russians, then by all means deploy forces.
    that would have looked better on TV - though even then you'd get the same kind of crap as in 888 war. At least one advantage might be that Russia has shown it means business, so shooting doesn't start in the first place. If it came after shooting started, it would have had to be shooting too, at Ukrainians.

  15. #1995
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dforce View Post
    That is very true, just as in the case of Argentina and the Falklands, or India and Pakistan, or any such mutual dislikes. However, that do not give another country the right to meddle, and especially so if there is no real threat to the locals. Russia have real reasons to care about the area in question, and those should be concidered, but it acted premature and stupid here.
    Well, now we got to this topic of troop deployment.

    I am not rather versed in what happened in the beggining but did not Crimean acting authorities pretty much kick out PoR cadres out of the assembly and I believe they made a call to Russians? Or they simply started appearing on the streets?

    In any case, from a legal standpoint, we would need to study what allowances they BSF has under the treaty they (I guess still) have between Russia and Ukraine.

    How fast did the new Crimean authorities call for support?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •