Right now I'm reading some kind of internet forum which seems to revolve mostly around the military, politics, and utterly random crap.
The History of the Frankish Church
The Nicomachean Ethics
Fire and Stone
Right now I'm reading some kind of internet forum which seems to revolve mostly around the military, politics, and utterly random crap.
good book to read The Encyclopedia of Serial Killers it provides an in depth look at over 500 serial killers around the world
Originally Posted by walford
![]()
Know what you mean mate. Outside of the books I posted, I had to read, in October, Plato's book on the death of Socrates (I don't know its english name). Soon I'll have to start on Kant's "Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals": word around the campfire is that its a tough one.
![]()
Playboy............I get it for the articles.
If you're studying any of the social sciences, you will have to read a lot of garbage. Kant is pretty bad. Any of the Enlightenment philophers upon which the foundation of modern Leftist thought are based are wordy and obscure. Possibly to conceal the fact that what they have to say is bull**** -- that's called a tautology. Hegel is also a trial.Originally Posted by Yosy
I still think that Marx is probably the worst -- at least the English translations are anyway. He was supposedly a journalist too. In our journalism classes, people are taught to use an economy of words.
Man, you just discounted COMPLETELY Kant and MarxOriginally Posted by walford
...are you planning to become a teacher and preach...Hobbes for example?
![]()
Take it easy...almost every thinker has its own valuable contributions.
Yeah, and I'm Bruce LeeOriginally Posted by futurepilot2004
![]()
I'm planning to become a crank. Then when I get older I'll be a curmudgeon.Originally Posted by achilles
Yes, Marx contributed to the dialog by bringing up some very important subjects. His conclusions were completely wrong however. His Labor Theory of Value is good for a laugh -- if it weren't so goddamn boring.
You have to admit that the Enlightenment philosophers upon which freedom are based [Locke, Adam Smith, Bastiat, Mill] are a bit more comprehensible.
I've heard rave reviews about that, gonna buy it over the christmas holidays.Originally Posted by One_A
Can you give me a brief but un-revealing synopsis ? (sorry if there were any spelling mistakes)
I'm not studing social sciences, its just philosophy and psychology. Outside of Plato and Kant, we also have to study a third philosopher's work (its the teacher that chooses the work, not us). We still don't know who will be but some are saying that its Nietzsche's The Birth of Tragedy.Originally Posted by walford
Marx theories are, nowadays, seen as romantic and, although important for XIX century, are next to useless nowadays.
Marx = textbook theories that only work on paper. Incompatible with human kind.
“Constitutional Justice I – Constitutional Guaranty and Constitutional Control” by Carlos Blanco de Morais
“General Administrative Law I -Introduction and fundamental principles” by Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa and André Salgado Matos
“General Theory of Civil Law” by Pedro Pais de Vasconcelos
“The Economy’s Law”, by Eduardo Paz Ferreira
“Constitutional Law Manual”, volumes I, II, III, V and VI, by Jorge Miranda
And that’s Law College, for you guys, who have a real life...![]()
During my free time I’m trying to read “Diplomacy”, by Henry Kissinger and “War” by Von Clausewitz
----------
Yosy, I also had to read Kant in the 12th grade, and I actually learned to like it...Originally Posted by Yosy
![]()
I had Parménides, instead of Plato. Try to convince your teacher to let yoy read Bertrand Russel - it's much easier than Nietzsche...![]()
Hmmm... I'd tell you to save your money. It is probably the worst of all the Tom Clancy books I've read (which is all of them...)Originally Posted by -Jack-