Reply With Quote
Found these in another forum. Could understand the language but they spelled "SEALs" right.
40 mags is alot more practical with 5.56 and 20 rd clips. That I could believe. Especially without body armor.
Found these in another forum. Could understand the language but they spelled "SEALs" right.
Finally some pics.
I'm pretty sure none of those are SEAL's. In fact IIRC the first and last ones are confirmed Army SF.
Originally Posted by Pook2
Noone cares atleast were are not discussing how many fvcking mags a SEAL carries.
Fast guys.... wtf does IIRC mean????
Yes I'm a noob
If I recall correctly.
... and suddenly I feel so slow...
Haha true.Noone cares atleast were are not discussing how many fvcking mags a SEAL carries.
1st picture=Army SF fighting with Marines in Fallujah, Nov. 2004
2nd Picture=No idea, never seen it before.
3rd Picture=I believe Army SF engaging target in Najaf, 2004.
4th Picture=Army SF in either Baghdad or Ramadi, 2005-2006.
That's just what I remember from the captions. But I could most certainly be wrong and so could the captions.
those are some nice pics =]
Pretty sure 2 is FR marines, it was posted with that caption here before
Damn. I had serious doubts about the guy's helmet on the last pic.
I believe 1 and 2 are both MFR.
All Army SF, except the 3rd one, which is a SEAL
I've been out of town.
If you are feeling froggy, then carry 40 mags, then go swiming.
Posting Permissions
