Page 17 of 831 FirstFirst ... 79101112131415161718192021222324252767117517 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 255 of 12461

Thread: Dutch military pictures

  1. #241
    Senior Member sp2c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden
    Posts
    10,544

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ipkiss
    So:
    Soldier Modernisation Package (rucksack, sleeping bags, camelbak etc etc)
    Upgraded guns
    New shoes
    Bushmasters
    Thank you Henk Kamp!
    extra chinooks, 1 dc10, 2 c130's, bvs10 Viking, Boxer, CV90, Alladin mini UAV were all decided on by mister Kamp

    on the other hand
    4 M frigates, all B105 Bolkows and P3C Orions, a number of F16's, Leopard2's and pzh2000's and more were sold/scrapped

    I like the guy personally he seems well involved with the troops but I hate what the government did to the military

  2. #242
    Senior Member sp2c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden
    Posts
    10,544

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Javaa
    gheghe, ur a 'tukker' sp2c?
    nah I live in a city

  3. #243
    Senior Member Frost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,553

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sp2c
    extra chinooks, 1 dc10, 2 c130's, bvs10 Viking, Boxer, CV90, Alladin mini UAV were all decided on by mister Kamp

    on the other hand
    4 M frigates, all B105 Bolkows and P3C Orions, a number of F16's, Leopard2's and pzh2000's and more were sold/scrapped

    I like the guy personally he seems well involved with the troops but I hate what the government did to the military
    And he closed down Twente Airport. I live next to it and totally loved that fvcking airport and the sound of the airplanes flying over

    But indeed Kamp tries to do the best. He knows it's impossible to do everything, because there's not enough money. So the most important things have to be done. And sadly enough twente airport and the L and M frigats were not the most important. Besides we got 4 LCF's which are much better than the M and L frigates anyway.

    The operational units like the Marine Corps need the money now. That's where we're heading; to infantry and light armor units for global operations. The Marine Corps will get it's second support ship in the form of a second LPD (sistership of the Hr.Ms. Rotterdam) and new choppers (NH90) will improve the airlifting capabilities of the Marine Corps. The Bsv10 Viking will finally provide the RNLMC with an armored all-terrain vehicle. The only really major thing left on the RNLMC most-wanted-list is a light armored patrol vehicle like a light armored jeep. The unarmored laro's is like driving a fvcking golfkart into battle.

    The Army is getting the Fennek and the Boxer which will replace a number of vehicles. The Boxer is still a bit uncertain though, since there were a few price-issues. These vehicles are a great addition to the arsenal and are a real improvement compared to the YPR's they'll replace.
    We don't really use the leo's anyway and the Pzh2000 is really great, but we don't need that many of them. So I don't really care about selling a few of them. Improve the remaining leo's and buy more stuff that is really needed (don't forget personal gear like new armor, boots, vests, goggles ect).

  4. #244
    Senior Member sp2c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden
    Posts
    10,544

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frost
    And he closed down Twente Airport. I live next to it and totally loved that fvcking airport and the sound of the airplanes flying over
    it's the sound of freedom

    but I don't really care about bases, I think closing a number of bases was the smartest thing he did, saves a crapload of money and since there's no war looming on the horizon we don't really need to spread our military around the country anyways, they can close them all down imo save for a handfull of superbases

    I'd rather see them close camps down then units (and valuable skillsets)
    But indeed Kamp tries to do the best. He knows it's impossible to do everything, because there's not enough money. So the most important things have to be done. And sadly enough twente airport and the L and M frigats were not the most important. Besides we got 4 LCF's which are much better than the M and L frigates anyway.
    The LCF's replaced the L frigates but the M frigates are really a totally different thing, you can't replace them with LCF's (or patrolboats for that matter unless they decide on those c00l sigma corvettes )
    The operational units like the Marine Corps need the money now. That's where we're heading; to infantry and light armor units for global operations. The Marine Corps will get it's second support ship in the form of a second LPD (sistership of the Hr.Ms. Rotterdam) and new choppers (NH90) will improve the airlifting capabilities of the Marine Corps. The Bsv10 Viking will finally provide the RNLMC with an armored all-terrain vehicle. The only really major thing left on the RNLMC most-wanted-list is a light armored patrol vehicle like a light armored jeep. The unarmored laro's is like driving a fvcking golfkart into battle.

    The Army is getting the Fennek and the Boxer which will replace a number of vehicles. The Boxer is still a bit uncertain though, since there were a few price-issues. These vehicles are a great addition to the arsenal and are a real improvement compared to the YPR's they'll replace.
    We don't really use the leo's anyway and the Pzh2000 is really great, but we don't need that many of them. So I don't really care about selling a few of them. Improve the remaining leo's and buy more stuff that is really needed (don't forget personal gear like new armor, boots, vests, goggles ect).
    wel up untill 1995 we said the same thing about the F16, never used them so we should get rid of them, we should not place our eggs in one basket
    who knows maybe next year we'll start using main battle tanks I don't know

  5. #245
    Senior Member Frost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,553

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sp2c
    The LCF's replaced the L frigates but the M frigates are really a totally different thing, you can't replace them with LCF's (or patrolboats for that matter unless they decide on those c00l sigma corvettes )


    wel up untill 1995 we said the same thing about the F16, never used them so we should get rid of them, we should not place our eggs in one basket
    who knows maybe next year we'll start using main battle tanks I don't know
    The LCF has MUCH more firepower than a regular L-frigat. In terms of firepower the LCF could be classified as destroyers, but since the size of the ship is too small it can't be classified as a destroyer and now it's a frigat. So replacing the M-frigates with LCF's is not really a problem. You must understand that the old L-frigates had no cannon. They were really just for airdefense (although they did have harpoon-missiles against other ships). The M-frigates had everything (hence the "multi-purpose"). The LCF also has everything: air-defense and surface to surface including a 127mm canon which is much heavier than the 76mm on the M-frigats. So in terms of weaponary the LCF is a mix of the L and M frigat and better than both.

    And I didn't say we should scrap all MBT's. But I don't mind selling a few if it means we can upgrade the other ones to a higher standard and invest in the Fennek and Boxer vehicles.

  6. #246
    Senior Member sp2c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden
    Posts
    10,544

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frost
    The LCF has MUCH more firepower than a regular L-frigat. In terms of firepower the LCF could be classified as destroyers, but since the size of the ship is too small it can't be classified as a destroyer and now it's a frigat. So replacing the M-frigates with LCF's is not really a problem. You must understand that the old L-frigates had no cannon. They were really just for airdefense (although they did have harpoon-missiles against other ships). The M-frigates had everything (hence the "multi-purpose"). The LCF also has everything: air-defense and surface to surface including a 127mm canon which is much heavier than the 76mm on the M-frigats. So in terms of weaponary the LCF is a mix of the L and M frigat and better than both.
    yeah that's the problem ... using an LCF for a naval blockade or patrol and escort work seems a bit overkill to me
    And I didn't say we should scrap all MBT's. But I don't mind selling a few if it means we can upgrade the other ones to a higher standard and invest in the Fennek and Boxer vehicles.
    yeah I know

    I just don't like the whole 'we don't use them anyways' argument
    in the end we should just start spending more money on our military

  7. #247
    Senior Member Frost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,553

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sp2c
    I just don't like the whole 'we don't use them anyways' argument
    in the end we should just start spending more money on our military
    SP2C for president
    Look, I too would like our country to spend more money on the military and Kamp and Berlijn both say we should, but unfortunately they are not the ones that decide these things. And the arrgumant about us not using the Leo's. Unfortunately it's true. I would have loved seeing them in Iraq, but they weren't really needed there and in Afghanistan the mountaineous terrain makes them useless. So if you need to choose between keeping all leo's or selling a few and buy light armor that we do use, than I'll choose the latter. But of course it would be better if we didn't have to choose and buy light armor and keep all the leo's.

    btw;
    What's wrong with overkill? That's the way I like it. Playing fair is not my game

  8. #248
    Senior Member sp2c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden
    Posts
    10,544

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frost
    SP2C for president
    Look, I too would like our country to spend more money on the military and Kamp and Berlijn both say we should, but unfortunately they are not the ones that decide these things. And the arrgumant about us not using the Leo's. Unfortunately it's true. I would have loved seeing them in Iraq, but they weren't really needed there and in Afghanistan the mountaineous terrain makes them useless. So if you need to choose between keeping all leo's or selling a few and buy light armor that we do use, than I'll choose the latter. But of course it would be better if we didn't have to choose and buy light armor and keep all the leo's.
    imo Al Muthanna didn't need Dutch troops at all we should've deployed to Basra or even further down the road with all our pretty toys

    that was like sending a police swat team to stand outside a night club checking people for sportschoenen

    it was embarrassing

    I don't think we should even be tailoring our military around peacekeeping at all, it's primary job is the defence of our territories, overseas deployments are a bonus.
    I don't like the whole push for light armour because it's basically only usefull for light duties, but when there's a real war on we'd have to rely on others to duke it out

    hell we should get the ministry of foreign affairs to pay peacekeeping costs

    btw;
    What's wrong with overkill? That's the way I like it. Playing fair is not my game
    true that!

    but it's expensive, a hopeless waste of valuable resources

  9. #249
    Member Ipkiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Age
    32
    Posts
    437

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brabo
    But if you look what kind of pack the Lowe
    Stingray replace, then you would be happy.
    Hehe well unfortunately I can recall the days with the old harness and rucksack. Hell, I had to wait more than a year before the bilaminate parka was issued, that was bad.
    But anyway, it just makes me wonder why the didn't put a bit more effort in the belt, it leaves the backpack just not perfect.
    The old backpack had 1 big advantage. Since it was so tiny you could not carry too much with you, but now with the 55ltr people try to take as much as possible with them. Must be a Dutch thing haha.
    Fortunately enough my backpack is going where it belongs; in the storage room of my Leo, I'm heading for the tank platoon commanders course in Amersfoort after the holidays. (already been a loader and driver.)

  10. #250
    Senior Member Frost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,553

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sp2c
    I don't think we should even be tailoring our military around peacekeeping at all, it's primary job is the defence of our territories, overseas deployments are a bonus.
    I don't like the whole push for light armour because it's basically only usefull for light duties, but when there's a real war on we'd have to rely on others to duke it out
    How! The expeditionary nature of the modern military has to do with the modern type of small conflicts. It's not about peace-keeping. Afghanistan has little to do with peace-keeping, although I must admit it's the first major mission of it's kind for the modern dutch military. Note that I say 'major' since there have been smaller (covert) combat operations, but those only involve a small number of men and more in the SOF-type of mission than regular military.
    The primary job of our military is protecting our territories , our civilans and our country's interest, both here and overseas. So overseas deployments are not a bonus. What we do in Afghanistan prevents terrorists from taking over again and thus helps in the fight against terrorist that might target our country, so it's a form of protecting our territories.


    Light armor is needed, because heavy armor can't be used everywhere. Narrow streets of towns and mountaineous terrain call for lighter armor. Right now we only have heavy armor, YPR's and the heavy Patria. All unsuited for the job. The BsV10 Viking is a very welcome addition. For patrol duties in populated area's where you want to have contact with the locals you'll also need light armored vehicles instead of a heavy tank rumbling down the street. The alternative for the tank or heavy patria right now is the unarmoured jeep.

  11. #251
    Senior Member sp2c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden
    Posts
    10,544

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frost
    How! The expeditionary nature of the modern military has to do with the modern type of small conflicts. It's not about peace-keeping. Afghanistan has little to do with peace-keeping, although I must admit it's the first major mission of it's kind for the modern dutch military. Note that I say 'major' since there have been smaller (covert) combat operations, but those only involve a small number of men and more in the SOF-type of mission than regular military.
    The primary job of our military is protecting our territories , our civilans and our country's interest, both here and overseas. So overseas deployments are not a bonus. What we do in Afghanistan prevents terrorists from taking over again and thus helps in the fight against terrorist that might target our country, so it's a form of protecting our territories.
    yeah I don't buy it, ISAF is peacekeeping imho, it is exactly the same mission as SFIR, except it's in a hotter area

    don't get me wrong preventing terrorrists to take over Afghanistan again is a just cause and I'm all for it but it's not in our national interest, we have virtually no civilians in the country nor do we have any economical or even military interests in the region and if we want to use our military to prevent terrorist attacks then we should let the 13th mechanized battallion patrol downtown Amsterdam

    Light armor is needed, because heavy armor can't be used everywhere. Narrow streets of towns and mountaineous terrain call for lighter armor. Right now we only have heavy armor, YPR's and the heavy Patria. All unsuited for the job. The BsV10 Viking is a very welcome addition. For patrol duties in populated area's where you want to have contact with the locals you'll also need light armored vehicles instead of a heavy tank rumbling down the street. The alternative for the tank or heavy patria right now is the unarmoured jeep.
    sure it's needed but it can't be a substitute for heavy armour you can't replace a Leopard with a viking and if we can't afford that then we should not be doing multiple overseas missions at one time or even none at all

  12. #252
    Senior Member Eggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,245

    Default

    Does enyone have pictures of the BsV10 Viking, I tried searching on a couple of military sites but nothing comes up.

    And too bad they don't have a photosite for our TFU like with NLDET Irak had.

  13. #253
    Member Quack of Doom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Amsterdam, avoiding drunk Englishmen
    Age
    27
    Posts
    631

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eggy
    Does enyone have pictures of the BsV10 Viking, I tried searching on a couple of military sites but nothing comes up.

    And too bad they don't have a photosite for our TFU like with NLDET Irak had.
    is this of any use? http://www.haborumuveszete.hu/rovato...vs-10_holland/

  14. #254
    Senior Member Eggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quack of Doom
    Yup thanks, I think my friend took a picture of one of those during the Vlootdagen. I was wondering what it was.

  15. #255
    Member Xlimit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    523

    Default

    Hey all.. back from Holiday, found some pics. Enjoy!







Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •