Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 79

Thread: Husaria - polish winged cavalry.

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    439

    Default Husaria - polish winged cavalry.

    Between first half of XVI century (1514 battle of Orsza) to the end of XVII century (1683 battle of Vienna) Poland had the best cavalry unit in history of civilisation.


    Husaria was heavy, armoured cavalry which was as fast as light eastern cavalry but had a power and armours stronger than western heavy cavalry.
    Husarz (soldier of Husaria) was armed in excellent sabre - far better than japanese sword
    http://www.notsmallmall.com/Poland_b...r_6442585.html
    also with a pistol or two (sometimes heavy pistols - bandolets), 15-foot-long lance and koncerz - a kind of long spade/rapier used to pierce armour. Husarz could hit by his lance a ring when he was riding at full speed!
    Most famous thing in Husarz`s armour were wings. It is unclear if it was really used during battles. Some historicians said that it was used - wings were used to scare enemy horses and to prevent from catching Husarz on arkan (lasso). Some other say that wings were used only at ceremonial occasions (like funerals).



    Husaria won almost all battles. It lost only when was used in wrong way (for example in mud or forrest). The most famous battle won by Husaria was battle at Kircholm in 1605



    Poland had 3500 (or 4000) soldiers under command of Jan Karol Chodkiewicz:



    Husaria: 1900
    Infantry: 1000
    Light cavalry: 300
    Heavy cavalry Rajtaria: 300
    Guns: 4-7

    Swedish had 11000 soldiers or more under command of King Carol IX:
    Heavy cavalry Rajtaria : 5000 or more
    Infantry: 6000 or more
    Guns 11 or more.
    Swedish army was completely annihilated - at least 6000 swedish soldiers were killed (including Fryderyk prince of Lünebug). Swedish king Carol IX was injured and all swedish banners and guns were captured. We lost about 100 soldiers!!

    Other great battle was Battle at Chocim in 1673 when 29000 polish soldiers (number of Husarzs: 1690) slaughteret army of Turkey (30000 soldiers). Only slightly more than 5000 enemy soldiers survived!



    Sorry for that word "Husarzs" but I don`t know how to translate "two or more members of Husaria". Also other words were difficulity to translate so don`t be angry



    During batles with Husaria often enemy soldiers were fleeing in panic when Husaria had just started to charge - before real fight! So - enemy had a choice - fight and die or run and die

  2. #2
    Senior Member Marmot1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    4,131

    Default

    Few more photos (from movies and reenactments) and pictures.





    The Husaria wore these wooden arcs with eagle feathers as a psychological weapon: apparently it makes a frightening sound. The superior officers also wore the skin of a tiger or leopard over their shoulders, as a symbol of valour.


    "For over a century, the Husaria were the lords of the battlefield, delivering the decisive blow in many an important engagement; at Kircholm (1605) 3,900 Poles accounted for 13,500 Swedes, at Klushino (1610) 6,000 Poles (of only 200 were infantry) defeated 30,000 Muscovite and 5,000 German and Scottish mercenaries, at Gniew on the onset of the Deluge in the midst of agonizing defeats everywhere (1656) 5,500 Polish cavalry defeated 13,000 Swedes and outside Vienna (1683) the Husaria saved Europe from the, until then, unstoppable might of the Ottoman Empire. In 1699, the remnants of the once mighty army of the Commonwealth defeated the Tartars & Turks at Podhajce, the final engagement of the Poles with the Ottomans."






    King Bathory at Pskov by Jan Matejko (1838-1893)

    Polish Winged Hussar Armor and Horse Tack, on display in a Polish Museum

    gallery in english:
    http://www.geocities.com/rik_fox/husaria/museum.html

  3. #3
    Senior Member wholagun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,722

    Default

    **** Marmot, you beat me to it.. damn it, i was gonna do a post of this type, I got know a good site that got great science behind Hussarias success in the battle field, they were years ahead in cavalry thinking, ill post it later when i get back from class.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Rantanplan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    7,877

    Default

    Some of the pics are from Ogniem i mieczem, right?

  5. #5
    Senior Member Rantanplan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    7,877

    Default

    Great post Btw.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,269

    Default Re: Husaria - polish winged cavalry.

    Quite interesting. The Finns had a as I´ve understood it a feared cavalry
    in the Hakkapeliitas (nowadays that name is probably most famous because
    of the Nokia Hakkapeliitta tyre). The name was given to them by the forces
    they met, because their battle cry was "Hakkaa päälle (pohjan poika)" which
    would translate to "Charge, men of the north!" or alternatively "Slash for the head".
    Obviously, with constant war these were probably quite bad ass (not that unusual
    back in the days I guess).


    Europe before the 30-year war (1630). Both Poland and Sweden were quite large back then


    During one of the numerous battles of the 30-year war


    Swedish forces crossing the river Lech, this was one of the first times in the
    war history where smoke was used, this was used as a distraction while a couple
    of Hakkapelitas swimmed over the river (with a rope) armed only with knives.
    The soldiers got plenty of gold as reward afterwards



    Swedish king getting killed in the battle of Lützen 1632, the Finnish cavalry,
    the Hakkapeliitas was responsible for the protection of the king, but the king that
    had a bad eyesight charged the enemy alone(!) and got killed before the cavalry
    could move in and protect him


    ______________________________________________

    As for the Swedish-Polish battles mentioned here, well here is the Swedish version:

    Kirkholm 1605 is referred to in Sweden as "the forgotten catastrophy"
    11.000 Swedes forces against 3600 Polish, the Swedish side had losses of
    about 9500 men while the Polish side lost a couple of hundred. Yes I give you
    right on that one.

    Warszawa 1656, is referred to in Sweden as "Three days in July", a long
    and bloody battle that lasted three days. Swedish troops of 9500 men and 8500
    troops from Brandenburg against Polish troops of 36.000-40.000 men. The Poles
    lost about 2600 soldiers while the other (our) side lost 1300 men. The Poles
    retreated and the result was that Warszawa (spelling spelling) fell in our hands.
    So I wouldn´t exactly call that something succesful from a Polish point of view.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Herrmannek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Poland, Festung Breslau, Car Trunk: In the rear with the gear, tip: Never Forget Poland
    Age
    32
    Posts
    12,118

    Default

    Hussaria – Polish Winged Cavalry

    By Slawek K. Grzechnik, http://home.san.rr.com/slawek/
    Jan 25, 2000 mailto:slawek@san.rr.com



    Name and Origins

    There is no English equivalent for "hussaria", Polish armored cavalry of the 16th and 17th centuries. This name should not be confused with that of the huzars, the light cavalry used in the 18th and 19th centuries by European armies. The name "husar" in the 14th century denoted a mounted knight in southern Slavic languages. As the Turkish empire expanded deeper into Southern Europe in the 14th and 15th centuries, many refugees found themselves in Hungary, where they were welcomed because of their experience in fighting against Turks. Troops of "husars" were then formed in Hungary. Thanks to their contact with the advanced military arts of the East, the "husar" troops fought as units capable of maneuvering on the battlefield. The technique was quite new in Europe at the time: a typical knights’ battle was a series of duels which commanders had very little influenced over once started.

    Poland had very close ties with Hungary, and by the end of the 15th century the first hussar troops were created to serve as light cavalry. In a few generations they evolved into armored assault cavalry, which was unique in all of Europe, the pride of the Polish army until the end of the 17th century. The Polish warfare evolved differently than that of western Europeans, whose infantry was becoming much more important than cavalry. Several factors caused this unique evolution:

    * Territory and distance.
    Until the 17th century, the Commonwealth of the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was still expanding, reaching nearly 1million km2 (about 390,000 square miles). Distances were large compared to other parts of Europe and armies were required to move quickly, so cavalry became predominant.

    * Diversity of enemies
    Because of the location of the Commonwealth formed by the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, it was the bridge between East and West. At the time of interest it had borders with:
    - Russia in the Northeast. Russia was not yet a super power, but its strength was growing and clashes were escalating.
    - Tartars in the Southeast, the remnants of Genghis Khan’s successors onslaught on Europe during the 13th century. They were a troublesome enemy who made yearly raids on the southern part of the state.
    - Turkey in the South. Moslem Turkey was a super power of the time. In the 17th century, Turkey’s European holdings included Greece, all of the Balkans, today’s Romania, and Hungary, and it was close to conquering the Austrian Empire and other parts of Europe.
    - Austrian Empire and German States in the West
    - Sweden in the North. Sweden was then a very aggressive state, already occupying today’s Finland, Latvia, Estonia, and Northern Germany, with aspirations of becoming the dominant Baltic power.

    Each of the neighbors applied different military techniques, so Poland and Lithuania had to invent their own tactics to face each one.

    * Great commanders
    In the 16th and 17th centuries, Poland and Lithuania produced a succession of great commanders-in-chief which was without precedence in its history, and has not been eclipsed since. A chronological list of the names includes: Konstanty Ostrogski, Jan Tarnowski, Stefan Batory (King), Jan Zamoyski, Mikolaj Radziwil, Krzysztof Radziwil, Karol Chodkiewicz, Stanislaw Zolkiewski, Stanislaw Lubomirski, Stanislaw Koniecpolski, Jeremi Wisniowiecki, Stefan Czarniecki, and Jan Sobieski (King).

    * Polish ideals of manhood during the Renaissance and early Baroque
    Young men of nobility, besides acquiring an education, were expected to spend at least a few years in military service and later join the army when the need arose. From childhood, they were raised to be excellent horsemen and men-at-arms. Thus they were first-class military material.

    Due to these factors, cavalry usually constituted 80% of Polish forces during most campaigns. Hussaria was assault cavalry, whose main task was breaching enemy formations with charges at top speed. Its role was similar to that of armored divisions used to break lines during WWII.



    Armor, Armament and Wings

    Hussaria was the cream of the Polish army and mainly, though not exclusively, nobility served in its ranks and files. Once in service, soldiers were paid, but they were responsible for equipping themselves and their squires at considerable cost. To start with, each soldier and his squires had to have good horses. The armor was light for speed and protected the arms and upper parts of the body. The armament consisted of 15-foot-long lances (the only equipment provided by the King), sabers, estocs (piercing rapiers), and pistols. Long firearms were recommended, but not required until the late 17th century. Many soldiers had bows, which (especially Tartar or Turkish bows) still had better range and were easier to use than early firearms.

    The famous wings were not obligatory; however, many soldiers of hussaria used them. The wings were light wooden frames with rows of feathers and were attached to the back of the armor, sometimes to the saddle. Their purpose was not just decorative. During high-speed charges, the wings produced a buzzing sound which frightened enemy horses and disturbed enemy troops who saw winged horsemen charging at them. Also, the Tartars’ lasso, or "arkan", was difficult to use against soldiers with wings protruding above their heads. Wings, though not universally used, were the distinctive feature of hussaria and became its symbol. Today, hussaria wings are present in emblems of the Polish Air Force and Armored Divisions.


    Battle Tactics

    Hussaria was considered to be heavy assault cavalry only by the Polish and Lithuanian army. The West did not have this type of cavalry, and hussaria was considered light by western standards of speed and tactics. The main task of hussaria during battle was to breach enemy formations. Polish commanders of the 16th and 17th centuries realized that the effectiveness of firearms was still very limited, so a charge by good horsemen had to endure at most one salvo before reaching the enemy with lances and sabers. This was sound reasoning, and hussaria won most battles they fought, in many cases against foes of far greater numbers. Victory by outnumbered forces is nothing special in the history of warfare provided that the troops used are well trained and bolstered with high morale. This was the case of hussaria for the span of nearly two centuries.

    In the initial phases of a charge, hussaria loosened and tightened their formation a few times in order to diminish the effect of enemy fire. The charge was started at low speed and riders accelerated during its progress, reaching top speed just before the enemy. This not only preserved the horses’ strength, but also had psychological effects on the enemy who saw the preliminaries to the charge. Extremely long but light lances were used to break opponents’ formations, and were supposed to break during the clash. After the lances were gone, sabers and estocs were used.

    When the first charge was not successful, hussaria withdrew and charged again. There were battles in which the same troops charged 10 times and later helped pursue the enemy. This was possible only with highly trained units that could withdraw and regroup in an orderly manner.

    Except in a few cases, casualties suffered by hussaria were very low, and this was the best proof of their worth, as well as proof of the talent of Polish commanders of the time.

    The list of major battles won by Polish and Lithuanian armies using hussaria is given in the appendix. A short description of the famous battle of Vienna follows.


    Battle of Vienna, Sep 12, 1683

    This battle is classified by historians as one of the most decisive battles of the world. The Turkish Empire was then at the peak of its power and occupied most of southeastern Europe. A powerful Turkish army of 110,000 led by Grand Vizier Kara Mustafa laid siege to Vienna in August 1683. The Turks’ seizure of the city would mean the fall of the Austrian Empire, leaving the middle of Europe open to Turkish invasion, and would probably have changed the course of history of Christendom and European civilization.

    Part of the Austrian army defended the city. The rest, though bolstered by German troops, were unable to face the Turks on their own, so awaited the coming of the Polish army. Polish relations with Austria and Germans were not very friendly, but the King of Poland, Jan III Sobieski, understood very well that the fall of Vienna would be disastrous for his country and the rest of Europe. In the spring of 1683, a pact of mutual aid against Turkish attack was signed between the Polish King and the Holy Roman Emperor Leopold I of Austria.

    The Polish army of 27,000 soldiers, half of which was cavalry including 3,300 hussars, was assembled in the second half of August, and because of the gravity of the situation the King marched south, not waiting for the Lithuanians. Near Vienna, Polish forces were joined by Austrian and German troops, and the allied army totaled about 75,000 soldiers. According to the pact, the Polish King became the commander-in-chief. His military genius and victories over past 20 years were all too well known. During the council of war on Sep 3, the King devised a battle plan for the allied forces.

    On Sep 12, the army approached Vienna and took positions against the Turks besieging the city. A small hussaria unit was sent to charge enemy lines to examine the terrain and explore the possibility of an all-out assault. The result was positive, and in spite of the late afternoon start, the King decided to attack with all allied cavalry to prevent the Turks from preparing stronger defenses. Polish hussaria attacked in the center and on the right wing and took the Turkish camp, together with the palace-like tents of Kara Mustafa and an enormous booty. The Austrians and Germans charged on the left and also broke enemy lines. The Turkish army was completely defeated. The war lasted a few more months, but from that day on, the Turkish Empire was on retreat in southeast Europe.

    Turkish standards and other trophies were sent to the Pope in Rome and victory was celebrated with solemn masses all over Europe.

    Legend has it that the habit of drinking coffee was spread in Europe after the battle. This is only partially true and may be the case for only Vienna and its famous coffee. In Poland, coffee became popular 10 years earlier after the second battle of Khotin in 1673. In southern Europe, coffee was known prior to the battle.

    In 1690 one of the constellations was named "Scutum Sobieskii" (Sobieski’s Shield) to commemorate the battle.

    to top

    Appendix: Battles won with Hussaria

    Here is a list of major battles won by Polish and Lithuanian forces in the 16th and 17th centuries, some won solely by cavalry. Where the army was led by Lithuanian commanders, a note is made.

    * 1514 – Orsza, against Russia. Pictures of this battle show hussaria already equipped with wings. Commander Konstanty Ostrogski of Lithuania
    * 1531 – Obertyn, against Moldavia. Commander Jan Tarnowski
    * 1579-1581 – three succesful wars against Russia with cavalry raids. Commanders King Stefan Batory, Jan Zamoyski, Mikolaj, and Krzysztof Radziwil of Lithuania. During Stefan Batory's reign King's Regulations were issued giving hussaria its final shape
    * 1588 –Byczyna, against domestic rebels and Austrian troops. Commander Jan Zamoyski
    * 1595 – Solonica, against Ukrainian rebels. Commander Stanislaw Zolkiewski
    * 1605 – Kircholm, pure cavalry battle against Swedes. Commander Karol Chodkiewicz of Lithuania
    * 1610 – Kluszyn, pure cavalry battle against Russians. Commander Stanislaw Zolkiewski. The battle in which some hussaria units attacked ten times
    * 1621 – defense of trenches near Khotin against Turkish army. Together with other troops, hussaria were used in and outside the trenches. Commanders Karol Chodkiewicz of Lithuania and Stanislaw Lubomirski
    * 1629 – Trzciana, pure cavalry battle against Swedes. Commander Stanislaw Koniecpolski
    * 1637 – Kumejki, against Ukrainian rebels. Commander Mikolaj Potocki

    * 1644 – Ochmatow against Tatars, Commanders Stanislaw Koniecpolski and Jeremi Wisniowiecki
    * 1649 – defense of trenches of Zbarazh against Ukrainian rebels and Tatars. As in Khotin, hussaria were used with other troops in and outside the trenches. Commander Jeremi Wisniowiecki
    * 1651 – Beresteczko against Ukrainian rebels and Tartars. Commanders King Jan Kazimierz and Jeremi Wisniowiecki
    * 1656 – battle of Warsaw against Swedes. An incredible charge of hussaria led by Aleksander Polubinski of Lithuania saved the Polish-Lithuanian army despite their losing the battle
    * 1660s – battles against Swedes and rebelling Ukrainians. Commander Stefan Czarniecki
    * late 1660s – numerous battles against Tartars and Turks. Commander Jan Sobieski
    * 1673 – Khotin again. This time besieging an entrenched Turkish army. Hussaria were used
    * for the final assault once breaches in the trenches were done. Commander Jan Sobieski was crowned King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania next year.
    * 1683 – relief of Vienna besieged by Turkish army. One of the battles that decided the fate of Europe. Commander Jan III Sobieski King of Poland


    Sources:

    1. Cichowski, Jerzy. Husaria /, Jerzy Cichowski, Andrzej Szulczynski. Wyd. Warszawa : Wydawn. Ministerstwa Obrony Narodowej, 1977
    2. Ksiega jazdy polskiej /, [autorzy Boleslaw Wieniawa-Dlugoszowski ... et al.]. Warszawa : [s.n.], 1938
    3. Jasienica, Pawel. Rzeczpospolita obojga narodów. English. The Commonwealth of both nations/, by Pawel Jasienica ; translated by Alexander Jordan. Miami : American Institute of Polish Culture ; New York: Hippocrene Books, 1987
    4. Rosciszewski, Piotr. Szlak Husarii Polskiej : przewodnik /, Piotr Rosciszewski. Wyd. Gliwice : Polskie Towarzystwo Turystyczno-Krajoznawcze. Oddzial w Gliwicach, 1984
    5. Microsoft Encarta 2000, keyword: Sobieski

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Polska, Warszawa
    Posts
    97

    Default


    Hussars charge at the Battle of Vienna

    olish Winged Hussars pass in review by Wojciech Kossak (1857-1942)

    I'm not sure but i think that in the background You can see one of otoman tents captured by polish forces during the battle - they are exhibited in Museum of Polish Army in Warsaw

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Polska, Warszawa
    Posts
    97

    Default



    How sweet - Operation Ive would say

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,269

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Herrmannek
    * 1656 – battle of Warsaw against Swedes. An incredible charge of hussaria led by Aleksander Polubinski of Lithuania saved the Polish-Lithuanian army despite their losing the battle
    Hm yes, isn´t it said that Poland was very close to get defeated (which of course
    would have happened if their army would have been asskicked in that battle),
    but the Hussars saved them.

    I´ve been thinking a little about that word. We have it in Sweden as well, Is it a
    Polish word originally? In example "Smålands husarer" that was formed in 1543,
    but I don´t know when they started calling them self hussars. There was also
    in example "Skånska Husarregementet", but this was formed first in 1703. I
    think the pictures shows early 19th century Swedish hussars.







    http://www.eksjo.se/linneskolan/itis...ld/Karolin.jpg
    One of the Swedish veterans of the campaign against Poland
    in the 18th century

  11. #11
    Senior Member Rantanplan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    7,877

    Default

    I think this Swedish Husar regiment was trained an uniformed after Hungarian pattern. Hungarin Husars became verry popular in europe in the late 17th century. But they have nothing in common with polish Hussars. As far I know the Hussaria turned during the 18 century to Uhlans (still fighting with lances but no bodyarmot) and was still used in WW2.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Polska, Warszawa
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Well i think that You are talking about huZars not huSaras - those are 2 different cavalry units - huzars were light hungarian cavalry (orginali hungarian but in other countries ther were huzaria units as well - they were modeled on hungarian units its similar situation like with lansjers which were orginaly polish unit) and husaria was polish havy cavalry - as You can see they used different equipment and they were dressed in different manner.

    But to answer Your question - I think polish "husaria" word come from hungarian "huzaria" word - in Poland light cavalary based on hungarian one called "racka" become heavy one with own tactic and equipment, become "husaria"

    hope You were able to understand my poor English

    http://www.eksjo.se/linneskolan/itis...ld/Karolin.jpg
    One of the Swedish veterans of the campaign against Poland
    in the 18th century
    I am afraid that in XVIII century our country started to by weaker and weaker and finaly and finaly disappeared in 1795 for 123 years

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Polska, Warszawa
    Posts
    97

    Default

    As far I know the Hussaria turned during the 18 century to Uhlans (still fighting with lances but no bodyarmot) and was still used in WW2.
    I dont know if ther is a proper word in english but in polish ther are two different words - "kopia" i "lanca"

    "kopia" - those were lances used by medieval knights (about 4m of lenght) - like this one:


    husaria also used "kopii" but these were longer (about 5 - 5,5m of lenght) and hollow inside - after the first strike "kopia" was broken and then husarz was using koncerz - kind of very long sword (up to 1,6m of lengt) like this on:


    "lanca" is quite different weapon then "kopia" - it is much shorter (about 2,7m of lenght) and the rider is able to strike with it in every direction - "lanca" looks like this:

  14. #14
    Senior Member Marmot1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    4,131

    Default

    The world Hussar apeared in polish chronicles for the first time in year 1500 and yes there is diference betwer Huzar and Husar the first one is hungarian (orginally) light cavalery second one is polish heavy cavalery.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantanplan
    I think this Swedish Husar regiment was trained an uniformed after Hungarian pattern. Hungarin Husars became verry popular in europe in the late 17th century. But they have nothing in common with polish Hussars. As far I know the Hussaria turned during the 18 century to Uhlans (still fighting with lances but no bodyarmot) and was still used in WW2.
    Ulan is polish cavalery of 19 and begining of 20 century... and lance was used only as a parade weapon and maybe occasionally during polish - soviet war in 1920 at the time of WW2 Ulans were mouted infantry armed with short version of K98 Maauser, 35mm Bofors AT guns, and HMG, they used lances only on parades and even sabers were decommisioned in 1938 AFAIR, but most of them still weared them as a symbol of status since Ulans had a very good reputation and social status and can be treated as an elite units... They used horses only for transpotation and fighted dismounted and in whole 1939 war there is only one known exampe when they charged while being on horses.
    here are some photos of "Ułan" gear..


    may be loading crapy but should load.







  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Polska, Warszawa
    Posts
    97

    Default

    They used horses only for transpotation and fighted dismounted and in whole 1939 war there is only one known exampe when they charged while being on horses.
    Wow - I also thought that there was only one charge at Wólka Węglowa - known thanks to relation of italian war correspondent Mario Appelius but it seems that there was more charges (sorry only in polish):

    http://www.kawaleria2rp.horsesport.pl/szarze.htm

    The best is that most of them were successful due to the element of surprise and speed and ofcourse no-one was charging tanks - charges on tanks were invention of stupid propaganda.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •