Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: Battlefield Fashion

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Canada via Scotland
    Age
    52
    Posts
    232

    Default

    This should give you enough info about the hackle. The squaddies pictured are members of the Black Watch

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hackle

    And if you want to read up on the history of this Regiment (Now 3rd Btn Royal Regiment of Scotland or 3 Scots)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Watch

  2. #17
    Banned user
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Age
    46
    Posts
    24,868

    Default Tradition

    The core of the British Army is in its regimental system. Many regiments date back several centuries and each regiment adopts particular traditions and unique uniform items including the hackle as shown in the photo.

    Due to its limited size and power projection, the Brits have traditionally had taken a "community policing" approach to military deployments worldwide. This includes not appearing "too military" with the locals.

    After 30 years in Northern Ireland, one would think they would be more proficient in dealing with the locals.

  3. #18
    Senior Member Flavius22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,445

    Default

    chic passes out on live tv while reading broadcast

    http://www.nothingtoxic.com/media/11..._while_Talking

  4. #19
    Senior Member Ryan-John's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Baxter, TN
    Age
    22
    Posts
    1,052

    Default

    Well, look at his face! "Take a shot!, I DARE yuh!!!"

  5. #20
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,888

    Default

    easy target
    even chuck noris wont help here

  6. #21
    Classless Tard. BadKarma26's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Dry Land
    Posts
    6,156

    Default

    I understand how the Brits might have come to that conclusion but personally I don't see how a foreign soldier with an M249 and a feather in his cap would put me more at ease than with a helmet. To me the whole idea is fundamentally flawed. I wouldn't let my guys switch to softcaps in a combat zone period; **** the civilians "being at ease."

  7. #22
    Senior Member Count Lippe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Fürstentum Lippe
    Posts
    2,747

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nick_ua
    easy target
    even chuck noris wont help here
    Look at the picture again... Do they really want to be unseeen in a situation like that?

  8. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BadKarma26
    I understand how the Brits might have come to that conclusion but personally I don't see how a foreign soldier with an M249 and a feather in his cap would put me more at ease than with a helmet. To me the whole idea is fundamentally flawed. I wouldn't let my guys switch to softcaps in a combat zone period; **** the civilians "being at ease."
    Then your security precautions get in the way of your mission. It seems silly, but appearing less like a soldier in a war and more like a representative or policeman is very important, even if it endangers the soldiers.
    Of course you can't do this in zones where engagements still are frequent, but for Afghanistan or Kosovo this is appropiate in most cases.
    Ultimately, you want to bring the country back to "normal", and the civilians have to feel at ease for that. So the soldiers sort of lead by example, showing their confidence that the area is safer than before (when they were wearing helmets), kind of signaling their success to the population.

    In a Fallujah like situation or in hotspots around Baghdad this would be inappropiate, of course.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •