Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 71

Thread: Ralph Peters: Kill Terrorists, Do not Capture Them

  1. #31
    Faux Phallus Smuggler
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    6,288

    Default

    FINALLY !!
    THE BLUNT TRUTH !!!

    the bad guys know about geneva convention, and find and use loop-holes, while those loop-holes have'nt been patched up. Send 'em to allah i say !

  2. #32
    Banned user Paracaidista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    pissing the brass above Cascadia
    Posts
    1,004

    Default

    Would they rub the bullets with pig fat before?

    I heard some grease on helps preventing jams .

  3. #33
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    16

    Default

    lol, sorry guys, I have a problem where I mix up my thoughts, I meant ship em to antartica, not australia, I like aussies to much to do that to their country ;D

  4. #34
    phwoah titget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    small town where people poop on themselves a lot.
    Posts
    8,184

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Laworkerbee
    I've been saying this for a while, terrorists in prison only cause their comrades to raid schools and hospitals to free their comrades.

    Capture them, hold them in secret for interrogation, and kill them.

    We have much to learn from the French IMHO

    Thanks for the post Durandal
    yes....I like the way you think Laworkerbee

  5. #35
    No Good Bloody Seppo California Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Watching
    Age
    50
    Posts
    38,696

    Default

    I honestly wish Tane was here to comment on this. And like Royal said, he and the rest of us are not Judge Dredd. At what point during a firefight/surrender is it OK to be like the rumored Lt. Spears and give them a cigarette and then pull the trigger on your Thompson.....Seriously, we are indoctrinated nearly from birth that murder is wrong. That doesn't chang because you are a soldier. In a war that line becomes blurred. Better to kill them now than fight them later. Right? How do you figure out when to shoot a guy with his hands in the air, even if you seriously, and I mean seriously, think he needs killing. What does that do to you as a human being? Do you become the kind of guy that rationalizes everything because you can't live with the fact that you shot a bunch of combatants that had surrendered because you felt they were too dangerous to be left alive...

  6. #36
    ANZAC Moderator Ngati Tumatauenga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Sitting at my desk, writing my memoirs.
    Posts
    6,033

    Default

    Well, I used to have some measure of respect for Mr Peters. I've read most of his novels and a good many of his articles.

    Now I think he's just another fuckin media idiot mouthpiece irrespective of his prior service.

    So, the prevailing attitude amongst many on this site seems to agree with Mr Peters. Terrorists/insurgents should be executed out of hand, on the spot, wherever and whenever they are found.

    Why? Apparently because they do it to 'us', therefore that means we should do it to 'them'.

    Wow, incredibly detailed deductive reasoning at work there...

    I am a professional soldier. I have been for sixteen years. I have spent all of that time in what we refer to as 'teeth arm corps'. They're the guys who actually pull the trigger, etc, as opposed from those who sit behind desks collecting medals for promotional purposes.

    I have never believed that it is acceptable to stoop to the standards of those I have fought when their behaviour has not adhered to the Laws of Armed Conflict and I've fought some real shitbags in my time.

    I have never met another professional soldier from any country who disagreed with me.

    To many on this site and a few on this thread that will no doubt come as quite a shock.

    Why would someone who willingly and continuously puts themselves in harms way not use every means possible to wage war against his opponent?

    Why wouldn't he 'fight fire with fire'?

    Why indeed.

    Is he weak?

    Is he soft?

    Is he 'mentally wrecked'?

    Is he indeed.



    The fact is I know I'm better than the men and women I stand against. I am morally superior and personally, I always will be.

    Nobody is going to take that away from me. Even if in the future the laws are changed to make acting like the terrorists we fight legal. I still won't do it.

    Our society and respective cultures teach us to act better than that. That is why we will eventually prevail. Not because we became what we most despised.


    But apparently some of you think otherwise,

    bridget
    Laworkerbee
    deagle


    Maybe you'd like to enlighten us as to exactly how YOU would do it? Bullet to the back of the neck? Or do you consider that too humane? Maybe a blunt, rusty knife to the throat?

    C'mon tough c***s, tell us how you would do it. Or aren't you prepared to cover your hands in blood?

    Why don't you give up those nice comfortable day jobs and get out there with the rest of us, show us how its done?


    HOLLiS

    You're pathetic old man. You just don't have a fucken clue do you?

    Did you execute prisoners in South Vietnam during your tour? If its okay to do it now it must have been acceptable then.

    Stupid old fool, get back on the medication before you lose it completely.




    No matter how much I despise terrorists, and I really do, at least they have the guts to do what they believe and for that I will respect them.

    You cowardly shitbags however disgust me. Not only do you preach the same abhorent drivel as terrorists, you wouldn't have the courage, such as it is, to do the deed yourselves.

    Fucken pathetic.

  7. #37
    Loadmaster General Laworkerbee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    California Über Alles
    Age
    43
    Posts
    40,347

    Default

    Ngati Tumatuenga

    whilst I consider your post harsh I do consider it a good reality check, I like the style in which CJ posed the question more.

    But to answer simply after digesting everything Firetxmi posed to me, I can say no I would not want our men and women serving overseas put in a position where they are judge, jury, and executioner and have murder on their conscience.

  8. #38
    Senior Member Firetxmi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    KANJ/KDFW
    Posts
    2,461

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Laworkerbee

    But to answer simply after digesting everything Firetxmi posed to me, I can say no I would not want our men and women serving overseas put in a position where they are judge, jury, and executioner and have murder on their conscience.
    Good to hear!

  9. #39
    ANZAC Moderator Ngati Tumatauenga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Sitting at my desk, writing my memoirs.
    Posts
    6,033

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Laworkerbee
    Ngati Tumatuenga

    whilst I consider your post harsh
    That's good. It was intended to be harsh in line with the subject matter.

    Quote Originally Posted by Laworkerbee
    I do consider it a good reality check,
    That's even better.

    Quote Originally Posted by Laworkerbee
    I like the style in which CJ posed the question more.
    Most people would prefer an attitude adjustment from CJ rather from me I would imagine. Of course if you don't say anything I consider stupid then you won't have to feel my wrath.

    If that reads as arrogance, I could care less. If you were standing in my shoes you would feel EXACTLY the same.

  10. #40
    Avoiding Asshats, Lying Low DeltaWhisky58's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Feeling The Hate®
    Posts
    14,634

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ngati Tumatuenga
    Well, I used to have some measure of respect for Mr Peters. I've read most of his novels and a good many of his articles.

    Now I think he's just another fuckin media idiot mouthpiece irrespective of his prior service.

    So, the prevailing attitude amongst many on this site seems to agree with Mr Peters. Terrorists/insurgents should be executed out of hand, on the spot, wherever and whenever they are found.

    Why? Apparently because they do it to 'us', therefore that means we should do it to 'them'.

    Wow, incredibly detailed deductive reasoning at work there...

    I am a professional soldier. I have been for sixteen years. I have spent all of that time in what we refer to as 'teeth arm corps'. They're the guys who actually pull the trigger, etc, as opposed from those who sit behind desks collecting medals for promotional purposes.

    I have never believed that it is acceptable to stoop to the standards of those I have fought when their behaviour has not adhered to the Laws of Armed Conflict and I've fought some real shitbags in my time.

    I have never met another professional soldier from any country who disagreed with me.

    To many on this site and a few on this thread that will no doubt come as quite a shock.

    Why would someone who willingly and continuously puts themselves in harms way not use every means possible to wage war against his opponent?

    Why wouldn't he 'fight fire with fire'?

    Why indeed.

    Is he weak?

    Is he soft?

    Is he 'mentally wrecked'?

    Is he indeed.



    The fact is I know I'm better than the men and women I stand against. I am morally superior and personally, I always will be.

    Nobody is going to take that away from me. Even if in the future the laws are changed to make acting like the terrorists we fight legal. I still won't do it.

    Our society and respective cultures teach us to act better than that. That is why we will eventually prevail. Not because we became what we most despised.


    But apparently some of you think otherwise,

    bridget
    Laworkerbee
    deagle

    Maybe you'd like to enlighten us as to exactly how YOU would do it? Bullet to the back of the neck? Or do you consider that too humane? Maybe a blunt, rusty knife to the throat?

    C'mon tough c***s, tell us how you would do it. Or aren't you prepared to cover your hands in blood?

    Why don't you give up those nice comfortable day jobs and get out there with the rest of us, show us how its done?


    HOLLiS

    You're pathetic old man. You just don't have a fucken clue do you?

    Did you execute prisoners in South Vietnam during your tour? If its okay to do it now it must have been acceptable then.

    Stupid old fool, get back on the medication before you lose it completely.




    No matter how much I despise terrorists, and I really do, at least they have the guts to do what they believe and for that I will respect them.

    You cowardly shitbags however disgust me. Not only do you preach the same abhorent drivel as terrorists, you wouldn't have the courage, such as it is, to do the deed yourselves.

    Fucken pathetic.
    Reasoned, sensible and to the point after reading so much of the rubbish posted by our armchair warriors.

    To a large majority of our membership ... ... ... Take note of what this guy says before spitting any more venom from your comforatable homes - this guy has been there and done it, have you? I for one have not and can only imagine what the front line is like. Remember what guys like Ngati have to say.

    Take a reality check guys - wise up!

    I salute you Sir!

  11. #41
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Israel
    Age
    34
    Posts
    95

    Default

    I don't think a terrorist/ illegal combatant should be given in any chance to surrender in an actual firefight, and that's why every chance to verify a kill should be taken. However, if he has manged to surrender, or in cases where they are caught unarmed in an non-combat situation, we can not stoop to field executions.

    No matter how much I despise terrorists, and I really do, at least they have the guts to do what they believe and for that I will respect them.
    You respect their "guts" to purposely kill civilians... good job

  12. #42
    Hot Biker Dude of Death Royal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    'round and about...
    Posts
    7,958

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tamir
    I don't think a terrorist/ illegal combatant should be given in any chance to surrender in an actual firefight, and that's why every chance to verify a kill should be taken.
    It's a good job that we don't have to fight alongside you, but just defend your right to spout murderous drivel in the internet instead then isn't it?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tamir
    However, if he has manged to surrender, or in cases where they are caught unarmed in an non-combat situation, we can not stoop to field executions.
    How very big of you to pay at least that lip service to the laws of war. Thank you so much.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tamir
    You respect their "guts" to purposely kill civilians... good job
    No ****head - he respects their "guts" to get off their arrses and fight for what they believe in rather than playing armchair commando.

  13. #43
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Israel
    Age
    34
    Posts
    95

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Royal
    It's a good job that we don't have to fight alongside you, but just defend your right to spout murderous drivel in the internet instead then isn't it?



    How very big of you to pay at least that lip service to the laws of war. Thank you so much.



    No ****head - he respects their "guts" to get off their arrses and fight for what they believe in rather than playing armchair commando.
    Ilegal combatant are not defended by the rules of war.
    I don't have an armchair.
    It doesn't take guts to go kill civilians, anyone who thinks like that ...

    ps. Sure is nice that mods are allowed to curse people on this board, but if it's vice-versa they just ban them.

  14. #44
    Hot Biker Dude of Death Royal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    'round and about...
    Posts
    7,958

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tamir
    Ilegal combatant are not defended by the rules of war..
    'Illegal combatant' is not a term even recognised by the LOAC's.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tamir
    I don't have an armchair.
    That I find very hard to believe.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tamir
    It doesn't take guts to go kill civilians, anyone who thinks like that ...
    It takes either psycopathy or guts to kill anyone.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tamir
    ps. nice a mods are allowed to curse people on this board, but if it's vice-versa they just ban them.
    C'est la vie...

  15. #45
    Moderator & Go Go Dancer Of Death Chops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Omar's Tittie Taverna & Grill, Deh Rawod
    Posts
    2,846

    Default

    Ngati- one of the best posts I've ever read here. Accurate, articulate and with a little trademark bite- well done sir.

    Tamir- shut your hole

    C

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •