+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Golan Wheeled Armored Vehicle

  1. #1
    Senior Member GiladS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    A small country that makes a lot of noise
    Age
    21
    Posts
    4,719

    Golan Wheeled Armored Vehicle

    Golan Wheeled Armored Vehicle




    Golan, a new wheeled armored vehicle developed in Israel by RAFAEL was unveiled today (Sept 27, 2006). Responding to the need for wheeled armored vehicles for use in asymmetric warfare, RAFAEL developed the Zeev (Wolf) armored utility vehicle. More recently, RAFAEL teamed with US based PVI and the Merkava program Office (Mantak), to develop the Golan Heavy Wheeled Armored vehicle. Golan has been proposed for the IDF and USMC. Testing of the vehicle began in September 2006

    The 15 ton vehicle is designed to carry 10 fully equipped troops, providing effective protection from small arms, mines and IEDs, as well as RPG threats.
    The vehicle uses an armored monocoque structure. The integrity of this structure provides the strength to absorb the deformations generated by mines and IED blasts. The hull uses a V shaped formation and a "floating floor" panel to mitigate the blast effects of mines. It thereby provides an optimal solution to protect the crew and vehicle against the identified threats. The spall liner was eliminated, assuming the efficiency of external armor to prevent hull penetration by most threats. Unlike vehicles utilizing off-the-shelf commercial chassis, the Golan does not have a chassis at all. Instead, the 4x4 automotive system axles, and suspensions link directly to the armored structure, which acts as a frame. This approach is similar to that used with tracked APCs and tanks. It retains good off-road mobility, and is particularly suitable for operations in dense urban terrain.

    This approach enables the designers to dedicate 50% of the vehicle's weight to protection, providing effective protection from IEDs, land mines and small arms. The vehicle will be produced in three protection levels. The intermediate level provides protection from small arms, up to 14.5 mm AP and 20mm, and effective roof protection.

    The passive armor utilizes a combination of protection technologies including metals, composites, slat and transparent armor. The maximum protection level includes reactive modular armor tiles while the medium and light levels are based on passive modular armor. Protection from anti-tank rockets (Such as RPGs) can be provided by appliqué reactive armor modules or an active protection system which are "plug-in" add-ons to the basic design. The add-on reactive armor system utilizes the Insensitive

    Explosive Reactive Armor (I-ERA) tiles installed on the side walls. The I-ERA is based on the same technology provided for the US Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle. The reactive (I-ERA) add-on armor is an insensitive explosive known as Low Burn Rate (LBR) or Low Flammability (LF2) that was approved by both the Israeli Defense Force and the US Army.

    The vehicle can be equipped with remotely controlled weapon station mounting a machine gun, and optronic equipment, as well as the gunshot detection system.

    Link

  2. #2
    Member unpredictable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    portugal
    Posts
    278

    Bib animal that is!!!

  3. #3
    Senior Member ZaakM433's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    PSU Kansas
    Posts
    3,029

    Reactive armor on a utility vehicle?

    Has there been some sort of paradigm shift regarding the use of dismounted infantry?

  4. #4
    Combat boots fetish gilgoul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Loquendi Libertatem Custodiamus
    Posts
    3,034

    Quote Originally Posted by ZaakM433 View Post
    Reactive armor on a utility vehicle?

    Has there been some sort of paradigm shift regarding the use of dismounted infantry?
    No, the idea is simply to get the dismounted infantry where it has to go.
    Plus, considering the number of patrol missions that are carrying full squads 'in case of" you ought to give them the best compromise between maneuvre, especially in urban terrain, and protection.
    engineers aren't departing from the idea of the IFV keeping with MBT's, see the namer IFV. This product responds to a different need, a vehicle able to move around in the casbah, thing that a M113 or a stryker don't seem able to do.

  5. #5
    Combat boots fetish gilgoul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Loquendi Libertatem Custodiamus
    Posts
    3,034

    Quote Originally Posted by GiladS View Post
    Golan Wheeled Armored Vehicle




    Golan, a new wheeled armored vehicle developed in Israel by RAFAEL was unveiled today (Sept 27, 2006). Responding to the need for wheeled armored vehicles for use in asymmetric warfare, RAFAEL developed the Zeev (Wolf) armored utility vehicle. More recently, RAFAEL teamed with US based PVI and the Merkava program Office (Mantak), to develop the Golan Heavy Wheeled Armored vehicle. Golan has been proposed for the IDF and USMC. Testing of the vehicle began in September 2006

    The 15 ton vehicle is designed to carry 10 fully equipped troops, providing effective protection from small arms, mines and IEDs, as well as RPG threats.
    The vehicle uses an armored monocoque structure. The integrity of this structure provides the strength to absorb the deformations generated by mines and IED blasts. The hull uses a V shaped formation and a "floating floor" panel to mitigate the blast effects of mines. It thereby provides an optimal solution to protect the crew and vehicle against the identified threats. The spall liner was eliminated, assuming the efficiency of external armor to prevent hull penetration by most threats. Unlike vehicles utilizing off-the-shelf commercial chassis, the Golan does not have a chassis at all. Instead, the 4x4 automotive system axles, and suspensions link directly to the armored structure, which acts as a frame. This approach is similar to that used with tracked APCs and tanks. It retains good off-road mobility, and is particularly suitable for operations in dense urban terrain.

    This approach enables the designers to dedicate 50% of the vehicle's weight to protection, providing effective protection from IEDs, land mines and small arms. The vehicle will be produced in three protection levels. The intermediate level provides protection from small arms, up to 14.5 mm AP and 20mm, and effective roof protection.

    The passive armor utilizes a combination of protection technologies including metals, composites, slat and transparent armor. The maximum protection level includes reactive modular armor tiles while the medium and light levels are based on passive modular armor. Protection from anti-tank rockets (Such as RPGs) can be provided by appliqué reactive armor modules or an active protection system which are "plug-in" add-ons to the basic design. The add-on reactive armor system utilizes the Insensitive

    Explosive Reactive Armor (I-ERA) tiles installed on the side walls. The I-ERA is based on the same technology provided for the US Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle. The reactive (I-ERA) add-on armor is an insensitive explosive known as Low Burn Rate (LBR) or Low Flammability (LF2) that was approved by both the Israeli Defense Force and the US Army.

    The vehicle can be equipped with remotely controlled weapon station mounting a machine gun, and optronic equipment, as well as the gunshot detection system.

    Link


    Where's the roof armour?
    I don't wanna be a party pooper, but the roof seems to be pretty thin, and if this vehicle is supposed to operate in urban setting, I'd like to see some serious roof protection. ask the users of armoured sufa what they think about it.

  6. #6
    Diagnosis: chronic mpnetoholism (F99.9) Switek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Greater Poland (Potatoland)
    Age
    40
    Posts
    10,605

    looks like Polish Dzik but with better design... Nice

  7. #7
    Senior Member saigonsmuggler's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    2,107

    Quote Originally Posted by ZaakM433 View Post
    Reactive armor on a utility vehicle?

    Has there been some sort of paradigm shift regarding the use of dismounted infantry?
    these Israeli-made ERA is safe for dismounts, if that's what you are asking. They contain the brick's explosion very well.

  8. #8
    Senior Member alexz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,889

    Anyone know IF German Dingos sales to Israel is on track again
    or are they affrais it will be used against terrorists again?

  9. #9
    Senior Member Ren987's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    France
    Age
    25
    Posts
    1,586

    Finally, isn't it a good thing that Germany refused to sell the Dingo to Israel? (first refused then changed its mind but dragged its feet...)

    Israel always comes up with an alternative solution :

    Golan (weighting 15t; 315 HP; capable of carrying up to 10 troops; rear ramp+4 roof hatches; armor accounting for 50% of the weight)
    More info at http://www.rafael.co.il/marketing/SI...ILES/5/855.pdf


    Dingo II (11.9t; 218 HP; 2+6 troops capable; 4 lateral doors+1 hatch)
    http://www.doppeladler.com/oebh/dingo.htm (in german)
    Last edited by Ren987; 02-20-2007 at 09:01 PM.

  10. #10
    Member IsraDani's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    in a shavit rocket,hovering and supercruising at the same time
    Posts
    919

    Yes, the roof seems definitely too *thin* considered what they usually throw from the above but in the other parts it looks strong and mobile enough for facing the urban warfare.
    Nice one.

  11. #11

    needs gunship support to pop rooftop shooters with RPGs in urban ops

  12. #12
    Senior Member Ren987's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    France
    Age
    25
    Posts
    1,586

    Quote Originally Posted by IsraDani View Post
    Yes, the roof seems definitely too *thin* considered what they usually throw from the above but in the other parts it looks strong and mobile enough for facing the urban warfare.
    Nice one.
    Nothing better than good old sandbags


  13. #13
    Member IsraDani's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    in a shavit rocket,hovering and supercruising at the same time
    Posts
    919

    Quote Originally Posted by Ren987 View Post
    Nothing better than good old sandbags
    We putted almost everything on that poor m-113s.
    Nice memories..

  14. #14
    Senior Member INAT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Overtly covert and covertly overt.
    Posts
    4,770

    Thats a beauty.What is it's primary role? general APC?

  15. #15
    Member IDF-Godzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    729

    The question is will this vehicle be bought in it's mass's?
    Is it still in it's testing stage?

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts