No no, you shoot him in the leg. Bad guys ALWAYS stay down when you shoot 'em in the leg.
No no, you shoot him in the leg. Bad guys ALWAYS stay down when you shoot 'em in the leg.
No, you're supposed to shoot them in the shoulder.
Compromise. You throw your knife at his shoulder, then karate kick his leg.
Summa sumarum:
Shooting a target 18-27 times is better and more pro than shooting a target 68 times, or 1 officer shoots the target 2 times, max 3, while the other 8 officers cheers about the SWATs ability to remain cool.
According to Dolph "sniffit" Lundgren.
The end.
maybe someone should check rotten.com or ******.com...
edit: lol, a modbot stood by to edit my post
hrm firing 110 rounds on a suspect doesnt look very professional to me, and their statement they only tried not to let him shoot back is ridiculous. i mean, a simple had shot wasnt enough, was it? well i can understand their behaviour but what these swat officers did was the old "dont mess up with the police" - thing. we had something similar here...after a bank robbery a armed suspect used a motorcycle to escape and as he did that he drove over an officer. then they hit him 14-times.
ok so what difference does it make if the offciers fired 12 rounds each or 3?
same end result, the guy would be dead anyway.
i really do not understand what people's problem is with the number of rounds fired in this situation.
no - of course its better to unload your magazines on that bastard then throw some frags to make sure he didnt survive the 68 bullets - then drive a wooden stake through his heart (or whats left of it) and shoot a silver bullet through his head, cover the dead body with garlic and holy water - then burn the remains.
EDIT: @Aerosoul: because police is supposed to act rational - not emotional.
if they shoot more then nessecary on purpose (i say if because we dont know if they did or didnt -but imo it looks that way) just because it was so much fun shooting the guy to **** its not right
Humm, and if he comes back, we are all in a world of Sh1t!!!! Maybe a B52 strike, when it is all done, we can do urban development project there.
10 officers at 11 rounds each = 110 rds.. I think Killing him dead was a excellent choice.
0r 20 officers at 5.5 rounds each = 110 rd.
I guess we could argue the merits of the 0.5 rounds, how that was done, or even if it was done....... but at the end of this thread and all the jabbering about 110 rounds, the sucker is still dead.
Chuck Norris would protect us from the undead.
I can drop 4 badguys (Mr.Potatohead figure) with bursted headshots with my ironsighted Marui MP5 @5m with 12 rounds. Surely SWAT could match my leetness IRL./JK
Edit: Added /JK in desperation as not to be labeled as an airsofter....i do have a Buccaneer´s outfit though, but thats for the bedroom.
Last edited by Superking; 10-02-2006 at 05:19 AM.
death from natural causes
killing a cop and the deciding to shoot it out with swat