OK again![]()
casseles ~6.5mm with power of charge simmiliar to ~5.56
5.56 mm NATO
5.45 mm
7.62 mm x 39
7.62 mm x 51
6.8 mm
other
Other (imaginary)
There are too many variables to accuratly pic one
This is the stupidest poll ever.
This is the worst topic ever. If only it will die with this thread.
Thoughts?
OK again![]()
casseles ~6.5mm with power of charge simmiliar to ~5.56
Originally Posted by [url=http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/viewtopic.php?p=223170#223170
Not to nitpick, but as REMOV would say; 'Some of those calibers are battle rifle calibers'... :P
REMOV is old nitpicker so no need to worryOriginally Posted by Haiw
![]()
4.73mm x 33 Caseless
I think its to little for asault, but for pdw type guns and rear its enoughOriginally Posted by HELEX
Im talking about this:
http://www.hkpro.com/video/g11-1-128.mpg
![]()
I know, IMHO that gun with this ammo still hasn't enough power/range for large part of the job...
That's why they gave it the superquick superduper überburst.Originally Posted by Herrmannek
![]()
Muzzle velocity is at 930 m/sec... thats 200m/sec more than the MP7 and the Bullet weight is also doubled.
Yes and NoOriginally Posted by Haiw
Round was designed for far smaller ranges than normal soldiers happens to engage targets(iraq,a-stan), maybe if that gun could be coupled with HE 25mm like in OICW, more power wouldn't be necesairly necessary...
Mayby first on the left - British .280 (7x43mm)...but I think that NATO will keep 5.56x45 ( mayby with plastic shell ), and only for some missions soldiers will be equip with diffrent ammo for example with 6.8x43...
7.5x54mm Swiss, 'cause it looks cool.![]()
.45-70? Too old school? Sorry...![]()