Reply With QuoteThank u so much i was searching for this videosOriginally Posted by Wazzaap
u r welcome
Thank u so much i was searching for this videos
Finaly,western-style tracks!Thx for the great pics!!
^ thats T90 U?
If I'm not mistaken, it's the T-80UM1 "Bars".
thx for confirmation
I found this magazine...looks interesting..nice reading and nice weekend evrybody
Link:
http://rapidshare.com/files/94052525/bk5.zip
And some photos ...
Sorry for Russian...S nastupaiushim Dnom Zaschitnika Otechistva !!!
...
..
.
54512345678
excellent post. good use of space. just like my post.
Yes and no. First of all you need to look at what was done. A specially modified SM-3 missile was used to shoot down a satellite that was in a deteriorating orbit. They used the sensors designed for their ABM system to plot the flightpath of the target and they placed half a dozen ships with modified SM-3s on them in an area the target was expected to pass over. Using target data from the sensors they fired one missile and hit the target but the missile launch platform would have been chosen at the last minute from the available ships to get the best chance of hitting the target. It is not the sort of thing that is easily repeatable in, say wartime. Giving the Russian navy the same capability would be rather pointless... personally I don't understand why they didn't just send the space shuttle up with some HE and blow it up in space that way. Of course this was a secret spy satellite and it pretty much had to be smashed into smitherenes to prevent bits falling into the wrong hands. (The crap about the danger to the public is just rubbish... it was a 3 ton satellite that was the size of a bus because the big solar panels made it look that big. On reentry it would be the size of a small car with no heat protection at all... we all saw what tragically happened to the shuttle that lost a few heat tiles during reentry and it really was bigger than a bus and weighed in at just over 100 tons yet there was little threat to the public. Sure there was no fuel on board but as the satellite entered our atmosphere the instant the fuel tank ruptured the fuel would have vapourised like human blood would in the extreme low air pressure of near space.Somebody knows, whether there is in Russia a missile having similar characteristics?
The S-300V series probably could be modified in the same way the SM_3 was modified for the job but the Russians still have an operational ABM system around Moscow that could certainly do the job too, with missiles able to operate outside the atmosphere... though the 1 MT warheads might be moreThere is no naval missile in russian inventory which reach characteristics of recent blocks of SM-2 and SM-3. However the larger missile of the two employed on land-based S-300V has the same mission and rather comparable characteristics to SM-3.
disagreeable.
The main issue is that the SM-3 is a relatively new missile and was designed after the end of the ABM treaty.
The S-500 in development now will likely combine an ability to intercept everything from cruise missiles to space based objects.
BTW nice pictures, movies and books being posted here... much appreciated... thanks.
Also I think it is possible the Russian AF might stop calling the new Flanker Su-27BM and start calling it Su-35 when it actually enters service. The Russian Navy did rename the Su-27K as the Su-33 and the AF renamed the Su-27IB as the Su-34 when they entered service.
BTW Apology's for my ignorance but what does it mean when you just post numbers like this:
54512345678
I see it a lot and really don't have any idea what it means.
Try deleting your post, you will see...
Continuing...
...
..
.
Some projekts...hope that we will see some of them in the service in Russian Army in near future
T-4
LFI
No idea..
M-200
TU-135
Rubber-padded tracks with sequential pad connection are standard on all T-80 since 1978.
Posting Permissions
