Thread: Russian Photos (updated on regular basis)

  1. #25246
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    In the closet, hiding from adminz
    Age
    28
    Posts
    143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Herman the German View Post
    Most western tanks have a frontal armour (turret) of more than 120 cm. IIRC the Leo 2a5 and above has about 150cm of frontal armor.

    Edit:
    MZKT was a bit faster...
    Its silly to say "this weapon will always defeat (or never) defeat that armor." In combat conditions, things are unpredictable. A hit might not totally penetrate into the fighting compartment but might shatter the ceramic/composite sandwich armor, therefore degrading its RHA rating, vehicle might have defects etc.

    Comparing Kornet to Spire or Javelin is comparing apples and oranges. The Kornet is a low engagement cost laser beam rider while the other two are high engagement cost IR imager guided. Poland/Spain only ordered +-250 launchers and around 2500 missiles, which doesn't seem significant in the big picture.

    Kornet is powerfu, because of its 150mm/7kg warhead which is comparable to TOW and aproaching that of the Hellfire (178mm/10kg.) I'm sure no tank crew would want to get shot at with one of these.

    As for the RPG-29, I doubt it has any better penetration than western systems like Panzerfaust 3 etc, the rockets just fly faster so you have a better chance of hitting. These reloadable systems are heavy though, thats why most armies are going with disposable, one shot weapons.

  2. #25247
    Senior Member Jippo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,695

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gosciu555 View Post
    Its silly to say "this weapon will always defeat (or never) defeat that armor." In combat conditions, things are unpredictable.
    Agreed Finnish T-72M1 test turret was penetrated from the front by 30mm from BMP-2. One round hit a cable duct near gunner sight and went through.

  3. #25248
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    City on a hill
    Posts
    315

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zmey View Post
    If one is to believe wiki, then Akula is 175 meters long while Borei is 170 meters.
    But nevertheless Akula compare to Borei looks much higher above water.

  4. #25249
    Member _GDS_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Lithuania, Vilnius
    Age
    26
    Posts
    586

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by enallos View Post
    Some nice images from airliners.net


    This photo here just has to have a motivator.

    The real face of Ka-52 is Mi-26 chopper

  5. #25250
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,629

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shoora View Post
    But nevertheless Akula compare to Borei looks much higher above water.
    Akula are always much higher above water. Their floatability reserve is unmatched among submarines. However both submarines on the photo are without missiles.

  6. #25251
    Senior Member JohnnyWalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fo shizzle
    Posts
    3,941

    Default

    Hey Vitaliy. Where are all of your photos of different Special Ops? I cannot find them on your blog. I looked to page 15. I saw Saturn, but that's it. Where did they all go?

  7. #25252
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by enallos View Post
    Some nice images from airliners.net


    Su-47 is so damn sexy.

    Also, the black paint/camo is a pure win.

  8. #25253
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,541

    Default

    Good video of exercises of the NCMD:

    http://www.volgograd-trv.ru/video.aspx?id=7988

    Of interest is the presence of T-90s and BMP-3s. Does anybody know how prevalent the TOS-1 Buratino is in Russian units? I always thought it was a relatively specialised machine, but lately I've seen it almost in every video of army exercises (this one included)

  9. #25254

    Default

    Lots of great pictures! I cant help it but many of them really reminds me of S.T.A.L.K.E.R shadow of Chernobyl!

  10. #25255
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Russia, Vladivostok
    Posts
    20

    Default

    http://perevodika.ru/articles/6119.html
    coloured photos soviet soldiers WWII

  11. #25256

    Default

    Killer robotz (in Russian) http://lenta.ru/news/2009/10/28/robot/

    at last

  12. #25257
    Member RomanP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Age
    28
    Posts
    128

    Default
































  13. #25258

    Default

    why is by many russaian tanks,, the fuel-tank outside at the rear and not inside, i mean every one can use the fueltank as a target.


  14. #25259
    Member Antibiotik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    From heart of Mordor
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by adr1an0 View Post
    why is by many russaian tanks,, the fuel-tank outside at the rear and not inside, i mean every one can use the fueltank as a target.

    These are additional tanks, for a march))) the basic tanks inside

  15. #25260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nsp View Post
    Killer robotz (in Russian) http://lenta.ru/news/2009/10/28/robot/
    Video
    http://www.rian.ru/video/20091028/190955829.html
    (in Russian)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •