Reply With Quote
Btw. Probably SanBat ( Mediacal Battalion) exercises for non-combat personel
hello
it`s old and ugly flying tank
the A 10 is more better
the russian army needs a new close ground support fighter
http://smitsmitty.livejournal.com/92316.html[/QUOTE]
Btw. Probably SanBat ( Mediacal Battalion) exercises for non-combat personel
It's as old as A-10 and again, it's as ugly as A-10 is. As for A-10 being better, watch that last video I posted. It's faster and more maneuverable, survivable as A-10, and while sporting a double barreled cannon, it's rate of fire is in smack dab middle between the GAU-8's low and high rates of fire.Originally Posted by attackboy
I think we have another account of this troll.
Btw. Probably SanBat ( Mediacal Battalion) exercises for non-combat personel
Yep its exercises for Medical Battalion, Signals Battalion and Staff from Battalion HQ.
So is the A-10 and it doesn't have to be pretty, it has to be able take a beating and return home, which it has:
The A-10 fits the tactical doctrine of the United States, while the Su-25 fits the doctrine for the Federation. There is no better" aircraft just aircraft that fits the war-fighting prospective of their respective countries.the A 10 is more better
The SU-25 is doing a marvelous job and they are are being upgraded to SU-25SM configuration for improve survivability and combat effectiveness and they are expected to remain in service until early 2020s.the russian army needs a new close ground support fighter
Last edited by Hisroyalhighness; 05-31-2012 at 05:33 PM.
Photo report from 5th Anniversary International Exhibition Integrated Safety and Security Exhibition 2012 (ISSE-2012). From 22nd to 25th May in Moscow almost 454 companies from 18 countries demonstrated their achievements of the safety and security ensuring at ISSE-2012 exhibition.
Full part 1: http://vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/451
Ural-63099 armored vehicle
2250x1500
2250x1500
2250x1500
2250x1500
2250x1500
2250x1500
Acmat ALTV SC
2250x1500
Acmat VLRA TDE 4.36 CCF-L
2250x1500
Emergency vehicle MAVR-588560S "White eagle-2"
2250x1500
Airfield fire fighting vehicle AA 12/60 on KAMAZ-63501 chassis
2250x1500
Emergency and fire fighting vehicles on IVECO AMT chassis
2250x1500
Emergency vehicle PSA-MM on MB Sprinter 515CDI chassis
2250x1500
Sapper protective suit Zaslon-PM-1S
2250x1500
Fire fighting tractor Onezhets-310
2250x1500
Mobile emergency complex Granit
2250x1500
Emergency UAV system designed by Tranzas company
2250x1500
Fire patrol vehicle LPA-3 on UAZ-31519 base
2250x1500
Fire fighting system Potok on KAMAZ-6520 chassis
2250x1500
2250x1500
Multifunctional fire fighting and emergency vehicle on BV-206 MLI base
2250x1500
SU 25 that is ..
as ugly as death itself.
I think it looks sweet.
that sweet thing can take out a tank battalion
that is right my friend
but in iraq , the real experiment of A 10, the iraqi tanks have been destroyed by close and far support of A-10
and the targets destroyed by 100/100 accuracy
the su 25 technology is too old ,there is no guided bombs , high rate of shooting down.
Yep its exercises for Medical Battalion, Signals Battalion and Staff from Battalion HQ.
So is the A-10 and it doesn't have to be pretty, it has to be able take a beating and return home, which it has:
The A-10 fits the tactical doctrine of the United States, while the Su-25 fits the doctrine for the Federation. There is no better" aircraft just aircraft that fits the war-fighting prospective of their respective countries.
The SU-25 is doing a marvelous job and they are are being upgraded to SU-25SM configuration for improve survivability and combat effectiveness and they are expected to remain in service until early 2020s.[/QUOTE]
I actually find A-10 beautiful. But it's no match to modernized SU-25.
Bullsh/t, that would mean every single AGM functioned 100% perfectly, Every single DUR from the GAU-8 hit its assigned target and not the opposing terrain and that all dumb munitions hit their targets exactly and were not affected by adverse conditions.
It's the same age as the A-10, try again.the su 25 technology is too old ,
Oh look, whats under it's wing? Looks like a KAB-500kr, guided munition.there is no guided bombs
Attrition rates are most prevalent for CAS aircraft since they are right there in the combat zone and are vulnerable to everything AAA, Manpads, Heavy Machine guns from the opposing ground troops.high rate of shooting down
Quit trolling.
SU 25 that is ..
as ugly as death itself.
Why is it military hardware has to be "pretty". What is it with everybody thinking everything has to be so pretty. It's war, not a fashion contest. It don't matter if it looks like a big dump of steel soddered together in a garage, or if it is a streamline aircraft with smooth lines and curves. The purpose of weapons is to kill. The Grebeshok does that very well. It has many many instance of return to airfield with shredded wings and tails, and with 1 engine.
Guys it's the same troll as usually!
Folks, just a heads up, but you are feeding the troll.
Posting Permissions
