
Originally Posted by
moosefoot
Why bother with such a bulky and complicated solution when there already are field tested active protection systems that do the job in a much more elegant fashion? Besides, as noted it doesn't show an independently rotating mount. Is the reason for this "tank-CIWS"-idea solely based on the fact that we are looking at a gatling barrel arrangement somewhat similar to Phalanx, AK-630 etc? Mind you, a huge ASM coming in over open sea is a little bit different from an ATGM or RPG fired at you from a few hundred yards over varying terrain.