Thread: Russian Photos (updated on regular basis)

  1. #16546
    Suspended account - user request
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Bize her yer Trabzon
    Posts
    4,494

    Default

    Does the shipborne Su 25 have folding wings?

  2. #16547

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Karaahmetoglu კოპაძე View Post
    Does the shipborne Su 25 have folding wings?
    Yes, it sure does (damn character limit).

  3. #16548
    Member K-5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Homosphere, bottom
    Age
    27
    Posts
    428

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Karaahmetoglu კოპაძე View Post
    Does the shipborne Su 25 have folding wings?
    Sure does

  4. #16549
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    5,470

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GROUND WAVE View Post
    I heard that it's hard for russia to get built is this true?
    Fantastic first post...

    Good morning

  5. #16550
    Federov Avtomat, FTW!
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    5,981

    Default

    tu160
    That top photo with the curtain between the two front seat in the dashboard is a Bear... or possibly a Tu-16. The curtain is so the navigator can climb into his nose position. The bottom pic with the fighter style control sticks is the Tu-160 before the upgrade.

    Specifications also indicate it could be a test bed for T-95 or may be its just my thought


    T-95 has no crew in turret so its turret is unlikely to be that big.

    What I ment in my earlier post was I heard it is hard for Russia to build AESA Radars on-par with the U.S. does anyone know if this is true?
    The problem for Russia is size of electronics. They are world leaders when it comes to designing radars. When tested after the end of the cold war their space tracking radars were found to be rather more capable than western equivelents. Note this is not new... when the U-2 Powers was flying was shot down many western experts believed U-2 spy planes were safe because Soviet radars were all based on US radars supplied during WWII. What they didn't know is that the soviets weren't working from scratch when they got US radars and had improved them greatly since they got them.
    An AESA radar is like an array grid of 1,000+ radars... that is transmit and receive modules. The Soviets were the first to deploy an operational PESA radar on an operational aircraft in the Mig-31 so they are not new to radar arrays. The problem is that AESA needs minaturisation which has always been a strong point of US electronics and not so important to the Soviets.
    PESA has many of the features of AESA but it also lacks some of the important ones too. Very large building sized radars, the Soviets/Russians can make AESA. Making them small enough to fit in the nose of a fighter aircraft is something they have only demonstrated in the last few years.

  6. #16551
    Federov Avtomat, FTW!
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    5,981

    Default

    Does the shipborne Su 25 have folding wings?
    Keep in mind that the naval Su-25 has had its gun and weapon system removed and uses its pylons for dummy AAMs and fuel tanks only. It is a trainer for naval pilots. With armour reduced and no weapon payload the Su-25 even in the two seat model is a zippy performer.

    BTW that Armed Assault II vid looks really good... going to have to upgrade my computer though... I noticed during the vid that some aircraft were armed with missiles with black and white stripes on them. That colouring signifies that the weapons are dummys for training.

  7. #16552
    Senior Member mannelig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    1,156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xav View Post
    Cold war secret project: T-4MS


    Other secret projects include:
    -Tu-360 (late 1980ies) with hydrogen engines and Mach 6 top speed, 15,000 Km range and 10 tons of weapons to strike deep inside continental US.
    Isn`t that tooooooooo tooo much?

  8. #16553
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,541

    Default

    Skip to 1:50 in the following video and check out the pretty cool ammo feed set up for the Pecheneg directly out of the backpack

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh2n_...c-HM-fresh+div

  9. #16554

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zmey View Post
    That is MIR space station crapper. This is Tu-160
    Not only is that a photo of the MIR Space Staion crapper - it is MY photo of the MIR Space Station crapper!!!

    It was taken in 2002 - when we visited Star City and went inside the MIR mockup.

    I posted it on my website - and it has since appeared on various Chinese websites - and pops up occasionally purporting to be the toilet from the Su-34 !!

    It is from the mockup of the MIR Space Station at Star City, Moscow.....

    Here is my original......

    Ken
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	MIR Toilet.jpg 
Views:	207 
Size:	538.0 KB 
ID:	71836  

  10. #16555

    Default

    Yak-38



    Harrier



    The question is....Soviets copied from RAF or the other way around??

  11. #16556

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by K-5 View Post
    Sure does
    I think that Su-25UTG with the wing fold is a one-off prototype shown at MAKS 99 - in fact it is a T8UTG-1.

    AFAIK, production Su-25UTG's used on the Kuznetsov do not have wing fold.

    Ken

  12. #16557
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    5,470

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by civilriot2009 View Post
    Yak-38



    Harrier



    The question is....Soviets copied from RAF or the other way around??
    Why you think that somebody copied something? Because they look simmilar?
    Jak-38 and Harrier are very different planes... Read about they engines...

    Its reallY EASY to spot the differences on those pics
    Last edited by Holycrusader; 04-09-2009 at 05:46 AM.

  13. #16558
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    31
    Posts
    12,556

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mannelig View Post
    Isn`t that tooooooooo tooo much?
    Too ambitious you mean?

  14. #16559
    Senior Member mannelig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    1,156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xav View Post
    Too ambitious you mean?
    Yes. These characteristcs are so unreal. I just can`t imagine a plane with mach 6 speed.

  15. #16560
    Senior Member mannelig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    1,156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by civilriot2009 View Post
    The question is....Soviets copied from RAF or the other way around??
    Actually Yak-38 technology was sold to the US and was used to create F-35

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •