Thread: Russian Photos (updated on regular basis)

  1. #16576
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    10

    Default Yak-141 FreeStyle


  2. #16577

    Default

    One of the Yak-141 prototypes is now at Monino......



    .... and there is a wind-tunnel model at the Zadorozhny museum....



    Ken

  3. #16578
    Senior Member -Julik- 4.GdKp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Austria/Vienna
    Posts
    1,461

    Default

    BTR/Tigr production in Arzamas



    More
    http://www.arms-tass.su/?page=gallery&gcid=338&part=1

  4. #16579

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by civilriot2009 View Post
    Yak-38



    Harrier



    The question is....Soviets copied from RAF or the other way around??
    The Yak-38 was actually a Soviet panic-response to the Harrier. It was based on an earlier British prototype VTOL, which was scrapped. Performance-wise, the Yak-38 was terrible (IMO should have never been developed, since at the time the Soviets actually had several other VTOL prototypes), thus the Soviets quickly began shifting towards developing the Yak 141 (which cost over 10 years of development).

  5. #16580

    Default

    the yak-38 can never be judge since it has never pass the prototype status

  6. #16581

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Revive View Post
    the yak-38 can never be judge since it has never pass the prototype status
    The Yak-38 was the first production model, after it first flew yak-38 entered service with the Soviet Naval Aviation. A total of 143 Yak-38s were produced. Did you mean yak-41 never passed the prototype status??
    Last edited by civilriot2009; 04-10-2009 at 01:59 AM.

  7. #16582

    Default

    Inrernational records for Vertical Take-Off and Landing Aeroplanes

    http://www.fai.org:81/VTOL/H.html

    8 records for Yak-141 and 4 for the Harrier.

  8. #16583
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    142

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GTX-Typhoon View Post

    What is the status of this project?:

    hm can anyone answer that please, its looks like an airborne radar on it if im right. UAV AEW?

    and also, what major equipment and changes are thier in the Indian MIG-29K's different radar? Israeli equipment?
    and is there any info on the size and weight difference between a mig-29K and a normal mig-29?

    thanks in advance

  9. #16584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by takavar92 View Post
    hm can anyone answer that please, its looks like an airborne radar on it if im right. UAV AEW?

    and also, what major equipment and changes are thier in the Indian MIG-29K's different radar? Israeli equipment?
    and is there any info on the size and weight difference between a mig-29K and a normal mig-29?

    thanks in advance
    If it was a radar (if AWACS)...then the plane must be huge. Take a look at this pic http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/...0_AWACS_lg.jpg
    IMO it has to be a satellite reciever to control the plane. It could be anything...
    Last edited by civilriot2009; 04-10-2009 at 03:00 AM.

  10. #16585

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by takavar92 View Post
    hm can anyone answer that please, its looks like an airborne radar on it if im right. UAV AEW?

    and also, what major equipment and changes are thier in the Indian MIG-29K's different radar? Israeli equipment?
    and is there any info on the size and weight difference between a mig-29K and a normal mig-29?

    thanks in advance
    MiG-29K (Product 9.31)
    Naval variant, the letter "K" stands for "Korabelnogo bazirovaniya" (Deck-based ), with equipment such as folding wings, arrestor gear, and reinforced landing gear. Originally intended for the Admiral Kuznetsov class aircraft carriers, had even received series production approval from Russian Ministry of Defence but was later grounded in 1992 due to shift in military doctrine and state financial difficulty. MiG Corporation restarted the program in 1999 and made vital improvement to the previous design. On 20 January 2004, Indian Navy signed a contract of 12 single-seat MiG-29K and four two-seat MiG-29KUB set delivery in the period from 2007 to 2009. Modification was made for Indian Navy requirement; now standard for all current production, featured Zhuk-ME radar, RD-33MK engine, combat payload up to 5,500 kg, 13 hardpoints (inclusive of the multi-lock bomb carriers), additional fuel tanks situated in dorsal spine fairing and wing LERXs, increased total fuel capacity by 50% comparing to first variant of MiG-29 and updated 4-channel digital fly-by-wire flight control system. Current production MiG-29K and MiG-29KUB also share a full-sized two-seater style canopy. With special coatings MiG-29K radar reflecting surface is 4-5 times smaller than of basic MiG-29. Cockpit displays consist of wide HUD and three (seven on MiG-29KUB) colour LCD MFDs and French Sigma-95 satellite GPS module and Topsight E helmet-mounted targeting system. Compatible with the full range of weapons carried by the MiG-29M and MiG-29SMT. NATO reporting code is Fulcrum-D.

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_44d3OT-xI3...imulator-1.jpg
    Last edited by civilriot2009; 04-10-2009 at 03:03 AM.

  11. #16586
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,542

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by civilriot2009 View Post
    If it was a radar (if AWACS)...then the plane must be huge. Take a look at this pic http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/...0_AWACS_lg.jpg
    IMO it has to be a satellite reciever to control the plane. It could be anything...
    It's most likely a communication relay.

  12. #16587

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by void View Post
    It's most likely a communication relay.
    It might has a cam....it takes pics for recognition then sents to satellite and then to HQ???

  13. #16588
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Koenigsberg, pRussia
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,873

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by civilriot2009 View Post
    It might has a cam....it takes pics for recognition then sents to satellite and then to HQ???
    too big antenna
    relay for sure

  14. #16589
    Member K-5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Homosphere, bottom
    Age
    27
    Posts
    428

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jaybe View Post
    too big antenna
    relay for sure
    It's sukhoi's proposed AEW UAV concept. Sort of like E-2, but with operators seated in remote control&command module.

  15. #16590
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    31
    Posts
    12,556

    Default

    What if there is lag?

    What the operators will see on the screens will be a few seconds old... not live

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •