Thread: Russian Photos (updated on regular basis)

  1. #31351
    Senior Member Andy_UA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Age
    27
    Posts
    1,362

    Default

    Two new Ka-52's



  2. #31352
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    31
    Posts
    12,556

    Default

    #51 is painted blue/grey. Is it for Navy/ Mistral ?

  3. #31353
    Senior Member Andy_UA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Age
    27
    Posts
    1,362

    Default

    They all belong to Kamov as of now. As Ka-52 has not been accepted to service(needs more tests?upgrades?).

  4. #31354
    Senior Member Raden5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Russian Federation
    Posts
    1,730

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xav View Post
    #51 is painted blue/grey. Is it for Navy/ Mistral ?
    It is told - "the first serial machine", "a new camouflage", now in Torzhok.
    www.take-off.ru


  5. #31355
    Senior Member Andy_UA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Age
    27
    Posts
    1,362

    Default

    First machine from military tests batch. I assume that would be right.

  6. #31356
    Senior Member artjomh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    4,557

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xav View Post
    #51 is painted blue/grey. Is it for Navy/ Mistral ?
    Ka-52 doesn't have folding rotors, so it's not going to be used on any naval vessels for now.

  7. #31357
    Member SchnitzelHunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    202

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Khathi View Post
    Translation:
    My English is insufficient..
    This is an Indian plane, from the series that was specifically modified in Russia by the Indian order for takeoff (and landing) from inundated runways with the water depths up to 1 m.

    PS: But I don't believe that it's an Indian plane personally. First, I don't remember Indians having the Su-25, and second, the plane has a Bulgarian roundel.
    Wow, that is something...... I already liked the SU 25 for it's abilities anyway...... but being able to land and take-off from 1m deep water is quite something...... maybe one would never nedd to that... but let alone it being possible is just amazing.... try that with any western equivalent ...........

  8. #31358
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Age
    26
    Posts
    136

    Default

    It's not taking off! The information above for taking off in 1 m deep water is bull*hit It's just taxiing, and this is no Indian one, this is Bulgarian Su at Bezmer AFB.

  9. #31359
    Senior Member medo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    On Earth
    Posts
    1,692

    Default

    Those Ka-52 have numbers 51 and 53. Maybe they have 52 also. How many they were build last year and how many will be this year?

  10. #31360
    Senior Member Raden5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Russian Federation
    Posts
    1,730

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by medo View Post
    Those Ka-52 have numbers 51 and 53. Maybe they have 52 also. How many they were build last year and how many will be this year?
    And what difference? To whom is it necessary???

  11. #31361
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    31
    Posts
    12,556

    Default

    1- Can Mi-28 fold its blades for ships ?

    2- Is Ka-52 better/more modern than Mi-28 ?

    3- What happened to that project?
    http://www.club-tm.ru/Rezenz/Ka58/Image45.jpg

  12. #31362
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Age
    50
    Posts
    2,535

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xav View Post
    1- Can Mi-28 fold its blades for ships ?

    2- Is Ka-52 better/more modern than Mi-28 ?

    3- What happened to that project?
    http://www.club-tm.ru/Rezenz/Ka58/Image45.jpg
    1. No, it can't. That is the whole thing about Kamov's coaxial design--works well for the Navy.

    2. Apples and oranges. Two different machines, two very different design philosophies.

    3. I do not know if there ever was one.

  13. #31363
    Senior Member TheEvian100's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    ex-enallos
    Posts
    4,092

    Default

    RuAF Sukhoi Su-17M4 Fitter.
    Based at GroB Dölln, Germany:












  14. #31364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by medo View Post
    Those Ka-52 have numbers 51 and 53. Maybe they have 52 also. How many they were build last year and how many will be this year?
    In 2007-2009 RuAF has recieved 7 new Ka-52, 3 Ka-50 and 27 Mi-28N.

    http://armstass.su/?page=article&aid=77353&cid=25

  15. #31365
    Senior Member artjomh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    4,557

    Default

    Wait...

    So, if Akhtubinsk GLIC/Torzhok CBP are testing Ka-52 as an armed reconnaisance helicopter (sort of counterpart to RAH-66 Commanche) and Mi-28N as a close air support helicopter (like AH-64 Apache or AH-1 Cobra), then why the hell do they need any Ka-50?

    I understand that the whole program is still work-in-progress and no stable doctrine has been developed yet, but it seems to me like Kamov plat has got their allocation of budget money and between Ka-52 and Ka-60 and some future naval helo aren't going broke, so why is MoD paying for development of 2 Kamov land-based combat helicoters?

    Sounds like a giant boondoggle to me.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •