Thread: Russian Photos (updated on regular basis)

  1. #31936
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,541

    Default

    GLONASS receivers have advanced greatly over the last few years. There was a photo somewhere comparing the sizes of the GLONASS receiver chips over the years. The most current ones are almost as small now as the GPS ones. But for military equipment that isnt an issue anyway, who cares if it doesnt fit nicely into a mobile phone, as long as itll fit on a tank. In terms of the quality of localisation data it should be as good as GPS on the territory of Russia, to make it good worldwide will take a little while longer as more sats are put up.

    The statements regarding the thermal sights is imho kind of weird. A modern top line thermal sight (such as the Catherine FC) will cost upwards of $1million (maybe more). It makes no sense to put those onto BTRs or BMPs, since the thermal camera will end up costing 2x the cost of the rest of the vehicle. It makes more sense to get the appropriate sights for the vehicle. So top of the line for MBTs, and second tier for BMPs, and third tier maybe for BTRs, otherwise the cost structure will be completely skewed.

  2. #31937
    Senior Member Hyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    There
    Posts
    6,887

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by void View Post
    In terms of the quality of localisation data it should be as good as GPS on the territory of Russia, to make it good worldwide will take a little while longer as more sats are put up.
    GLONASS has and can not have any connection or restriction to the territory of Russia. Actually, the coverage is sometimes better in other parts of the world, but on a 24h level the coverage is best in the northern hemisphere (Europe, North America, Russia), which is logical because they place them accordingly. To see the actual coverage in real time, follow this link:

    http://www.glonass-ianc.rsa.ru/pls/h...24526764632100

  3. #31938
    Senior Member Konst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Empire of evil
    Posts
    1,255

  4. #31939
    Member _GDS_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Lithuania, Vilnius
    Age
    26
    Posts
    586

    Default

    today is an aniversary... 24 years ago on the same day (aprill 26th) something happened, but by the lives of brave liquidators, we are still living.
    to keep you guys on topic, plz post some screens.

  5. #31940
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Age
    50
    Posts
    2,535

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Herman the German View Post
    -I would say that a Glonass coordinate system is better than nothing at all. It may not be as effective and comfortable as a real GPS based navigation and control system but its also a lot cheaper. Nothing worrying there IMO.

    -That the digital communication and coordination field is one of the big trouble childs of the Russian army is well known. So what he writes there sounds rather reasonable and realistic. However I cant judge on the satellite situation, what satellites for digital data communication are planed?
    .
    Hm, allow me to remind here that it was Soviet Union which pioneered Space navigation (aka КСН) as early as early 1970-s and produced (while United States was still using GPS--not satellite, that is not space based--Omega) Parus for military (6 + 2 satellites) and Cikada (4 + 2 satellites) for civilian purposes.Both worked just fine, while Parus was allowing an excellent СКП (средняя квадратичная погрешность) in, let's say, Northern Hemisphere even for the boomers. It is just the matter of the ultimate surprise how this advantage and unique experience were squandered and lost. Or maybe it is not surprising at all. FYI, the receivers of Parus (aka as Shluze) were initially....a revolutionary global satellite digital communication systems later converted to receivers of KSN.

  6. #31941
    Senior Member YevgenyP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Pillau
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,776

    Default

    Chernobyl 24 years ago









    check this http://www.pripyat-forum.ru/viewtopi...a1a5d775e1791a

  7. #31942
    Senior Member Konst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Empire of evil
    Posts
    1,255

    Default






































    ...............

  8. #31943
    Senior Member YevgenyP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Pillau
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,776

    Default



    1234567890

  9. #31944

    Default

    hi,
    can anyone tell me what is this place? is this field right next to the aero museum? or it is actually part of the museum property?
    ps i mean pic from #32129

  10. #31945
    Member _GDS_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Lithuania, Vilnius
    Age
    26
    Posts
    586

    Default

    good YevgenyjP, keep those pictures coming, because it seems a lot of people forgot what happened...

  11. #31946
    Senior Member Konst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Empire of evil
    Posts
    1,255

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Revive View Post
    hi,
    can anyone tell me what is this place? is this field right next to the aero museum? or it is actually part of the museum property?
    ps i mean pic from #32129
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khodynka_Field

  12. #31947
    Likes 'em chunky Redbeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    758

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YevgenyP View Post


    1234567890
    I've been there yesterday. Found some drifters in green suits sitting by a fire, playing a guitar and just plain chillin'.

  13. #31948
    Senior Member YevgenyP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Pillau
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,776

    Default

    Chernobyl - various




























  14. #31949

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Revive View Post
    hi,
    can anyone tell me what is this place? is this field right next to the aero museum? or it is actually part of the museum property?
    ps i mean pic from #32129
    It is the remains of Moscow's Central Airfield - formerly known as Frunze or Khodynka on Leningradsky Prospekt.

    A place steeped in Soviet aviation history......

    The excellent, privately-run museum used to occupy an area north of the old runway and had many rare types as well as some ex-service machines.

    In this respect it was better than Monino - because Monino tends to house one-offs and prototypes, rather than production airframes....

    When the old airfield started to be built on by property developers, the exhibits looked to be in jeopardy.....





    Note the very rare Sukhoi T10-20 long-distance record attempt Flanker.... photos taken in 2004

    By 2006, the old museum was closed - and the airframes were being 'stored' inside a chain-link fenced compound on the old runway - where they were subject to the elements and local vandals.



    Here's the T10-20 - sadly now minus its canopy....



    I visited again in 2008 - the airframes are looking really derelict now - being damaged and looted.





    There is talk of a new, indoor museum being built - but they had better hurry up - or there won't be anything left to form a display.....



    Ken

  15. #31950
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Age
    40
    Posts
    24

    Default Elbe Day 2010

    Elbe Day 2010 in Torgau (Germany)

    Anniversary of the historic meeting of Soviet and American troops on the Elbe in 1945


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXgBMyBUKqA

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •