![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 5
|
*Im not sure if this belongs in Gear or pics n vids*
After studying the boberg pistol, I kinda 'upscaled' the mechanism a lil bit and ended up with this. a lazy attempt at modelling the outer shell using Milkshape lolo ![]() and the simple animation of the internals Caliber: 5.56x45mm Magazine capacity: 30 rnds Rate of fire: With such a system, i'd say pretty low, maybe 500rnd/min? Operation: Gas operated, short stroke piston, beretta 92f style locked breech. Ideally with such mechanism, a full sized barrel can fit inside a carbine sized weapon while still having the conventional rifle layout on the outside, as opposed to the sometimes akward bullpup configuration. Discuss. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Super Boot.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ass End First, Anus End Forward, Anal Enema Flatulent (AEF)
Age: 21
Posts: 5,284
|
interesting to say the least
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 342
|
If it's a bullpup, why is the mag in front of the trigger?
Ah, watched the animation... I get it... still why not just put the mag to the rear? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Prussia
Age: 24
Posts: 783
|
Exacly
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 5
|
its much faster to reload a rifle of a conventional layout than a of a bullpup layout, and it guess its for countries sticking to the conventional rifle rather than bullpups
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 80
|
Interesting but doesnt make this construction/system the rifle much heavier compared to other bullpup rifles?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Between the dykes.
Posts: 214
|
I think it might be too complicated and prone to getting stuck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Croatia
Age: 30
Posts: 16
|
IMHO, this is overcomplicating an already complicated (bullpup) design.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 17
|
Neat idea, but every moving part is just another weak point that can break.
Apply the principles of K.I.S.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
Also the animations shows it to be automatic without any other parts (except spring and gas piston) to operate. So I'd say it's less complicated than a FN FNC for example. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Si vis pacem, para bellum
Posts: 4,207
|
Not really into all this technicality, but never-the-less, well made animation. Keep it up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Up North, With your Pint
Posts: 103
|
Great video and design idea, keep up the good work!
To me there's nothing complex about bullpup design. Sure it may be hard to get used to, but once you spend time on range (even I, with the limited time I got on range with the L98, got used to the magazine being where it is). Also, an experienced user can change mags just as fast as any rifle in a regular configuration. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 74
|
I like it!
I would go with conventional ejection. No need to make it more complex with the forward ejection. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The land of a butt load of lakes (Minnesota)
Age: 19
Posts: 2,006
|
Whats complicated about a bullpup layout?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Banned user
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sitting on my couch watching the Canucks.
Posts: 61
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|