Zippora Seven : topless with 16 years old

Minardiau · 05-12-2008, 12:35 AM

AN Australian magazine is being investigated after photographing a 16-year-old girl topless in two fashion shoots.

NSFW cointains topless photos of a minor

T3ngu · 05-12-2008, 12:36 AM

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. What can I say........

deagle · 05-12-2008, 12:50 AM

yet the online picture was uncensored also (no blacked over mammillary ducts, and yea, i snuck a peek).

where was the agent, modeling agency, photographer, photography agency, magazine agency, and lets not forget model herself to set limits. Where were her parents, who might approve of modeling, but didn't specify NO full/partial nudity, and where was her self-respect ??

Calanen · 05-12-2008, 01:32 AM

Its only child pornography under s 91H Crimes Act 1900 in NSW Australia if the person being photographed is under the age of 16, so under State law there is not a problem. However, under Federal law, you cannot obtain a classification if it shows sexual conduct or is a photograph of sexual nature of a person under the age of 18. Without a classification, it cannot be published or shown. So, it is likely that the Feds will have something to say to this magazine.

By the way, for everyone in the United States pretty much, you are committing an offence by viewing the material and clicking on the link that Min has posted. At work or not. The offence is committed by you being in posession of the material. How are you in possession you say? It is in your cache once you look at it.

Min, you might want to make your warning a bit more explicit for the benefit of our US members, especially those on US military installations.

Australia and UK however, are good as I understand it. Most of Europe is likely to be OK.

While the prospect of being busted is perhaps remote, I counsel our American members to respect the law of their home country.

Rictor · 05-12-2008, 01:33 AM

See, this is where the age questions slides into a grey area. Morally, it is no more outrageous than if the model were ten or fifteen months older. And yet, the law is the law.

BTW, what's Australia's age of consent? I know that in some place, it's 16-17, as opposed to the more usual 18.

Calanen · 05-12-2008, 01:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rictor

See, this is where the age questions slides into a grey area. Morally, it is no more outrageous than if the model were ten or fifteen months older. And yet, the law is the law.

BTW, what's Australia's age of consent? I know that in some place, it's 16-17, as opposed to the more usual 18.

16 for girls, 18 for men.

Rictor · 05-12-2008, 01:41 AM

You just know that whoever made that law had a big, pervy grin on his face. The two-year discrepancy is like a neon "Jailbait Here, Dive In" sign.

Ivo · 05-12-2008, 01:43 AM

I thought it was a Kiwi rag.

Calanen · 05-12-2008, 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ivo

I thought it was a Kiwi rag.

No - New Zealand modelling agency is who the model is with. But the magazine is definitely Australian.

eskachig · 05-12-2008, 03:07 AM

Eh, where "art" is concerned the question is far more flexible, as opposed to pornography. For example Thora Birch was topless in "American Beauty" while under age. Kiera Knightly was topless at 15 in some movie. I assume there was parental consent for these photos.

I think that if she can consent to sex she can do something like this. They're just boobies people.

Eztyga · 05-12-2008, 03:22 AM

I guess those who are outraged by this shoot as 'going to far' have never Googled 'barely legal'.
As Calanen pointed out, she is of legal age here in Oz, and you are all crims for looking at her, well in the US anyway.

Ezy

jokuvaan · 05-12-2008, 06:06 AM

Its ever lasting fight between art people and nudity conservatives.

California Joe · 05-12-2008, 09:59 AM

Her parents should be beaten just for giving her that name. Retards. It sounds like the name of some bad Japanese hentai anime movie.

SBL · 05-12-2008, 10:03 AM

"Jippora Sebenteenu"

playtym · 05-12-2008, 10:06 AM

OK, enough legal talk, lets get to the important bit.

The article says there were pictures of her topless on a horse in the March issue. Who's got those pics?

05-12-2008, 12:35 AM	#1
Minardiau Fabio "I wouldn't touch Megan Gale with your dick" Lanzoni Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Leader of the MP.net Socialist Workers Party. Age: 30 Posts: 15,320	Zippora Seven : topless with 16 years old AN Australian magazine is being investigated after photographing a 16-year-old girl topless in two fashion shoots. NSFW cointains topless photos of a minor Last edited by HOLLiS; 05-12-2008 at 03:10 PM. Reason: removed link, per Calanen advice. This forum is US based

05-12-2008, 12:36 AM	#2
T3ngu Provoking feelings in Slouche's crotch region Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Oztralia Posts: 10,059	Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. What can I say........ Last edited by T3ngu; 05-12-2008 at 12:52 AM. Reason: I peeked as well

05-12-2008, 12:50 AM	#3
deagle Faux Phallus Smuggler Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 3,849	yet the online picture was uncensored also (no blacked over mammillary ducts, and yea, i snuck a peek). where was the agent, modeling agency, photographer, photography agency, magazine agency, and lets not forget model herself to set limits. Where were her parents, who might approve of modeling, but didn't specify NO full/partial nudity, and where was her self-respect ??

05-12-2008, 01:32 AM	#4
Calanen Banned user Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 7,872	Its only child pornography under s 91H Crimes Act 1900 in NSW Australia if the person being photographed is under the age of 16, so under State law there is not a problem. However, under Federal law, you cannot obtain a classification if it shows sexual conduct or is a photograph of sexual nature of a person under the age of 18. Without a classification, it cannot be published or shown. So, it is likely that the Feds will have something to say to this magazine. By the way, for everyone in the United States pretty much, you are committing an offence by viewing the material and clicking on the link that Min has posted. At work or not. The offence is committed by you being in posession of the material. How are you in possession you say? It is in your cache once you look at it. Min, you might want to make your warning a bit more explicit for the benefit of our US members, especially those on US military installations. Australia and UK however, are good as I understand it. Most of Europe is likely to be OK. While the prospect of being busted is perhaps remote, I counsel our American members to respect the law of their home country.

05-12-2008, 01:33 AM	#5
Rictor Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 2,446	See, this is where the age questions slides into a grey area. Morally, it is no more outrageous than if the model were ten or fifteen months older. And yet, the law is the law. BTW, what's Australia's age of consent? I know that in some place, it's 16-17, as opposed to the more usual 18.

05-12-2008, 01:41 AM	#7
Rictor Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 2,446	You just know that whoever made that law had a big, pervy grin on his face. The two-year discrepancy is like a neon "Jailbait Here, Dive In" sign.

05-12-2008, 01:43 AM	#8
Ivo Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Australia Posts: 110	I thought it was a Kiwi rag.

05-12-2008, 03:07 AM	#10
eskachig Senior Member Join Date: May 2007 Age: 27 Posts: 1,586	Eh, where "art" is concerned the question is far more flexible, as opposed to pornography. For example Thora Birch was topless in "American Beauty" while under age. Kiera Knightly was topless at 15 in some movie. I assume there was parental consent for these photos. I think that if she can consent to sex she can do something like this. They're just boobies people.

05-12-2008, 03:22 AM	#11
Eztyga Pusser Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Two mouthfuls away from Heaven Posts: 3,897	I guess those who are outraged by this shoot as 'going to far' have never Googled 'barely legal'. As Calanen pointed out, she is of legal age here in Oz, and you are all crims for looking at her, well in the US anyway. Ezy

05-12-2008, 06:06 AM	#12
jokuvaan Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 794	Its ever lasting fight between art people and nudity conservatives.

05-12-2008, 09:59 AM	#13
California Joe No Good Bloody Seppo Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Staring at goats till their hearts explode... Age: 46 Posts: 25,424	Her parents should be beaten just for giving her that name. Retards. It sounds like the name of some bad Japanese hentai anime movie.

05-12-2008, 10:03 AM	#14
SBL Miss Convicted 2009 Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dividing my time between the far east and the east coast. Age: 25 Posts: 15,802	"Jippora Sebenteenu"

05-12-2008, 10:06 AM	#15
playtym Saffie envoy for the League of Cantankerous Old Farts. Join Date: May 2006 Location: The Peoples Republic of Azania Posts: 8,904	OK, enough legal talk, lets get to the important bit. The article says there were pictures of her topless on a horse in the March issue. Who's got those pics?