![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned user
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Posts: 2,348
|
This was the name of a system to mow down infantry. It consisted of 88 PPSH guns located in the Tu-2 bomb bay.
![]() ![]() The system is lowered for reloading. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
|
Wow, Ive never ever seen anything like this b4 from WW2 era, that's certainly a rather amazing concept for the time.. what would the firing time be? 10secs? then fly back for reload?
thanks for the pics |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North East Scotland.
Posts: 1,401
|
Never heard of this weapon. Very interesting and thanks very much for sharing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: cyprus
Age: 32
Posts: 4,533
|
MetalStorm uncestor
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: "The Best Place on Earth"
Age: 26
Posts: 1,962
|
Is this right? PPSH fires 900 rounds per minute X 88 guns = 79200 rounds per minute, wow
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Rough head
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,108
|
Nice find, was it ever deployed? The 7.62x 25mm pistol cartridge leads me to wonder just how low the pilot had to fly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denmark
Age: 21
Posts: 151
|
Whoa.. certainly wouldn't mind to see a testfire
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 23
Posts: 1,237
|
Wow. Thats pretty overkill
i remember reading that the germans back then installed a similar mechanism on fighters like the 109ers to destroy allied bombers. dont think it were THAT much guns installed, but it was similar. the guns faced upwards and were activated through foto-cells. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Pulling my head in before someone does it for me
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: B0st0n
Posts: 2,976
|
Yeah. The Nazis also had a plane that flew up over bomber formations and shot rockets into them from rocket pods. I want to say the ME-163 Komet, but I can't find anything to say that it was.
LRPV, I agree with you, but when things fall from the sky then gain speed. Anyway, that thing is neat looking. I wouldn't mind seeing it in action. Last edited by Squeezee; 06-29-2008 at 05:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 23
Posts: 1,237
|
the komet had only guns afaik.
the rocketplane with the rocketpod in the nose was the natter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hanging out of your mam's backdoors ya slaaaagggs!
Posts: 2,216
|
Woah... it would suck to be underneath one of those things...
Wonder if it was as noisy as a Phalanx shoot? 88 SMGs all at once - nasty! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Pulling my head in before someone does it for me
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: B0st0n
Posts: 2,976
|
I know the Natter had rockets in the nose, but didn't it dive down on top if its targets? I am pretty sure it did, not like th plane I am thinking of.
Last edited by Squeezee; 06-29-2008 at 05:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tucson
Age: 39
Posts: 411
|
Nice post, Sergei. That's certainly a variant of the Tu-2 I had not seen before!
Reminds me of all the things the Luftwaffe tried with the Henschel Hs 129--multiple recoiless rifles, 75mm cannon, and I think they even experimented with a mortar system. Many thanks for the info! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In freedom, which others have died for so that I may have it.
Posts: 5,896
|
Impressive, thanks Sergei!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
trying to be celibate
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Curing The Sick With My Noodley Appendage
Posts: 13,638
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|