Military Photos  

Go Back   Military Photos > General > Strictly Photos & Video

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-05-2009, 04:22 PM   #1
chulo_allen
behind the times
 
chulo_allen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Time traveling-In Waterloo convincing Napoleon to hold the Imperial Guard just a little longer
Posts: 12,134
Default MetalStorm 3GL Grenade

Remember this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8hlj4EbdsE

Now even more friendly and portable
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IP_GTx4o134
chulo_allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 04:45 PM   #2
DaGreatRV
Senior Member
 
DaGreatRV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: earth
Posts: 1,202
Default

I don't know man, won't that make the front end real heavy?
DaGreatRV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:01 PM   #3
Bibite
Member
 
Bibite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Montreal Qc Ca
Posts: 31
Default

****ty trigger technique....
Bibite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:10 PM   #4
Mu-Meson
Banned user
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hotbed of our fungoid
Age: 23
Posts: 2,717
Default

The only time I have ever seen or heard of MetalStorm has been on Youtube. Have they ever actually sold anything to any military?
Mu-Meson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 06:20 PM   #5
bono
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Booze, babes, billions
Posts: 673
Default

Customer List

Obviously they're not gonna sell it to Chinese and Russians.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mu-Meson View Post
The only time I have ever seen or heard of MetalStorm has been on Youtube. Have they ever actually sold anything to any military?
bono is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 07:06 PM   #6
Evolv5
Senior Member
 
Evolv5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Si vis pacem, para bellum
Posts: 4,207
Default

I'm no expert, but that rifle grenade launcher actually looks feasible.
Evolv5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 07:08 PM   #7
nullterm
Senior Member
 
nullterm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC
Age: 31
Posts: 6,139
Default

I have to say I had/have my doubts about the whole MS thing, but that actually looks somewhat practical.
nullterm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 10:51 PM   #8
ego docui history
Member
 
ego docui history's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 79
Default

Every time we start shooting somewhere, people would get stock promotion "newsletters" touting MetalStorm. A junky penny stock that I used to take tons of calls on when I was a broker.

Still, it is a neat idea. More of a solution in desperate need of a problem.
ego docui history is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 01:34 AM   #9
Arnie100
Member
 
Arnie100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 786
Default

Looks more feasable then OICW/XM-29 SABR!!
Arnie100 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 01:41 AM   #10
goat89
Senior Member
 
goat89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Republic of Singapore, but in Canada studying
Posts: 6,334
Default

Looks a little bulky...
GHOST RECON FTW
goat89 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 08:30 AM   #11
Sabre
Senior Member
 
Sabre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 3,661
Default

Pointless.

The first grenade will be so far up the barrel that its accuracy will be rubbish compared to the third.

If you need a rapid firing GL, then just use a GMG!

I can put accurate 40mm rounds down with a UGL in fairly quick time. You're only talking about 4-5 seconds to reload and aim at most.

Imagine that thing on the front of a bullpup weapon like the SA80, or a short weapon like an M4 carbine. It'll be totally imbalanced.
Sabre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 08:37 AM   #12
little icebear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Age: 13
Posts: 1,826
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evolv5 View Post
I'm no expert, but that rifle grenade launcher actually looks feasible.
Far from being an expert either, but I disagree. Iīve handled an AG36 before and thatīs already quiet a different feeling from having a rifle without an underslung grenade launcher.

Donīt think this will work out well. At least not with current ammunition.
little icebear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 10:38 AM   #13
Zeckenteppich
Member
 
Zeckenteppich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 95
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabre View Post
Pointless.

The first grenade will be so far up the barrel that its accuracy will be rubbish compared to the third.

If you need a rapid firing GL, then just use a GMG!

I can put accurate 40mm rounds down with a UGL in fairly quick time. You're only talking about 4-5 seconds to reload and aim at most.

Imagine that thing on the front of a bullpup weapon like the SA80, or a short weapon like an M4 carbine. It'll be totally imbalanced.
That is exactly the same what I thought about that "invention".
Zeckenteppich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 10:40 AM   #14
the_13th_redneck
Member
 
the_13th_redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 635
Default

Yeah... like what about when I want to use my rifle as a rifle?
the_13th_redneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 10:44 AM   #15
chulo_allen
behind the times
 
chulo_allen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Time traveling-In Waterloo convincing Napoleon to hold the Imperial Guard just a little longer
Posts: 12,134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabre View Post
Pointless.

The first grenade will be so far up the barrel that its accuracy will be rubbish compared to the third.

If you need a rapid firing GL, then just use a GMG!

I can put accurate 40mm rounds down with a UGL in fairly quick time. You're only talking about 4-5 seconds to reload and aim at most.

Imagine that thing on the front of a bullpup weapon like the SA80, or a short weapon like an M4 carbine. It'll be totally imbalanced.
In the span of 6 to 10 inches how much difference does it make to propel a 40mm 100 yards?

Now notice that the grenade barrel is all the way to the rifle barrel end, a typical m203 extends 15 inches, normally to the end of the front sight.

Looks like they added a few inches to keep the same barrel length travel for the first grenade as a normal M203, so technically, it gets more accurate (by your reasoning)
chulo_allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.